Albert Ellis wrote the book: "Why AA Doesn't Work: Rational Steps to Quitting Alcohol" (1992)
"If a disease caused your poor behavior in the past, why would a disease decide to stop doing so now? Well, because now, knowing that I have a disease, I can take responsibility for my own behavior from here on out. Or, I first have to admit I am powerless over my disease and that gives me the power to take responsibility & control it now. These arguments seem illogical to many people. What kind of disease could make you drink until you find out you have it, and then if only you accept your powerlessness & higher power, will let you take responsibility & control? What disease knows that you have now made a pact with a higher power & that it had damned well better surrender its power to make you powerless and submit to you & the higher power? The answer is that this is a "special disease" made up for the occasion and useful in reducing self-blame. In 1935, when AA adopted the idea, it was distinctly better than the idea that heavy drinkers were morally defective."
massive's comment was perfect, but she can speak for herself. Great show BTW. ;)
Comments
causeandeffect
Thu, 07/19/2012 - 07:25
Permalink
This represents yet another
This represents yet another AA contradiction. You have a disease so you aren't morally defective, so get down on your knees and pray to God™ that he remove all the defects of character that make you drink, or you will never be able to get or stay sober.
Furthermore, the idea that addiction is caused by either a disease or character defects is a false dichotomy. It can happen to anyone who uses a substance too much.
Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson