The "Us Stupid Drunks" Conspiracy
by A. Orange
|
The idea that you'll have more intrinsic worth sober than drunk
is a bigoted, fascist view that holds that members of certain
groups are intrinsically less or more deserving than others --
a view that has caused more human suffering than any [other] single idea.
-- Jack Trimpey
|
|
This is President Abraham Lincoln, speaking to John M. Thayer, a brigadier
from General Ulysses S. Grant's army, about the complaints about General
Grant's drinking:
"Delegation after delegation has called on me with the same request,
'Recall Grant from command,' as the members of the delegations were not willing
that their sons and brothers should be under the control of an intemperate
leader. I could not think of relieving him, and these demands became
very vexatious. I therefore hit upon this plan to stop them.
"One day a delegation headed by a distinguished doctor of divinity from New York,
called on me and made the familiar complaint and protest against Grant being retained
in his command. After the clergyman had concluded his remarks, I asked if any others
desired to add anything to what had already been said. They replied that they did not.
Then looking as serious as I could, I said:
"'Doctor, can you tell me where General Grant gets his liquor?'"
"'The doctor seemed quite nonplussed, but replied that he could not. I then said to
him:
"'I am very sorry, for if you could tell me I would direct the Chief Quartermaster
of the army to lay in a large stock of the same kind of liquor, and would also direct
him to furnish a supply to some of my other generals who have never yet won a victory.'"
Lincoln handed Thayer a friendly slap on the leg, lay back in his chair, had a laugh,
and resumed:
"What I want and what the people want is Generals who will fight battles and win
victories. Grant has done this and I propose to stand by him. I permitted this incident
to get into print, and I have been troubled no more with delegations protesting against
Grant. Somehow or other I have always felt a leaning toward Grant. Ever since he sent
that message to Buckner, 'No terms but unconditional surrender,' I have felt that he was
a man I could tie to, though I have never seen him."
The secretaries, Nicolay and Hay, noted that when overzealous people had accused Grant
of intemperance, Lincoln's reply was, "If I knew what brand of whiskey he drinks
I would send a barrel or so to some other generals."
Abraham Lincoln, The War Years, Carl Sandburg,
Volume II, pages 119-120.
|
An alcoholic in his cups is an unlovely creature.
William G. Wilson,
The "Big Book" Alcoholics Anonymous,
3rd and 4th Editions, page 16.
Alcoholics especially should be able to see that instinct run wild in
themselves is the underlying cause of their destructive drinking.
... This perverse soul-sickness is not pleasant to look upon.
William G. Wilson,
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, page 44.
Drinkers are like that.
William G. Wilson,
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 9.
|
To describe drunkenness for the colorful vocabulary is rather cynical.
There is nothing easier than to capitalize on drunkards.
Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1860-1904), Russian author, playwright.
Letter, December 24, 1886, to N.A. Leikin. Complete Works and Letters in
Thirty Volumes, Letters, v. 1, p. 282, "Nauka" (1976).
|
Many A.A. members participate in a tacit conspiracy to
stereotype alcoholics. And the
picture they paint of themselves isn't a pretty one.
In the book Bill W. by Robert Thomsen, the author
tells the story of how the "Big Book" got its name back
in the year 1939:
Akron favored "Alcoholics Anonymous," New York "The
Way Out." Another burning issue, another impasse, and one that
was resolved only when Bill sent a wire to Fitz in Maryland asking
him to go to Washington and find out how many "Way Out"s were
registered at the Library of Congress. Fitz's reply informed them
that there were already twelve books entitled "The Way Out" and,
as far as he could discover, no "Alcoholics Anonymous." That did
it. No drunk was going to risk being the thirteenth
anything. The book had its title, the fellowship had a name.
Bill W., Robert Thompsen, pp. 285-6.
The key sentence is
"No drunk was going to risk being
the thirteenth anything."
All I can
say is:
"That's funny. I was an alcoholic for twenty years,
and I never had a problem with being
the sixth, or the twelfth, or the thirteenth anything. And I
can't think of any drinking buddies
who were particularly superstitious about the number 13. So why
are you writing such garbage about us alcoholics?"
I'm not singling out that particular book for any special criticism;
that book
is just another pro-A.A. book that follows the standard A.A. party
line about everything. The Big
Book Alcoholics Anonymous is far worse when it comes to
stereotyping alcoholics. And Bill Wilson's second book
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions is even worse than that one.
The author, Robert Thomsen, could have described the situation something like this:
"Bill Wilson and the other founders of A.A. decided not
to use a name that had already been used, by other people, for
other things, a dozen times over."
Or he could have written,
"The A.A. founders sensibly decided to use an original
name, rather than one that had been already been used so many
times, by so many other people."
Those would have been honest, factual statements.
But Thomsen didn't do that; instead, he slipped a stereotyped slur
against alcoholics into the text:
"No drunk was going to risk being the thirteenth anything.
The book had its title, the fellowship had a name."
Notice how Thomsen implied that those A.A. members were afraid to take a risk,
and implied that they were superstitious, afraid to risk the number 13.
Notice how Thomsen called those early A.A. members
"drunks," in spite of the fact that they weren't drunk.
None of those people had any alcohol in their bodies.
They were the successful A.A. members who had been sober for months
or years. A.A. members often call
themselves "drunks" too, even when they aren't drunk.
Such self-deprecation is supposed to be
part of the "different" A.A. humor, but it's all part of
the tacit wink-and-a-grin conspiracy to
stereotype alcoholics. A.A. members actually gladly and gleefully
participate in stereotyping
themselves, because it makes them feel different from the
"normal people", and special, and also
part of a group. (It's a propaganda mind game called "creating a
granfalloon".)
Also, promoting the idea that "we are all alike"
allows some people to avoid their own
feelings of inferiority relative to others in the group, and also
allows them to avoid assuming
personal responsibility for their past actions. It allows some
people who have been really vicious
cruel sickos to feel that nobody else is any better than them:
"Us stupid drunks, ha ha, we are all alike,
and just look at what alcohol made us do."
It's just like Flip Wilson's character Geraldine, who was always
saying, "It isn't my fault. The Devil made me do it."
In A.A.,
"Alcohol made me do it. We are all the same because alcohol made us all do bad things."
Promoting the disease concept of alcoholism, and
claiming that alcoholics can't control the disease, is just more
of the same talk, just another way to avoid taking personal
responsibility for one's own life.
|
One A.A. member recently expounded,
Sharing our many experiences with our friends in Twelve Step meetings
helps us understand how very similar we all are. We are unique only in
the sense that each of us has a special contribution to make in life,
one not quite like anyone else's.
Keeping secrets from others can make us fearful. We think, could they
really like me if they knew this? Yet we feel profound relief when we
share our most shameful secrets in a meeting and the men and women
listening to us don't blink an eye.
Jim B., in the newsgroup alt.recovery.aa, 25 May 2006.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.recovery.aa/browse_thread/thread/b5c9784ff00e9002/dae27c64e752e710#dae27c64e752e710
|
Thus, the author, Robert Thomsen, could tell the absurd story that
Alcoholics Anonymous got its name because
"no drunk was going to risk being the thirteenth anything",
and no A.A. members objected to
such nonsense. They had plenty of opportunities to object: The
author states in the forward that
he knew and worked beside Bill Wilson for the last twelve years of
Bill's life. (That means that Thomsen was almost certainly an A.A.
member, and even worked at the A.A. national headquarters, alongside
Bill Wilson.)
Many high-ranking A.A.
members, including the A.A. archivist and General Service Board
staff members helped in the
creation of the book. But it seems that none of them objected to
that line about how Alcoholics
Anonymous got its name because of the mental peculiarities or
superstitions of those early
alcoholic members. Of course not, they liked such stereotyping.
Robert Thomsen probably learned it from them.
That is especially likely in light of the fact that Thomsen's
book was based on a set of autobiographical tape recordings that Bill
Wilson made before his death. (The Hazelden "autobiography",
"Bill W.:
My First 40 Years", ostensibly written by Bill Wilson,
but actually ghost-written by Hazelden staff members,
was also based on that same set of tapes.)
So Robert Thomsen got the "Us Stupid Drunks" routine
straight from Bill Wilson.
|
It is likely that Bill Wilson's entire story about having to decide between the names
"The Way Out" and "Alcoholics Anonymous" is apocryphal, just like
so many of Bill's other stories about A.A.
history.6
The simple truth is that the Salvation Army had been using the name
"The Way Out" for their religious cure for alcoholism ever
since 1890, when General William Booth published his book,
"In Darkest England and the Way Out".
For Bill Wilson to come along in 1938 and use the same name for his book about
his "new" religious cure for alcoholism would not have been
very original, to put it mildly.
And considering how much the Salvation Army works with derelict alcoholics
and street drunks, it is extremely unlikely that all of those original
A.A. members could have been so ignorant of the Salvation Army program
and its terminology.
|

The Alcoholics Anonymous "Big Book" is loaded with
stereotypical put-downs of alcoholics:
-
Our [alcoholic] actor is self-centered -- ego-centric, as people like to call it nowadays.
He is like the retired business man who lolls in the Florida sunshine in the winter
complaining about the sad state of the nation;
the minister who sighs over the sins of the Twentieth century;
politicians and reformers who are sure all would be Utopia if the rest of the
world would only behave;
the outlaw safe cracker who thinks society has wronged him;
and the alcoholic who has lost all and is locked up.
Whatever our protestations, are not most of us concerned with ourselves,
our resentments, or our self-pity?
Selfishness -- self-centeredness! That, we think, is the root
of our troubles. Driven by a hundred forms of fear, self-delusion,
self-seeking, and self-pity, we step on the toes of our fellows
and they retaliate. ...
... the alcoholic is an extreme example of self-will run riot, though
he usually doesn't think so.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
pages 61-62.
Notice how Bill Wilson used the preacher's "we" in many of the
following quotes. A preacher will say,
"We are sinners. May God have mercy on us."
when he really means,
"You are disgusting sinners. May God have mercy on you."
Well, Bill Wilson did that a lot --
"Oh, us nasty alcoholics! We are all so bad! So stupid, so selfish, so self-seeking!
We think we are God!"
|
-
We alcoholics are undisciplined. So we let God discipline us in the
simple way we have just outlined.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
page 88.
That smacks of ego deflation with the intended goal of
breaking down a recruit's
will to resist indoctrination, and it is yet another
veiled demand for surrender
to the group. "God disciplining us" really becomes
the group and the sponsor running our lives.
Like Bill Wilson told his psychiatrist,
[A.A. members are] impersonally and severely disciplined
from without.
(A personal letter from Bill Wilson to Dr. Harry Tiebout,
9 Nov 1950, quoted in
Not-God: A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, Ernest Kurtz, page 129.)
-
More than most people, the alcoholic leads a double life.
He is very much the actor. To the outer world he presents his
stage character.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
page 73.
-
The alcoholic is like a tornado roaring his way through the lives of others.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
page 82.
-
Alcoholics being the argumentative lot that we are,
the A.A. membership will undoubtedly come up with a few who will
dispute these figures.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 399.
-
Like most sick people before me, I was implacably selfish,
and chronically self-centered.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 401.
-
An alcoholic in his cups is an unlovely creature.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition,
William G. Wilson, page 16.
-
Many alcoholics are enthusiasts. They run to extremes.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page 125.
-
Drinkers are like that.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page 9.
-
...the body of the alcoholic is quite as abnormal as his mind.
It did not satisfy us to be told that we could not control our drinking
just because we were maladjusted to life, that we were in full flight
from reality, or were outright mental defectives. These things were true
to some extent, in fact, to a considerable extent with some of us.
But we are sure that our bodies were sickened as well.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page XXIV.
-
Had we not variously worshipped people, sentiment, things,
money, and ourselves?
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page 54.
-
Actually we were fooling ourselves...
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page 55.
-
An alcoholic cannot accept the news that he's an alcoholic
unless there is a meaningful explanation given, and an offer
of help, such as you get in A.A.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 406.
-
In A.A., I have had to be torn down and then put back
together differently.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 420.
-
Even so has God restored us all to our right minds.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page 57.
-
Here I am, a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, a Fellow of
the International College of Surgeons, a diplomate of one of the great
specialty boards in these United States, a member of the American
Psychiatric Society, and I have to go to the butcher, the baker, and
the carpenter to help make a man out of me!
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 348.
(What? If you are a distinguished doctor who has a drinking problem,
you aren't really a man? Says who? Why not?
Was A.A. co-founder Dr. Robert "Bob" Smith not a real man?)
And Bill Wilson regarded alcoholics with even greater contempt when
he wrote his second book, "Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions":
-
Few indeed are the practicing alcoholics who have any idea how irrational they
are, or seeing their irrationality, can bear to face it.
Some will be willing to term themselves "problem drinkers,"
but cannot endure the suggestion that they are in fact mentally ill.
... no alcoholic ... can claim 'soundness of mind' for himself.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 33.
-
We thought "conditions" drove us to drink, and when we tried to correct these
conditions and found that we couldn't do so to our entire satisfaction, our
drinking went out of hand and we became alcoholics. It never occurred to us
that we needed to change ourselves to meet conditions, whatever they were.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 47.
"We" were really stupid, weren't we?
That was one of Bill Wilson's stranger declarations of the cause of alcoholism.
Bill had
so many different goofy "causes" of alcoholism, ranging from
nagging wives to instincts run wild.
Bill Wilson totally overlooked the simple fact that many people drink
because they feel bad and want to feel better...
And getting drunk to kill pain and feel better is most assuredly
"changing oneself to meet conditions", isn't it?
-
Alcoholics especially should be able to see that instinct run wild in
themselves is the underlying cause of their destructive drinking.
... This perverse soul-sickness is not pleasant to look upon.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 44.
-
By now the newcomer has probably arrived at the following conclusions:
that his character defects, representing instincts gone astray, have
been the primary cause of his drinking and his failure at life...
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 50.
"Instinct run wild", "Character defects",
and "instincts gone astray" -- that's three more of Bill Wilson's goofy
"primary causes of alcoholism".
-
No matter how far we have progressed, desires will always be found which oppose the grace of God.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 66.
-
Self-righeous anger also can be very enjoyable.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 67.
-
...we reluctantly come to grips with those serious character flaws that made problem
drinkers of us in the first place...
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 73.
-
We naturally congratulate ourselves on what later proves to be a far too easy and superficial
point of view. We temporarily cease to grow because we feel satisfied that
there is no need for all of A.A.'s Twelve Steps for us. We are doing fine on
a few of them.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, pages 112-113.
Now Bill really lays on the "Preacher's We" attack
("We are worthless sinners. May God have mercy on us...."):
-
... in A.A. we slowly learned that something had to be done about
our vengeful resentments, self-pity, and unwarranted pride.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 47.
-
We alcoholics are the biggest rationalizers in the world.
The A.A. Way Of Life; a reader by Bill, William G. Wilson, page 160,
and
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age, William G. Wilson, page 292.
-
We never wanted to deal with the fact of suffering. Escape via the bottle was
always our solution.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William Wilson, page 74.
-
We want to find exactly how, when, and where, our natural desires
have warped us.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William Wilson, page 43.
-
If all our lives we had more or less fooled ourselves, how could we now
be so sure that we weren't still self-deceived?
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 59.
-
As excuse-makers and rationalizers, we drunks are champions.
The A.A. Way Of Life; a reader by Bill, William G. Wilson, page 267,
and
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age, William G. Wilson, page 236.
-
How persistently we claim the right to decide all by ourselves
just what we shall think and just how we shall act.
...
We are certain that our intelligence, backed by willpower,
can rightly control our inner lives and guarantee us success in
the world we live in. This brave philosophy, wherein each man
plays God, sounds good in the speaking, but it still has to
meet this acid test: how well does it actually work?
One good look in the mirror ought to be answer enough for any
alcoholic.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, pages 36-37.
So, because you screwed up before, you must now choose slavery,
and let your sponsor and the other A.A. group old-timers
do your thinking for you and tell you what to do and what to think.
Notice how Wilson declared that simply using your own intelligence
and will power to manage your own life and take care of yourself
is "playing God". Bill claimed that God,
and only God, had the right to dictate orders to you and tell you
what to do with your life, so if you managed your own life
by using your intelligence and will power to take care of yourself,
then you were usurping God's authority.
Bill says that you don't have the right to make such decisions.
Then Wilson implied that you are mentally incompetent and
unfit to manage your own life,
so you can't do it.
You are only fit for slavery. You are only fit to be ordered
around by somebody else, like him.
But who ordered Bill Wilson around, and corrected his thinking and gave orders to him?
Nobody.
(That's another standard cult characteristic
-- the guru bosses everybody else around, but nobody bosses the guru around.)
-
But it is from our twisted relations with family, friends, and society
at large that many of us have suffered the most. We have been especially
stupid and stubborn about them.
The primary fact that we fail to recognize is
our total inability to form
a true partnership with another human being. Our egomania
digs two disastrous pitfalls. Either we insist upon dominating people
we know, or we depend on them far too much.
...
When we habitually try to manipulate others to our own willful desires,
they revolt, and resist us heavily. Then we develop hurt feelings,
a sense of persecution, and a desire to retaliate.
...
We have not once sought to be one in a family, to be a friend among friends,
to be a worker among workers, to be a useful member of society.
...
Of true brotherhood we had small comprehension.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 53.
Bill Wilson was practicing psychological projection again. He
was the one who really
exhibited those
characteristics. He was the one who
treated other people like that.
-
Sometimes, when friends tell us how well we are doing, we know
better inside. We know we aren't doing well enough. We still
can't handle life, as life is. There must be a serious flaw
somewhere in our spiritual practice and development.
Bill Wilson, AA Grapevine, June 1958.
Also see:
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, April 21.
-
We failed to see that, though adult in years, we were still behaving
childishly, trying to turn everybody -- friends, wives, husbands, even
the world itself -- into protective parents. We refused to learn that
overdependence upon people is unsuccessful because all people
are fallible, and even the best of them will sometimes let us
down, especially when our demands for attention become
unreasonable.
As Bill Sees It, Bill Wilson, page 265.
-
What are we likely to receive from Step Five? For one thing, we shall
get rid of that terrible sense of isolation we've always had.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 57.
-
To the intellectually self-sufficient man or woman many A.A.'s can say,
"Yes, we were like you -- far too smart for our own good.
... Secretly, we felt we could float above the rest of the folks
on brain power alone."
As Bill Sees It,
quotes from William G. Wilson, published by A.A.W.S., page 60.
-
Such gross misbehavior is not by any means a full catalogue of the harms we do.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 81.
-
Few people have been victimized by resentments more than alcoholics.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 90.
-
Thus blinded by prideful self-confidence, we were apt to play the big shot.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 92.
-
We can try to stop making unreasonable demands upon those we love.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 93.
-
We "constructively criticized" someone who needed it, when our real motive was
to win a useless argument. Or, the person concerned not being present, we thought
we were helping others to understand him, when in actuality our true motive
was to feel superior by pulling him down.
We sometimes hurt those we love because they need to be "taught a lesson,"
when we really want to punish.
We were depressed and complained we felt bad, when in fact we were mainly asking
for sympathy and attention. This odd trait of mind and emotion, this perverse
wish to hide a bad motive underneath a good one, permeates human affairs from
top to bottom. This subtle and elusive kind of self-righteousness can underlie
the smallest act or thought.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, pages 94-95.
-
When we insisted, like infants, that people protect and take care of
us or that the world owed us a living, then the result was
unfortunate. The people we most loved often pushed us aside or
perhaps deserted us entirely. Our disillusionment was hard to bear.
We failed to see that, though adult in years, we were still behaving
childishly, trying to turn everybody -- friends, wives, husbands, even
the world itself -- into protective parents. We refused to learn that
overdependence upon people is unsuccessful because all people
are fallible, and even the best of them will sometimes let us
down, especially when our demands for attention become
unreasonable.
As Bill Sees It,
quotes from William G. Wilson, published by A.A.W.S., page 265.
-
Even the newest of newcomers finds undreamed rewards as he tries to help
his brother alcoholic, the one who is even blinder than he.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 109.
-
Either we had tried to play God and dominate those about us, or we had insisted
on being dependent upon them.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 115.
-
Self-supporting alcoholics? Who ever heard of such a thing? Yet we find that' what
we have to be.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 160.
-
Alcoholics are certainly all-or-nothing people.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 161.
-
...our crippling handicap has been our lack of humility. ...
We never thought of making honesty, tolerance, and true love of man and God the
daily basis of living.
This lack of anchorage to any permanent values, this blindness to the true purpose
of our lives, produced another bad result. For just as long as we were convinced
that we could live by our own individual strength and intelligence, for just
that long was a working faith in a Higher Power impossible. ...
That basic ingredient of all humility, a desire to seek and do God's will,
was missing.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, pages 71-72.
Bill Wilson constantly declared that all alcoholics were just as
arrogant and egotistical as he was -- completely lacking in "humility".
Watch out. That twist on "humility" is an important redefinition.
It completely changes
the meaning of a lot of Bill's proclamations and directives.
You may have thought that all of the innocent-sounding appeals
for "humility" were just appeals to not be egotistical --
appeals to quit thinking you are better than everybody else --
but now they
get changed into demands that you spend all of your time doing
Step Eleven, "praying only for knowledge of His will for
us and the power to carry that out."
|
F.Y.I: The American Heritage Dictionary defines 'humble' as:
humble
-- adj.
- Marked by meekness or modesty in behavior, attitude, or spirit.
- Showing deferential or submissive respect.
- Of low rank or station; unpretentious: a humble cottage.
-- tr.v.
- To make lower in condition or station.
It doesn't say anything about practicing Frank Buchman's strange religion or
"surrendering to the Will of God".
Bill is just playing
cultish word-redefinition games again...
|
But you must do
"God's Will",
as defined by your sponsor
(because you are supposedly too dishonest
to correctly hear the Will of God by yourself), which ends up making
all of the appeals for humility into veiled demands that you obey the
orders of the cult elders -- the group's old-timers -- as they
interpret God's will for you:
If all our lives
we had more or less fooled ourselves, how could we
now be so sure that we weren't still self-deceived?
How could we be certain we had made a true catalog of our
defects and had really admitted them, even to ourselves?
Because we were still bothered by fear, self-pity, and hurt feelings,
it was probable
we couldn't appraise ourselves fairly at all. ...
...
At this stage, the difficulties of trying to deal rightly with
God by ourselves are two-fold. ... Somehow, being alone with
God doesn't seem as embarrassing as facing up to another person. ...
The second difficulty is this: what comes to us alone
may be garbled
by our own rationalization and wishful thinking.
The benefit of talking to another person is that we can get
his direct comment and counsel on our situation, and there can
be no doubt in our minds what that advice is.
Going it alone in spiritual matters is dangerous.
How many times have we
heard well-intentioned people claim the guidance of God when it
was all too plain that they were sorely mistaken?
Lacking both practice and humility, they had deluded themselves
and were able to justify the most arrant [sic.,sp.] nonsense
on the ground that this was what God had told them.
...
Surely then, a novice ought not lay himself open to the chance
of making foolish, perhaps tragic, blunders in this fashion.
While the comment or advice of others may be by no means infallible,
it is likely to be far more specific than any direct guidance
we may receive while we are still so inexperienced in establishing
contact with a Power greater than ourselves.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, pages 59-60.
Notice the heavy-handed use of propaganda tricks in Bill's sermon:
-
"If all our lives we had more or less fooled ourselves, how could we
now be so sure that we weren't still self-deceived?"
== That is
Assume the Major Premise.
-
"Going it alone in spiritual matters is dangerous."
and
"...a novice ought not lay himself open to the chance of making
foolish, perhaps tragic, blunders..."
== That is
Fear-mongering, Playing On Emotions.
-
"...it was probable we couldn't appraise ourselves fairly at all."
and
"...what comes to us alone may be garbled."
and
"While the comment or advice of others may be by no means infallible,
it is likely to be far more specific than any direct guidance
we may receive while we are still so inexperienced in establishing
contact with a Power greater than ourselves."
==
Those are
Sly Suggestions,
finishing up with another trick:
-
Assumption Of Facts
Not In Evidence:
"while we are still so inexperienced..."
== As if people can only contact God by doing Bill's cult religion, and no alcoholic
ever had religious experiences before following Bill's teachings.
(But what about all of those Catholic priests who ended up drinking too much
sacramental wine? Were their lives just spiritual voids before Alcoholics Anonymous?)
== And as if Bill's Buchmanite practices actually worked to give people
"contact with a Power greater than ourselves" and "spirtual experiences" and
"spiritual awakenings"...
== Oh, and who says that the sponsors really know anything about God and spirituality,
and can really hear the Voice of God better than the newcomers?
That's another groundless assumption.
And that is quite an important assumption. If we find that the sponsors are no
more spiritual or psychic than the newcomers, then that blows away Bill Wilson's
whole reason for
making the newcomers obey the "spiritual guidance" of the old-timers.
-
Bill continued his criticism of "The Generic Alcoholic":
We have had a much keener look at ourselves and those about us. We have seen
that we were prodded by unreasonable fears or anxieties into making a life
business of winning fame, money, and what we thought was leadership. So
false pride became the reverse side of that ruinous coin marked "Fear." We
simply had to be Number One people to cover up our deep-lying inferiorities.
...
True ambition is not what we thought it was. True ambition is the profound
desire to live usefully and walk humbly under the grace of God.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, pages 123, 124-125.
Of course Bill Wilson was arbitrarily redefining words again. The word "ambition"
does not mean any such thing.
-
In teaching us his methods of prayer and meditation, Bill wrote:
"Shucks!" says somebody. "This is nonsense. It isn't practical."
When such thoughts break in, we might recall, a little ruefully, how much
store we used to set by imagination as it tried to create reality out of bottles.
Yes, we reveled in that sort of thinking, didn't we?
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 100.
That is complete nonsense, just more of Bill's delusional ravings.
Our "imagination" was not trying to "create
reality out of bottles."
We did not "revel in that sort of thinking."
We drank alcohol because we wanted to feel good, period.
Bill Wilson is trying to claim that our thinking is hopelessly, permanently, broken,
just because we drank too much alcohol and got sick for a while,
so now we should all just unquestioningly accept all of his superstitious,
pseudo-mystical proclamations, including his instructions about
how to hear the Voice of God.
Here we can clearly see that the constant put-downs are a power game,
one intended to elicit submission, conformity, and obedience in the
followers of Bill.

Other pro-A.A. literature repeats the self-contempt chant:
-
People gave me many other good suggestions as well.
They suggested that I stay out of relationships. I was young
and single, and I rejected this idea out of hand.
For the first year I bounced from one sick relationship to
another. They suggested that I get a sponsor. I had no
idea what a sponsor was and I was too proud to ask, but
I was sure I didn't need one. After all, I was smarter
than the rest of these people. They might need someone to tell
them how to run their lives, but double vision, neck brace,
and all, I was doing just fine on my own.
Window of Opportunity, an excerpt from
the 4th edition Big Book, Anonymous, AA Grapevine,
December 2001, page 40.
Also:
The Big Book, 4th Edition, Window of Opportunity, page 427.
Laugh Cue!
-- Meaning: now is when all of the people at the
meeting are supposed to laugh knowingly, reflecting with
mirth and hilarity
on how stupid we have all been. For
an alcoholic to actually imagine that he could think for himself,
or run his own life without a sponsor,
or find happiness in a relationship
outside of wonderful Alcoholics Anonymous...
Ha, Ha.
How stupid could anybody be?
-
Another story in the Big Book declares:
... A man calls me on the phone. Will I take a young fellow who has been
drinking for two weeks to live with me? Soon I have others who are alcoholics
and some who have other problems.
I begin to play God. I feel that I can fix them all. ...
Nothing is right. Finances are in bad shape. I must find a way to make
some money. The family seems to think of nothing but spending. People annoy me.
...
I'll get drunk! It is a cold-blooded idea. It is premeditated. ...
I cannot see the cause of this temptation [to drink] now.
But I am to learn later that it began with my desire for material
success becoming greater than my interest in the welfare of my fellow man.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, page 507, and
The Big Book, 4th Edition, page 218.
What nonsense. That was a poor alcoholic talking, not an Enron executive.
And part of his problem was that he was caring for other alcoholics instead
of making money, and he felt that he was under a lot of pressure and stress
because of it, so he thought about taking a drink to relax. Nevertheless,
the author still had to parrot the standard "selfishness" cult dogma (but
only after another member told him that selfishness was the cause
of his unhappiness, which it obviously wasn't).
-
Terence Gorski says:
In most Twelve Step literature, the addictive self is called the "ego."
Whenever I hear or read the word ego, I substitute the words
addictive self.
The goal of a Fourth Step is to deflate the ego -- or, in other words,
to deflate the addictive self. The addictive self is marked by
grandiosity (addicted people feel that they are more than or better
than everyone else) and self-centeredness (they believe that they
are the center of the universe and there is little room left for
anyone or anything else).
Understanding the Twelve Steps, Terence T. Gorski, page 81.
That whole statement is ridiculous. Alcoholics and addicts do not get
high because they suffer from delusions of grandeur; they get high because
they feel bad and they want to feel good.
And Gorski gives us a grossly incorrect
definition
of "ego".
Nobody else uses that definition.
A more realistic definition is:
Your ego is your idea of what you are,
or,
Your ego is your opinion of yourself, including your
self-respect and your feelings of self-worth.
|
The American Heritage Dictionary defines 'ego' as:
ego
-- n.
- The self, esp. as distinct from the world and other selves.
- Psychoanal. The personality component that is conscious,
most immediately controls behavior, and is most in touch with external reality.
-
- Self-love; egotism.
- Self-confidence; self-esteem.
|
So why must your feelings of self-worth, self-confidence, self-esteem, and
self-respect be destroyed?
To burden you with guilt, to weaken your independence,
and to make you more amenable to surrender to the cult, that's why.
-
Mr. Gorski continues with the guilt-inducing party line.
(Remember that "character defects" was redefined above,
by Bill Wilson, to mean "sins".)
|
In completing Step Six you:
- Acknowledge that in sobriety your character defects often drive
you into self-defeating behaviors with problematic consequences.
- Acknowledge that your character defects give you temporary
pleasure that you enjoy.
- Identify the character defects that you are ready to give up.
- Ask for the willingness to do what is necessary to remove the
character defects that you are ready to give up.
- Identify the character defects that you are still unwilling to
give up.
- Ask for the willingness, at some time in the future, to give
up the character defects that you still choose to hold onto.
Understanding the Twelve Steps, Terence T. Gorski, page 117.
|
Character defects give you pleasure???
-
A rehash of the Big Book that targets teenage drinkers declares:
We must rid ourselves of this selfishness or it'll kill us.
It's that serious. Selfishness usually leads to relapse.
And relapse, in our case, is often fatal. Now, we can't rely
on ourselves to be rid of our self-centeredness -- it would
be rather self-centered to think we could, don't you think?
There's help. God can deliver us from our self-centeredness.
Big Book Unplugged; A Young Person's Guide to Alcoholics Anonymous,
John R., page 24.
Question:
-
What study or poll found that
"selfishness usually leads to relapse"? Where did that come from?
-
How many people participated in that study or poll? For how long?
-
How much more did the selfish people relapse than the non-selfish people?
-
How much selfishness was required to trigger a relapse?
-
How did they define and measure selfishness? Self-centeredness?
Obviously, that is just a bunch of made-up propaganda, based on nothing but
the dogma of a cult religion -- just some more parrotting
of the teachings of Bill Wilson, which he copied from the fascist cult leader
Dr. Frank N. D. Buchman, who insisted that everybody had to give up selfishness by
coming under "God-control"
-- that is, by becoming his slaves.
-
Jack Alexander, the famous
Saturday Evening Post magazine writer,
and true believer Alcoholics Anonymous convert, suggested
that Bill Wilson write to the condemned convict Caryl Chessman because he
thought that perhaps the 12-Step program could help criminals, because:
"There is a close resemblance between the criminal psychopath and the alcoholic mind.
Both are grandiose, resentful, defiant, and hating of authority; both unconsciously
destroy themselves trying to destroy others."
'PASS IT ON' The story of Bill Wilson and how the
A.A. message reached the world, Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc. staff,
1984, page 364.
Wow. Obviously, alcoholics are such terrible people that they should all be put
in San Quentin prison.
-
And a story in the AA Grapevine tells us:
"The First Step showed me that I was powerless over alcohol and anything else
that threatened my sobriety or muddled by thinking.
Alcohol was only a symptom of much deeper problems of dishonesty and denial."
Listening to the Wind, anonymous, AA Grapevine, December 2001, page 34.
Again we get Bill Wilson's lecture that alcoholics drink because they are dishonest.
The author was just parrotting Bill Wilson's rap on page 58 of the Big Book,
which declared that drinkers were "consitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves",
and "naturally incapable of grasping and developing a manner of living which
demands rigorous honesty".
-
An A.A. true believer wrote in a newsgroup that alcoholics are pretty much mental midgets:
I'd say that few alkies, especially while still drinking, can handle the concept of
quitting, even if they've tried to do just that a hundred times. Stopping...
or putting it on hold for today or right now... is something we can grasp.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.recovery.addiction.alcoholism/msg/52f7483a01340ba4
Well, since the Harvard Medical School reports that more than 50% of all alcoholics
eventually quit drinking, mostly on their own, alone,
apparently alcoholics really can handle the concept of
quitting drinking.
-
A.A. slogans say:
- "You have a thinking problem, not a drinking problem."
- "The only thing alcoholics do in moderation is the 12 steps!"
- "We're All Here Because We're Not All There."
- "I was stuck at stupid."
- "I don't have the solution - but I certainly admire the problem."
- "My plan doesn't work. All I want to do is get high."
- "Some people are so successful in recovery, they turn out to be almost
as good as they thought they were while drinking."
- "All I want is a little more than I'll ever get."
- "The most difficult thing I have ever had to do is follow the guidance I prayed for."
- "If you think you're happy, you are. If you think you're wise, you're not."
- "My life has a superb cast but I can't figure out the plot."
- "Why don't you write and give me a chance not to reply?"
- "Have a GREAT Day -- Unless you don't want to."
- "Keep It Simple, Stupid."
|
-
The pro-A.A. web site "Barefoots World" says:
We each arrived at the doors of AA with an intensive and lengthy
"History of Things That Do Not Work".
http://www.barefootsworld.net/aalibertymag1939.html
But what about all of the other things that did work? Nobody fails all of the time.
And what about all of the people who walk out of A.A. and successfully quit drinking
anyway?
What about all of the people who quit a week or two before their first A.A. meeting?
-
A story posted in the newsgroup "alt.recovery.aa" said,
...my sponsor shared with me that on the day he made five years and feeling a
bit full of himself and a little too comfortable in his sobriety, his
sponsor congratulated him and asked if he could show him those five years.
Thread: "Heavy Drinking: The Myth of Alcoholism as a Disease",
Thurs, Mar 23 2006.
-
In 1976, the Rand Corporation released a report, Alcoholism
and Treatment, R-1739-NIAAA, which stated that many
alcoholics recovered from their self-destructive drinking behavior
by tapering off into moderate drinking. A.A. and the
alcoholism treatment industry were outraged.
They claimed that publishing such information was irresponsible
and would kill many alcoholics by encouraging them to drink and not
seek treatment. They claimed that the stupid alcoholics simply
could not handle the truth, so we should not tell them the truth.
Ariel Winters reported in her book,
In a news item in the Los Angeles Times on June 12, 1976,
California members of the Alcoholism Advisory Board,
who met in San Francisco, were quoted as calling the Rand
Report "methodologically unsound and clinically
unsubstantiated. The lives of many persons with the disease
are now endangered." But Dr. Robert Moore, a San Diego,
California, physician and researcher, says that he found the
study was "carried out in a reasonable manner" and
that the critics were merely "nitpickers."
Alternatives for the Problem Drinker: A.A. Is Not The Only Way,
Ariel Winters, 1978, page 29.
Under the heading "Report Enrages Ex-alcoholic,"
Ann Landers printed a reader's letter complaining that the
statement that some alcoholics can drink again was "tantamount
to tossing a firebomb into a crowd at a football stadium."
The irate reader went on to say: "Rand deserves a kick
in the collective pants for their irresponsibility in releasing
such destructive materials." Ann Landers was "horror-stuck"
by the Rand release and added:
"I hope that enough high-powered experts in the field of
alcoholism will clobber that report sufficiently so that we
will soon be reading a retraction." She blasted the report
as being "idiotic and dangerous."
Alternatives for the Problem Drinker: A.A. Is Not The Only
Way, Ariel Winters, 1978, pages 30-31.
Morris Chafetz responded,
"The paternalistic attempt to
protect alcoholics from themselves by suppressing the
study's conclusions is a gesture of profound contempt that
only increases the social stigma alcoholics have experienced
for far too long."
Alternatives for the Problem Drinker: A.A. Is Not The Only
Way, Ariel Winters, 1978, page 33.

And Hazelden has plenty of insults for you, too:
-
Alcoholics love to wrestle with authority figures.
The Way Home, Hazelden Foundation, page 79.
("So quit resisting authority,
and surrender to the cult, darn you!")
-
Alcoholics have consistently poached on the tolerance of humankind.
The Little Red Book, Hazelden Foundation, page 57.
-
Arresting our alcoholism is not possible until we have knowledge
of our defects; therefore, we take definite steps toward correction of
our physical, mental, and spiritual disability. ...
The beginner cannot fail to be impressed with the array of flaws
he or she will uncover and wish to correct. The caution to be
observed in taking this Step is few of us are ready and willing
to surrender all of our defects. We wish to cherish a few...
The Little Red Book, Hazelden Foundation,
pages 48-49.
Once again, we see the medical-to-moral morph in action -- alcoholism isn't
caused by an allergy to alcohol, or a defective gene, or a disease, or poverty,
or even by child abuse --
alcoholism is allegedly caused by "an array" of sins, "defects of character",
and "moral shortcomings"...
And then they sneer at us and declare that we are so sinful that we wish
to "cherish" some of our "defects".
-
Mental handicaps stand between us and recovery. Our lack of
self-criticism defeats an honest evaluation of our alcoholism.
Use of the word sanity offends our false pride. We admit
our illness but rebel against questions of mental soundness.
The Little Red Book, Hazelden Foundation,
page 24.
-
Most of us saw our self-appraisals as exact; because we had conceded
to God the error of our former alcoholic thought and conduct,
we saw no need to go further. We reasoned God knew and would forgive
us, so the matter was closed.
This is sugarcoated alcoholic thinking. It follows the old pattern
and is but a pretense, a new form of escape from responsibility.
We must give our long-hoarded secrets to another person if we
are to gain peace of mind, self-respect, and recovery from alcoholism.
The Little Red Book, Hazelden Foundation,
page 68.
You must neurotically wallow in guilt, telling another
person all about your sinful defects of character and moral shortcomings,
if you wish to feel good?
And precisely how does confessing your most
embarrassing personal secrets to another person cure alcoholism?
What study, survey, or poll established that we must
give our secrets to another person in order to "gain peace of mind,
self-respect, and recovery from alcoholism"?
Who proved that to work?
(What A.A. Trustee Prof. George Vaillant and other doctors proved is that
it does not work -- that
it raises the death rate,
and
it increases the rate of binge drinking.)
And what happened to the slogan about "There are no musts in A.A., only suggestions"?

And it isn't just Alcoholics Anonymous that loves to induce guilt.
Al-Anon likewise burdens the wives of alcoholics
with masochistic self-contempt and self-doubts, so that the whole
family can be neurotic:
-
While the alcoholic picked up a drink and became drunk on alcohol,
I picked up the alcoholic and became drunk on control and approval-seeking.
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon, Al-Anon staff,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, Inc., New York, 1990,
page 254, September 10.
Also:
Hope for Today, published by Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, Inc., page 254.
-
If you're living with an alcoholic, no way you're not going to be sick yourself.
You've got all the symptoms without the glass in your hand.
Getting Better Inside Alcoholics Anonymous,
Nan Robertson, page 217.
-
The longer I am in Al-Anon, the more clearly I perceive that
alcoholism is indeed a sickness, a compulsion, an obsession. But
haven't I, too, been afflicted with a sick compulsion? Wasn't I
determined to "save" the alcoholic, and that to the
same degree as he was addicted to alcohol?
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1990, page 72.
So, ladies, if you actually want your husbands to quit drinking themselves to
death, you are some real sickos... You need to do Bill Wilson's
Twelve Steps to Buchmanism,
and get down on your knees and confess all of your sins.
-
The most important thing to consider is this: Am I desperate enough
to try the Twelve Steps, even if I don't believe anything is wrong
with me?
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1990, page 70.
"Am I desperate, irrational, and stupid enough to practice a bunch
of guilt-inducing cult religion nonsense, even though I'm not a brain-damaged
alcoholic?"
- A condescending Al-Anon slogan declares:
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts."
How Al-Anon Works for Familites and Friends of Alcoholics,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1995, page 195.
- Al-Anon continues with:
The self-searching suggested by Step Four is a long-term
undertaking. It must go on for as long as I remain blind to the flaws
which create so much trouble for me.
I must go on day after day trying to face myself as I am, and
to correct whatever is keeping me from growing into the person
I want to be.
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1990, page 70.
The lady says,
"Let's see now... The biggest flaw that is creating so much trouble for me
is my husband's suicidal drinking... It bothers me, watching him kill
himself. I guess I'd better do the Fourth
and Fifth Steps again, and list and confess my sins some more..."
-
We are told in Al-Anon that there can be no progress without humility.
This idea is confusing to many at first, and it almost always encounters
a stubborn resistance in us. "What!" we say, "am I
supposed to be a submissive slave to my situation and accept
everything that comes, however humiliating?" No. True humility
does not mean a meek surrender to an ugly, destructive way of life.
It means surrender to God's will, which is quite a different thing.
Humility prepares us for the realization of God's will for us;
it shows us the benefits we gain from doing away with self-will.
We finally understand how this self-will has actually contributed to
our distress.
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1990, page 61.
So, you got it right the first time, lady. You are supposed to be
a meek, submissive slave. You must surrender to the cult.
Remember that Bill Wilson declared that an attitude of proper
humility must include
"a desire to seek and do God's will."
(12X12, page 72.)
So all of the innocent-sounding appeals for humility are not
requests for people to avoid egotism; they are really
demands that people to give up "self-will" (taking care of yourself,
making your own decisions,
and running your own life) and "surrender to God's will"
(as "God's will" is
defined by their sponsors
and other group elders, of course).
-
When a newcomer to Al-Anon tells his or her sponsor about the
alcoholic conflict in the home, we must realize this is only one
side of the story.
At first these reports of our grievances are highly-colored and
dramatized by our confusions. A small incident may be blown up out
of all proportion to its reality; constant tension, anger and
frustration have deprived us of a rational perspective.
Growth in Al-Anon brings us to compassionate understanding of the
alcoholic's deep guilt and unhappiness. As we apply the program
day by day, we become willing to acknowledge that we, too,
must share the responsibility for the family troubles.
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1990, page 162.
What vicious, guilt-inducing lies. The housewife must accept blame
for her husband's drinking? The family troubles are her fault?
That's like Bill Wilson's rationalization that
his wife Lois' nagging him to quit drinking
is what drove him to drink. (And it was also allegedly
what drove Bill to his mistresses' beds).
It was all his wife's fault for being such a nag and a killjoy.
|
Nina Brown described living with a narcissist:
Off-loading Blame
If your partner has a Manipulative DNP [Destructive Narcissistic Personality], you are likely to be accustomed
to [his] tendency to off-load blame, and many times you are the recipient
of the blame. It doesn't matter how big or small the offense is, your
partner never accepts responsibility for mistakes as errors. Worse, you
may be blamed for things that are not your fault or are not under your
control.
This tendency to off-load blame is a manifestation of the inflated self.
Your partner feels that [he] can do no wrong and is superior. Other words
to describe this self-perception and attitude are grandiose and omnipotent.
Loving the Self-Absorbed: How to Create a More Satisfying Relationship
with a Narcissistic Partner, Nina W. Brown, Ed.D., LPC, NCC, page 123.
|
And don't you just love the part about how the housewife cannot even see clearly:
"her grievances are highly-colored and dramatized by her
confusions" -- "this is only one side of the story."?
Bill Wilson really hated his wife Lois nagging him to quit drinking
and smoking himself to death. He hated her criticizing him for
throwing drunken temper tantrums and messing around with other women,
so he struck back at her at every possible opportunity,
claiming that she couldn't see clearly, and was confused,
even writing in the
Big Book that she was silly, unspiritual, selfish, and
dishonest, while she worked in Loesser's department store to
support his crazy unemployed drunken thieving philandering ass.
|
Like the American Psychiatric Association says:
Vulnerability in self-esteem makes individuals with
Narcissistic
Personality Disorder very sensitive to "injury" from criticism or
defeat. Although they may not show it outwardly,
criticism may haunt
these individuals and may leave them feeling humiliated, degraded,
hollow and empty. They may react with disdain, rage, or defiant counterattack.
DSM-IV-TR == Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision;
Published by the American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC. 2000;
pages 658-661.
|
Bill Wilson was so arrogant that he didn't consider his wife
Lois qualified to even have an opinion about him, and he was so thin-skinned that he just
couldn't tolerate her criticizing him at all, so he routinely counter-attacked
and put her down.
And even today, Bill's fawning followers in Al-Anon still parrot Bill's
denunciations of 'the wife':
-
"You are just a silly housewife, suffering from 'confusions'...
-
"When you think that your husband is getting drunk and yelling and
throwing drunken raging temper tantrums
and tearing up the house
and kicking out the door panels
and throwing a sewing machine at you,
and then stealing money out of your purse to go buy more booze,
and drinking himself to death...
-
"Well, that isn't really what he is doing.
-
"You are confused. Your vision is highly colored. You are just a
nagging killjoy housewife who is blowing things out of all proportion."
- And Al-Anon continues to teach, with
biting sarcasm and condescension,
how the husband's alcoholism is really all the wife's fault:
Once upon a time there was an Enormous Thumb belonging to a woman with
an Alcoholic Husband and Three Teenaged Children.
The four of them lived under her thumb, so of course they couldn't
do much growing up. Often their spirits writhed under the weight;
every time they tried to get out from under, they'd do something
wrong and the thumb would clamp down on them again.
Father managed by keeping himself flattened out drunk most of the
time; he was so cute about escaping to a bottle that, no matter how
much mama watched, she couldn't catch him at it until he'd drunk
himself into unconsciousness. Everyone thought she was a Very Nice
Lady, and they were sorry she was having such a hard time with
her family.
There was really no reason for her to come to Al-Anon to solve her
problems because she always knew just what to do about everything.
But she did want to make her husband stop drinking, so she thought
she'd try it. She was quite unhappy at first because some of the
members were not inclined to Pull any Punches. She was quite
indignant when they tried to show her what she was doing to her
family, but to everyone's amazement the Thumb began to shrink
and lose weight, and things looked brighter.
More and more she realized what she was doing and, being a
Determined Character, she applied the program every day and
her other problems took care of themselves very nicely.
One Day At A Time In Al-Anon,
Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, 1990, page 286.
Yes, Mrs. Housewife, you are such a bitch. It's all
your own fault that your husband drinks alcohol
while you keep the
family together. But if you just practice Bill Wilson's
12-Step religion and grovel and confess enough, your husband will stop drinking.
By the way, that condemnation of the wife really is alcoholic thinking codified into
formal 12-Step church dogma.
Some alcoholics rationalize their drinking with complaints to their wives like,
"You've been nagging me all day long. I did the only thing I could
do -- drink to block you out!"
So, by that logic, it is the wife's fault that the guy drinks too much.
And the housewives who are fooled by that routine will feel guilty and say things
like,
"I should't be so hard on him. He'll get over it. It's just a phase
he's going through..."2
Alas, it ain't necessarily so.
|

A.A.W.S. (Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.) publishes
plenty of stereotypical put-downs of alcoholics too (in addition to Bill Wilson's).
The following confessions make heavy use of the technique of
"I'm saying 'I' but I mean 'you', because us stupid
alcoholics are all alike, and you also need to learn what I learned..."
-
When I came to A.A. my spiritual life was bankrupt; if I considered
God at all, He was to be called upon only when my self-will was
incapable of a task or when overwhelming fears had eroded my ego.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, page 314, November 1.
-
An admission of personal powerlessness over alcohol is a cornerstone of
the foundation of recovery. I've learned that I do not have the power
and control I once thought I had.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, page 11, January 3.
-
It's the side of myself that I refuse to look at that rules me.
I must be willing to look at the dark side in order to
heal my mind and heart because that is the road to freedom.
I must walk into darkness to find the light and walk into fear
to find peace.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, May 1.
-
For so many years my life revolved solely around myself.
I was consumed with self in all forms -- self-centeredness,
self-pity, self-seeking, all of which stemmed from pride.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, page 71, March 3.
-
I allowed selfishness to run rampant in my life.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, page 326, November 13.
-
Some of us have spent many years trying not to grow up. ...
Prayer for the Day: Higher Power, help me grow up into a happy, grateful adult.
Action for the Day: There are happy grown-ups. I'll find one to be my sponsor.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, April 26.
-
When I did my personal inventory I found that I had
unhealthy relationships with most people in my life-
my friends and family, for example.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, April 24.
-
If we were to live, we had to be free of anger. The grouch
and the brainstorm were not for us. They may be the dubious
luxury of the normal men, but for alcoholics these things
are poison.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members for A.A. members,
Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990, April 26.
So ordinary people can handle anger, but those wimpy brain-damaged alcoholics cannot?
-
My higher power created me for a purpose in life. ...
God has allowed me the right to be wrong in order for our Fellowship to
exist as it does today.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members
for A.A. members, Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990,
page 311, October 29, and page 306, October 24.
"Higher Power" created me for a purpose, and God says that my purpose
in life is to be wrong so that A.A. can be right?
God gave me the right to be wrong?
That is some strange twisted Calvinism -- you are doomed, predestined
to be wrong, the day that you are born. The purpose of your life is to be wrong.
Why didn't God give me the right to be right?
Especially, why didn't God give me the right to be right without Alcoholics Anonymous?
HINT: I think He did.
-
The last three steps invoke God's loving discipline upon my willful nature.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members
for A.A. members, Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990,
page 317, November 4.
Such masochistic nonsense... Break out the black leather and the whips and call Donna the Dominatrix.
-
When I prayed, I used to omit a lot of things for which I needed to be forgiven.
I thought that if I didn't mention these things to God, He would never know about them.
Daily Reflections; A Book of Reflections by A.A. members
for A.A. members, Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc., 1990,
page 185, June 25.
(Aren't us alcoholics really silly and stupid? Ha ha.)

Then Bill Wilson fired some more shots at the stereotypical alcoholic:
-
I thought of talking about the good old days because, you see, the
alcoholic doesn't like to live any place but in the past.
Bill Wilson, in a speech given at a Spiritual
Healing Seminar, March 25th, 1954, in New York.
-
Most of the alcoholics ... were still childish,
emotionally sensitive, and grandiose.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, page 123.
Yes, that is an accurate description of William Griffith Wilson, but
not everybody else. In fact, that is exactly how
Dr. Harry Tiebout,
Bill's psychiatrist, diagnosed Bill Wilson:
"he had been trying to live out the
infantilely grandiose demands of 'His Majesty the
Baby.'"
Again, we are seeing Bill Wilson practicing
psychological projection --
accusing others of having the very character flaws that he
himself exhibited, and accusing others of committing the sins
and crimes of which he was guilty.
-
We "constructively criticized" someone who needed it,
when our real motive was to win a useless argument. Or, the person
concerned not being present, we thought we were helping others
to understand him, when in actuality our true motive was to feel
superior by pulling him down. We sometimes hurt those we love
because they need to be "taught a lesson," when we
really wanted to punish. We were depressed and complained we felt
bad, when in fact we were mainly asking for sympathy and attention.
This odd trait of mind and emotion, this perverse wish to hide
a bad motive underneath a good one, permeates human affairs from
top to bottom.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, page 94.
Such a poisonous hatred of life and the human race.
It is easy to see why Bill Wilson was suffering from an 11-year-long
spell of deep, crippling, clinical depression when he wrote
that.3
Wilson just went on and on, ranting and raving about how bad we all are...
Poor old Bill was really insane.
-
If our tempers are consistently bad, we arouse anger in others.
If we lie or cheat, we deprive others not only of their worldly
goods, but of their emotional security and peace of mind.
We really issue them an invitation to become contemptuous
and vengeful. If our sex conduct is selfish, we may excite
jealousy, misery, and a strong desire to retaliate in kind.
Such gross misbehavior is not by any means a full catalogue of
the harms we do.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, page 94.
This is just a never-ending assault on any few shreds of
self-respect or feelings of self-worth that A.A. members may have left.
It's guilt induction to the max. No wonder A.A. has such a high suicide rate.
-
Since defective relations with other human beings have nearly
always been the immediate cause of our woes, including our
alcoholism, no field of investigation could yield more
satisfying and valuable rewards than this one.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, page 81.
So now alcoholism is caused by "defective relations", is it?
Earlier, Bill Wilson declared that our self-destructive drinking
was caused by our sins,
moral shortcomings, defects of character,
instincts run wild, instinct gone astray,
self-will run riot, self-seeking, selfishness,
desires that far exceed their intended purpose,
and
failure to
practice religious precepts properly...
What will it be next?
(Hint: "Natural desires warping us" and
nagging wives.)

Mr. Wilson even claimed that the Twelve Steps had to be written
because alcoholics were so dishonest. While writing the Big
Book, he had this problem:
Well, we finally got to the point where we really had to say what this
book was all about and how this deal works. As I told you this had been a
six-step program then.
...
The idea came to me, well, we need a definite statement of
concrete principles
that these drunks can't wiggle out of. There can't be any wiggling out
of this deal at all and this six-step program had two big gaps
which people wiggled out of.
-- Bill Wilson, Transcribed from tape, Fort
Worth, 1954, was on
http://www.a1aa.com/more%2012steps.htm
[Dead Link]
Bill Wilson considered his fellow alcoholics to be such a bunch of
dishonest slippery cheaters that they had to be
locked into an iron-clad contract
from which no escape was possible, or else those
drunken bums would "wiggle out of" the "spiritual"
work. That's a pretty poor opinion of your fellow A.A. members.
How can A.A. be such a wonderful organization if the members are
all so bad?
And note that A.A. was not a democracy, or an easy-going self-help
group of equals. A.A. was a dictatorship run by Bill Wilson, who locked
the alcoholics into contracts that they couldn't "wiggle out of".
In his second book, Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
Wilson even declared that alcoholics are such worthless, immoral louts
that they must be beaten into submission:
Why all this insistence that every A.A. member must hit bottom first?
The answer is that few people will sincerely try to practice the A.A.
program unless they have hit bottom. For practicing A.A.'s remaining
eleven Steps means the adoption of attitudes and actions that almost
no alcoholic who is still drinking can dream of taking. Who wishes to
be rigorously honest and tolerant?
Who wants to confess his faults to another and make restitution for
harm done? Who cares anything about a Higher Power, let alone
meditation and prayer? Who wants to sacrifice time and energy in
trying to carry A.A.'s message to the next sufferer? No, the average
alcoholic, self-centered in the extreme, doesn't care for this
prospect -- unless he has to do these things in order to stay
alive himself.
Under the lash of alcoholism, we are driven to A.A., and there
we discover the fatal nature of our situation.
Then, and only then, do we become as open-minded to conviction and
as willing to listen as the dying can be.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 24.
So, alcoholics are such bad people that they don't want to do good
or be good?
- "Who wishes to be rigorously honest and tolerant?"
- "Who cares anything about a Higher Power, let alone
meditation and prayer?"
- "Who wants to sacrifice time and energy in trying to
carry A.A.'s message to the next sufferer?"
- "No, the average alcoholic, self-centered in the
extreme, doesn't care for this prospect..."
- Alcoholics are not willing to admit their faults and convict
themselves of sins and spiritual crimes until they are close to death.
- Only then will they become "open-minded" to the idea of
joining a cult religion like Buchmanism, and "convicting" themselves
of numerous sins.
[A.A. members are] impersonally and severely disciplined
from without.
(A personal letter from Bill Wilson to Dr. Harry Tiebout,
9 Nov 1950, quoted in
Not-God: A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, Ernest Kurtz, page 129.)
We saw we needn't always be bludgeoned and beaten into humility.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, William G. Wilson, page 75.
"Gee, thank you Massuh. You mean that today I can grovel before you
without getting whipped? You are so kindly, Massuh, even if it is
just for today."
In 1955, at the A.A. twentieth anniversary convention, Bill Wilson said,
...drinkers would not take pressure in any form, excepting from John
Barleycorn himself. They always had to be led, not pushed. They
would not stand for the rather
aggressive evangelism of the Oxford Group. And they
would not accept the principle
of "team guidance" for their own personal lives.
It was too authoritarian for them. In other respects, too, we
found we had to make haste slowly.
When first contacted, most alcoholics just wanted to find
sobriety, nothing else. They clung to their other defects,
letting go only little by little. They simply did not want to
get "too good too soon."
The Oxford Groups' absolute concepts -- absolute purity, absolute
honesty, absolute unselfishness, and absolute love -- were frequently
too much for the drunks. These ideas had to be fed with teaspoons
rather than by buckets.
Besides, the Oxford Groups' "absolutes" were expressions
peculiar to them. This was a terminology which might continue
to identify us in the public mind with the Oxford Groupers, even
though we had completely withdrawn from their fellowship.
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age, William G. Wilson, pages 74-75,
and
Not-God: A History of Alcoholics Anonymous, Ernest Kurtz, page 46.
Note the deception inherent in that program:
-
Bill Wilson believed that he could foist Oxford Group theology --
Buchmanism --
on his followers, and they wouldn't know it if he changed the names of things
like The Four Absolutes.
-
The old-timers dispense the truth about Alcoholics Anonymous to the beginners
"by teaspoons, not buckets."
Newcomers learn the true nature of the Alcoholics Anonymous
program only a tiny bit at a time.
-
They won't find out what membership in the group really entails until they
are committed members and well-indoctrinated, and attending meetings has
become a habit.
-
That is
deceptive
recruiting, another standard cult characteristic.
Bill Wilson even faulted alcoholics for not liking the fascism
inherent in
Frank Buchman's cult religion:
"It was too authoritarian for them."
So, according to Bill Wilson, you should even feel guilty and
inadequate for not liking authoritarian fascism -- you wish to
"cling to your other defects."
Frank Buchman's cult used the very same technique -- that is where
Bill Wilson learned it -- they accused anyone
who dared to criticize Frank Buchman, his teachings, or his pro-Nazi politics,
of being immoral and sinful: guilty of
"perhaps the
rationalization of some grave hidden weakness or the sin of jealousy or
laziness or cowardice" --
"...opposition to Moral Re-Armament has special significance.
It always comes from the morally defeated".
And of course Bill Wilson assumed that he was spiritual enough to handle
high-falutin' morality like The Four Absolutes, even if the average A.A. member was
just a stupid loser who didn't want to get too good too soon.

Obviously, William Wilson had nothing but hatred and contempt for
his fellow alcoholics. I know that that directly contradicts the conceit
that Bill spent the second half of his life selflessly helping other
alcoholics and serving their needs like some great self-sacrificing saint.
He didn't; he spent the second half of his life building a cult religion,
making himself the leader, and making other alcoholics his
fawning followers and brown-nosing slaves who supported him in
luxurious comfort for the rest of his life.
Bill Wilson got a free house in the country
("Stepping Stones"), a free Cadillac car,
and enough money that he never had to work again,
as well as
countless mistresses,
while he exhorted all
of the other alcoholics to abandon self-seeking, to quit being so
selfish, and to give up all thought of the profit motive.
Bill Wilson even wanted the national Alcoholics Anonymous headquarters to
pay his mistress, Helen Wynn,
for him, but they balked at that one,
and told Bill to pay her himself.
Bill was furious at their effrontery.
The first two standard rules of any cult are:
1) The guru is always right.
2) You are always wrong.
The greater the guru is, the less you are. The guru and his teachings
are above questioning, and you are completely unqualified --
too stupid, too ignorant, too unspiritual, too sinful, too evil, too new --
to judge the guru or his teachings. The properly-behaved
followers never question the guru; they accept their subservient role.
The guru criticizes the followers, but they never criticize the guru.
But the average alcoholic "out on the streets" would
not believe in Bill Wilson's grandiose delusions, or join his
cult religion, or follow his orders, or even agree with him,
so Bill hated them and spoke of them with nothing but sneering
contempt:
Let's look first at the
case of the one who says he won't believe -- the belligerent
one. He is in a state of mind which can be described only as
savage.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, Page 25.
... we agnostics and atheists chose to believe
that our human intelligence was the last word...
Rather vain of us, wasn't it?
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
page 49.
Neither was the average alcoholic
"as open-minded to conviction
and as willing to listen as the dying can be"
-- that is, eager to masochistically Convict himself,
to find himself guilty of sins.
This is another one of the peculiarities of
Frank Buchman's sick cult
religion slipping into Alcoholics Anonymous, again --
Conviction, one of the
"Five C's".
Under the lash of alcoholism, we are driven to A.A., and there
we discover the fatal nature of our situation.
Then, and only then, do we become as open-minded to conviction and
as willing to listen as the dying can be.
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,
William G. Wilson, page 24.
Only the truly desperate, dying people could be
made to do what Bill Wilson wanted,
so, according to Bill, those horrible evil alcoholics had to
be beaten with the lash of alcoholism, and forced to do the good
and right thing -- to join A.A., and surrender their minds to the group,
and do Bill's Twelve Steps, and Convict themselves of all kinds of sins...
I have sat in A.A. meetings, and heard people share the
"wisdom" that all alcoholics have
short fuses, and are quick to anger, and have little ability to
tolerate frustration or pain. I've also
heard that all alcoholics are selfish and care about nothing but
drinking and getting their own creature comforts.
I've also heard that all alcoholics become violent brutes when they
get drunk, and beat up their friends and wives and kids.
But that doesn't match my own experiences at all.
It doesn't match even half of the alcoholics I've known.
It does match a rare few, but only a very rare few.
But new A.A. members get indoctrinated with such ideas as soon
as they start attending
meetings. You just wanted to quit drinking, and now you are
being told what all of your standard
character defects (sins) are? And if you object, and say that you
aren't like that, your sponsor or
another elder is liable to accuse you of being in denial about your
true nature. Somehow, I don't think
that is helpful. In fact, I believe that it is very harmful to
a lot of people.
The A.A. coins say,
"To thine own self be true",
not
"Use this coin to buy stereotypes of yourself."

It's interesting to note that A.A. isn't alone in this habit of
applying negative stereotypes to alcoholics and drug addicts. Chuck
Dederich, the leader of the drug and alcohol recovery program turned
crazy cult called Synanon, said,
"Addicts are emotional children who won't gamble.
Addicts, like children, want a sure thing."
The Tunnel Back, Synanon, Lewis Yablonsky,
page 398.
This is obviously false, totally untrue, and complete nonsense.
Addicts take crazy chances, totally insane chances,
and live lives of great uncertainty,
and often lose their lives on a bad gamble, like,
"I think I can do this much without overdosing. This isn't too
much, is it?" or
"I think he gave me smack, not cleanser, so I'll shoot it and see."
Another Synanon member echoed the attack on Synanon members:
"You lifestylers are so goddamn dumb that you think the
Synanon miracle
has no limitations -- not true! When you are up against nine-fingered
cats like me -- you are dealing with 'damaged goods'.
Can't you get that through your skull? Give a dopefiend an inch
and he'll take your ruler. Bring something broken in two pieces
to one of our Homer Half-Heads and say 'Fix it,' and he'll return
it to you in four pieces, exulting that 'It's fixed!' It may interest
you to know that management has, in fact, decided to eliminate
repair jobs from our service stations. The risk is just too great.
The Peter Principle of our monkies is exceeded when they are asked
to do more than get the gas in the right hole."
Escape From Utopia: My Ten Years in Synanon, William F. Olin,
page 139.
It's interesting to note that those remarks were addressed to the
author, William F. Olin,, a "life-styler" who was a successful architect
outside of Synanon
-- a non-addict who joined Synanon for the Utopian communal lifestyle.
And Synanon also had another member who was a doctor, and
there were many more members with professional skills.
But according to that condescending speaker, all Synanon members were stupid dope
fiends who couldn't be trusted with anything more complex than
pumping gasoline.
Such denigration of the addict is just another way for the cult or its
leader to control the individual members by making them feel small and
inferior. Calling them "children" enhances the effect of
making the leader more powerful and the followers weaker. In
some cults, like Reverend Jim Jones' People's Temple (the one where
914 people committed suicide for Jones),
the leader was even called "Father," while he called the
followers "my children."
Bill Wilson had the same condescending attitude towards his fellow alcoholics:
We shall have our childish spats and snits over small questions of money
management and who is going to run our groups for the next six months.
Any bunch of growing children (and that is what we are) would hardly be in
character if they did less.
The A.A. Way Of Life; a reader by Bill, William G. Wilson, page 143,
and
Alcoholics Anonymous Comes Of Age, William G. Wilson, page 233.
Bill Wilson used the same wording when he explained how everyone had to be
"controlled by God", which is
pure Buchmanism.
Wilson denounced taking care of yourself and
being free to live your own life as
"playing God":
First of all, we had to quit playing God. It didn't work. Next, we
decided that hereafter in this drama of life, God was going to be our
Director. He is the Principal; we are His agents. He is the Father, and we are
His children. ...
... We had a new Employer.
The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson,
Chapter 5, How It Works, pages 62-63.
But being "controlled by God" ended up being
"controlled by the
A.A. elders" who interpret the neophytes'
"Guidance" for them, and tell
them what God really says.

I strongly suspect that a big part of the reason for this "Us Stupid
Drunks" routine is to break down the ego of the new convert,
to subvert his will to resist.
The newcomer won't surrender
to the cult until he despairs of saving himself.
The newcomer must believe that he is incapable of helping himself,
that he is so flawed and broken and defective that he has to give up
on himself, and believe that something, some Power greater than himself,
like the group or God, will fix him.
Many parts of the program are designed to break down the newcomer's mind,
will, and self-confidence, by inducing guilt and self-doubt,
and this "Us Stupid Drunks" conspiracy is one of them.
Note that there is a strong power game going on in the "Us Stupid
Drunks" conspiracy. At a meeting, the speaker will denigrate
himself, and list all of his terrible character flaws and shortcomings.
He tells the tale of his horrible alcoholic history and all of the
bad things that he did.
He makes himself unassailable by doing that.
You cannot very well then jump on him and accuse him of being a sack
of motherfuckers. He just said that he was. But then a subtle mind
game starts: the speaker implies that you are just as bad.
"Alcoholics are like that," he says, and everybody around you grins
and nods.
(And they might say that he is being completely honest, and if
you would be completely honest too, then you would admit that you also had
such defects of character and moral shortcomings.)
But then he claims or implies that because he has been
working on the problem for many years, with the help of A.A., he has
made at least some small amount of
progress in overcoming the problem. But you, you immoral newcomer,
you have not. So he is your moral superior, and you should
surrender
your will to him and let him be your sponsor and tell you what to
do with your life.
(And then there is the threat that if you won't conform and follow the
program, your fate will be "Jails, Institutions, or Death".)

The Alcoholics Anonymous literature teaches self-contempt and self-loathing.
One of the saddest examples of this is Bill Wilson's second book,
Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions.
By the time Bill wrote that, in 1952, he was deep into his
madness,
in the middle of an eleven-year bout of deep, crippling,
clinical depression, and he just raved hatred of alcoholics
nonstop for 192 pages. He had jewels of self-contempt
and self-loathing like this to offer to newcomers:
Now let's ponder the need for a list of the more glaring personality defects
all of us have in varying degrees. To those who have religious training,
such a list would set forth serious violations of moral principles.
Some others will think of this list as defects of character.
Still others will call it an index of maladjustments.
Some will become quite annoyed if there is talk about immorality, let alone sin.
But all who are in the least reasonable will agree upon one point: that there
is plenty wrong with us alcoholics about which plenty will have to be
done if we are to expect sobriety, progress, and any real ability to cope with life.
To avoid falling into confusion over the names these defects should be called,
let's take a universally recognized list of major human failings -- the Seven
Deadly Sins of pride, greed, lust, anger, gluttony, envy, sloth. It is not
by accident that pride heads the procession. For pride,
leading to self-justification, and always spurred by conscious or
unconscious fears, is the basic breeder of most human difficulties,
the chief block to true progress. Pride lures us into making demands upon
ourselves or upon others which cannot be met without perverting or misusing
our God-given instincts. When the satisfaction of our instincts
for sex, security, and society becomes the sole object of our lives, then
pride steps in to justify our excesses.
All these failings generate fear, a soul-sickness in its own right.
Then fear, in turn, generates more character defects. Unreasonable
fear that our instincts will not be satisfied drives us to covet the
possessions of others, to lust for sex and power, to become angry when
our instinctive demands are threatened, to be envious when the ambitions
of others seem to be realized which ours are not. We eat, drink, and grab
for more of everything than we need, fearing we shall never have enough.
And with genuine alarm at the prospect of work, we stay lazy. We loaf and
procrastinate, or at least work grudgingly and under half steam. These fears
are the termites that ceaselessly devour the foundations of whatever sort of
life we try to build.
Twelve St |