Carl Jung, the cultist that made Bill Wilson, the man behind the cult of Alcoholics Anonymous proud of "ONE" letter

Carl Jung is often touted by the AA faithful cult members as agreeing with Bill Wilson and his plans to make the "Secret Society" of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Who was Carl Jung and what was his agenda?

Much has been said about the "work" of Carl Jung, but is it all good? Did Carl Jung start his own mind control cult? Did Carl Jung, believe in the Occult practices like Bill Wilson of Alcoholics Anonymous Infamy? Why would the AA faithful even want to be associated with him? Do a little research and you will find a surprise!

"The Jung Cult : Origins of a Charismatic Movement" (ISBN-13: 978-0684834238)
"The Aryan Christ: The Secret Life of Carl Jung" (ISBN-13: 978-0679449454)
"Cult Fictions: C. G. Jung and the Founding of Analytical Psychology" (ISBN-13: 978-0415186148)
"Jung Stripped Bare: By His Biographers, Even" (ISBN-13: 978-1855753174)
"Jung the Mystic: The Esoteric Dimensions of Carl Jung's Life and Teachings " (ISBN-13: 978-1585427925)

Then of course we have the Jungian Manifesto called "The Red Book", currently on sale at Amazon for a mere $118.70 (ISBN-10: 0393065677, ISBN-13: 978-0393065671)

The most influential unpublished work in the history of psychology. When Carl Jung embarked on an extended self-exploration he called his “confrontation with the unconscious,” the heart of it was The Red Book, a large, illuminated volume he created between 1914 and 1930. Here he developed his principle theories—of the archetypes, the collective unconscious, and the process of individuation—that transformed psychotherapy from a practice concerned with treatment of the sick into a means for higher development of the personality.

While Jung considered The Red Book to be his most important work, only a handful of people have ever seen it. Now, in a complete facsimile and translation, it is available to scholars and the general public. It is an astonishing example of calligraphy and art on a par with The Book of Kells and the illuminated manuscripts of William Blake. This publication of The Red Book is a watershed that will cast new light on the making of modern psychology.

Does anyone know if Carl Jung has any ties to Aldus Huxley, Gerald Heard and Jim Jones of the People's Temple of the Koolaid confession ritual and what they are?

Comments

JR Harris's picture

What are the links to the cult of Alcoholics Anonymous?

The End of the World Cult - http://watchdocumentary.com/watch/the-end-of-the-world-cult-video_f63906...

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

avogadno's picture

Surprisingly there are many conspiracy's associated with Carl Jung he affiliated himself with several movements including the rage over LSD

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

JR Harris's picture

Jung believed that just as the human race all started out pagan and only later, having lost touch with its pagan roots, became rootless, "civilized" and Christian, so Germans start out, in infancy, as spontaneous pagans, but this spontaneous religion is overlaid with the artificial ideas of monotheism. Our loss of wholeness is a loss of contact with these roots. But we can reach these roots, not by the difficult work of historical research but by going inward, digging below the personal unconscious and uncovering the collective unconscious that had only been covered over.

When Jung discovered Freud's method of psychoanalysis, he quickly saw it as a tool to uncover hidden resources buried within. But while Freud welcomed Jung into the psychoanalytic movement, he soon noted that Jung was uncritical of myth. He began to fear Jung would compromise the attempt to assert scientific standing for psychoanalysis. This led eventually to the Freud-Jung split. Jung retained from Freud the cult atmosphere of the analytic movement and the lack of rigorous testing of hypotheses. Unlike Freud, Jung claimed that his analytic methods could investigate a inner realm with essentially religious meaning.

Jung explained the resistance of Freud and his close followers to Jung's version of analysis in an essentially racist way. The Freudians were mostly Jews, as was Freud himself. Freudians are uninterested in pagan myths, Jung decided, because they are mostly Jews. The Jews came from the Middle East, which was urbanized and thus depaganized at an early date. Jews had allegedly lost their pagan roots so long ago that they no longer had access to the collective unconscious. By contrast, Germanic peoples had lost their paganism at a relatively late date, roughly 500 to 1100 AD. Thus the pagan collective unconscious lay close enough to the psychological surface that it could still be dug up if only one were persistent enough. Since for Jung being in touch with the collective unconscious is a precondition for psychological health, Germanic types like himself are potentially healthier than Jews.

This idea is scientifically unsound, as it confuses what can be learned with what can be biologically inherited. It also links psychological health more to one ethnic group than another and could easily provide a rationale for anti- Semitism. Jung tended to think of the collective unconscious in racial terms until late in his life. About 1936, when he was already 60, he realized that a stress on this aspect of his thought would not go over well in the English speaking world where Jung thought he could find the greatest number of disciples. In fact, his views about an essentially Aryan collective unconscious put him close to the kinds of things that Hitler was saying.

http://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/jung_talk.htm

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

"The Clever Devils Concoct the Master Plan"

The following story is meant as a parable. A parable in this sense is not like a fable of Aesop. It will not explicitly tell you its moral. It hopes to provoke thought and to promote understanding indirectly. Readers must interpret the parable themselves. There may be more than one satisfactory interpretation.

(snip)

"Not a big problem," said Sofismo. "Our local agents can ridicule as a conspiracy theorist anyone who points this out. Our tools in the universities can say that the global trading and financing schemes just evolved by trial and error. They can claim that these schemes were never designed by anybody or any committee. After all, no human being has ever attended one of our meetings. As powerful and destructive as we are, nobody has ever seen us. A few folks might decipher how we run the world, but they are handicapped by their lack of belief in devils, which they label superstition. On the other hand, humans who do believe in devils never think of us operating on a truly grand scale. They imagine us tempting people to engage in premarital sex, have abortions, smoke pot, or plagiarize term papers. They do not realize that real devils have much bigger fish to fry."

http://www.wku.edu/~jan.garrett/parables/clvrdvls.htm

JR Harris's picture

Yet Jung only offered the appearance of a scientific approach through his psychological system, for in actuality it carefully camouflaged religious and philosophical ideas disguised as science. This system in fact forms a major taproot of today’s New Age thought: occult mysticism disguised as psychological science.

Because many of Freud's and Jung's concepts are foundational to current New Age (or “interspirituality”) thinking, it is essential to understand that their popular schools of psychotherapy (often called dynamic psychiatry) are rooted in anti-Christian thought. Henri Ellenberger, psychiatrist and author of a massive history of dynamic or depth psychology, concludes that:

"It is impossible to overestimate Nietzsche's influence on dynamic psychiatry... Nietzsche may be considered the common source of Freud, Adler, and Jung."[i]

Frederick Nietzsche was an anti-Christian German philosopher who exalted paganism and the worship of instinct. Adolf Hitler and Nazism drank heavily from Nietzsche’s work.

Movies like Indiana Jones and Star Wars, as well as many popular psychotherapies and holistic medical concepts, reflect the widespread yet subtle influence of Jungian thought in the United States. Space does not permit a sociological analysis of secular society, however. What concerns us is the wide acclaim and high esteem that much of contemporary Christianity accords him and his thinking.

Three well known figures in particular have popularized Jung’s work in the Church: Joseph Campbell (a world religions scholar featured on the PBS series, Joseph Campbell and Myth); Morton Kelsey, an Episcopal priest and university professor, whose popular book The Other Side of Silence promotes Eastern meditation and occultism for Christians; and psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, author of The Road Less Traveled, which teaches that the unconscious is god.

Almost universally people regard Jung as a wise man—and in many churches a saint. Attack St. Paul and you'll be called thoughtful, but criticize Jung and you'll often be dubbed a "fundamentalist" (i.e., an ignorant bigot).

But the Bible states that true wisdom comes from the fear ["awesome regard"] of the Lord (Proverbs 1:7). Did Jung's "wisdom" come from that? No—and for a number of reasons.

Source: http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/08/nathan/jung.htm

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

Jung broke from Freud over a number of differences but mainly over his mysticism. I never bothered reading much of Jung - and Fromm, Horney, Adler didn't refer to his work much. Neither did the great humanist philosopher psychiatrist Thomas Szasz who seems to know whose who in the whole evolution of psychoanalysis/psychiatry. Mortimore Adler use to be called "the poor man's philosopher" and I bet someone at one time called Jung "the drunken bums philosopher".

Anthro

alkieanon's picture

Anthro says: "... I bet someone at one time called Jung "the drunken bums philosopher"." Yes, you just did. And "there is more than meets the eye" regarding Jung.

JR Harris's picture

There is a lot more than meets the eye with Carl Junk. Who does he see as the "master race" and why..... dig deeper.

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

There is a lot more than meets the eye with Carl Jung. Who does he see as the "Wise Old Man" and why..... dig deeper.

JR Harris's picture

Jung claimed the Jewish race was inferior. Carl Jung was a Nazi sympathizer and believed the Aryan German race was a master race. Did deeper... I have provided links to this information above, you have provided nothing.

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

JR Harris says: "Did deeper... I have provided links to this information above, you have provided nothing." You have provided links to opinions, not facts, you have provided nothing.

JR Harris's picture

Dr. D. Russell discusses the infiltration and agenda of satanic mind control and it's connection to the MBTI, Carl Jung, Hitler's Nazi era and the Tavistock Institute.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKp_FZNr_Ag

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

"Jung isn't satan & I never said he is. In your ignorance you fail to know Jung himself said he was heavily involved with the occult and claimed to have gotten his personality typology from his spirit demon guide named philemon. That comes from Jungs own writings. And you're blocked. If you can't discuss like a normal human being and without your extremely limited vocabulary using words like "retarded" and cussing then you are not wanted here. If you need a tool, try using a thesaurus."

LOL!

" his earlier studies of association tests and of dementia praecox were followed by an attempt to classify types of personality and by the gradual development not only of a theory of the collective unconscious but also of the implications of that theory for the study of culture and especially for the study of mythology and religion".....ummm, very interesting....goes on to define four functions of personality and when we get to intuition, Jung felt it to be "the perception of realities which are not consciously perceived; it worked spontaneously for the solution of problems which cannot be grasped rationally" ....ummm. very interesting....

oh my...it says here that Jung held "a loss of belief in gods and demons {which came with increase in scientific understanding} has produced a lack of awareness of the powers within human nature. Modern man is thus specially a prey to psychological disorders"!

So Jung thought we were better off when we believed that the thunder was the voice of gods!!
"it follows that men have a strong need for religious beliefs and experiences, since in religious form they are able to encounter and accept the contents of the collective unconscious. Religious beliefs, Jung conceded, cannot be shown to be true; but he held that they cannot be shown to be false, either. Whether to believe or not is thus a matter of choice, on purely pragmatic grounds. Jung regarded with deep suspicion, as essentially one-sided and distorting, the rationalist traditions of scientific thought. Indeed, he dated the disorientation of modern man partly from the original christard break with paganism, but more importantly from the Enlightment". Like I said, Jung fecal matter.

The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 3 & 4, McMillian Free Press, 1972 pgs. 294-296

Anthro

alkieanon's picture

Anthro says: "So Jung thought we were better off when we believed that the thunder was the voice of gods!!" LOL!

JR Harris's picture

Prof. Dr. C. G. Jung
Kusnacht-Zurich
Seestrasse 228

January 30, 1961

Mr. William G. Wilson
Alcoholics Anonymous
Box 459 Grand Central Station
New York 17, N.Y.

Dear Mr. Wilson,

Your letter has been very welcome indeed.

I had no news from Roland H. anymore and often wondered what has been his fate. Our conversation which he had adequately reported to you had an aspect of which he did not know. The reason, that I could not tell him everything, was that those days I had to be exceedingly careful of what I said. I had found out that I was misunderstood in every possible way. Thus I was very careful when I talked to Roland H. But what I really thought about, was the result of many experiences with men of his kind.

His craving for alcohol was the equivalent on a low level of the spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language: the union with God.1

How could one formulate such an insight in a language that is not misunderstood in our days?

The only right and legitimate way to such an experience is, that it happens to you in reality and it can only happen to you when you walk on a path, which leads you to a higher understanding. You might be led to that goal by an act of grace or through a personal and honest contact with friends, or through a higher education of the mind beyond the confines of mere rationalism. I see from your letter that Roland H. has chosen the second way, which was, under the circumstances, obviously the best one.

I am strongly convinced that the evil principle prevailing in this world, leads the unrecognized spiritual need into perdition, if it is not counteracted either by a real religious insight or by the protective wall of human community. An ordinary man, not protected by an action from above and isolated in society cannot resist the power of evil, which is called very aptly the Devil. But the use of such words arouse so many mistakes that one can only keep aloof from them as much as possible.

These are the reasons why I could not give a full and sufficient explanation to Roland H. but I am risking it with you because I conclude from your very decent and honest letter, that you have acquired a point of view above the misleading platitudes, one usually hears about alcoholism.

You see, Alcohol in Latin is "spiritus" and you use the same word for the highest religious experience as well as for the most depraving poison. The helpful formula therefore is: spiritus contra spiritum.

Thanking you again for your kind letter

I remain yours sincerely,

C.G. Jung

Source: http://a-1associates.com/aa/LETTERS%20ETC/Carl%20Jung%20Letter.htm

Carl Gustav Jung (26 July 1875 – 6 June 1961)

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

becket's picture

What is the point of posting this, JR Harris?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

JR Harris's picture

"Carl Jung, the cultist that made Bill Wilson, the man behind the cult of Alcoholics Anonymous proud of "ONE" letter "

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

JR Harris says: "That should be a simple answer." Trying to deny that there was a letter and a reply?

JR Harris's picture

The letter was dated January 30, 1961 and Carl Jung died June 6,1961. It was in response to a letter sent from the occultist Bill Wilson to the occultist Carl Jung on January 23, 1961. Jung was obsessed with his own cult following and it is actually good that a synergy between the two occultists did not take place, but Bill Wilson was hoping it would. The resulting synergy from the narcissistic Bill Wilson and the divisive tactics of Carl Jung in segmenting the population into a "Brave New World" LSD enhanced visionary ideas of Aldous Huxley into a master race of Bill Wilson chanters could have been very devastating.

January 23, 1961

Professor, Dr. C. G. Jung
Kusnacht-Zurich
Seestrasse 228
Switzerland

My dear Dr. Jung:

This letter of great appreciation has been very long overdue.

May I first introduce myself as Bill W., a co-founder of the Society of Alcoholics Anonymous. Though you have surely heard of us, I doubt if you are aware that a certain conversation you once had with one of your patients, a Mr. Roland H., back in the early 1930s, did play a critical role in the founding of our Fellowship.

Though Roland H. has long since passed away, the recollection of his remarkable experience while under treatment by you has definitely become part of AA history. Our remembrance of Roland H.'s statements about his experience with you is as follows:

Having exhausted other means of recovery from his alcoholism, it was about 1931 that he became your patient. I believe that he remained under your care for perhaps a year. His admiration for you was boundless, and he left you with a feeling of much confidence.

To his great consternation, he soon relapsed into intoxication. Certain that you were his "court of last resort," he again returned to your care. Then followed the conversation between you that was to become the first link in the chain of events that led to the founding of Alcoholics Anonymous.

My recollection of his account of that conversation is this: First of all, you frankly told him of his hopelessness, so far as any further medical or psychiatric treatment might be concerned. This candid and humble statement of yours was beyond a doubt the first foundation stone upon which our Society has since been built.

Coming from you, one he so trusted and admired, the impact upon him was immense.

When he asked you if there was any other hope, you told him that there might be, provided he could become the subject of a spiritual or religious experience -- in short, a genuine conversion. You pointed out how such an experience, if brought about, might remotivate him when nothing else could. But you did caution, though, that while such experiences had sometimes brought recovery to alcoholics, they were, nonetheless, comparatively rare. You recommended that he place himself in a religious atmosphere and hope for the best. This I believe was the substance of your advice.

Shortly thereafter, Mr. H. joined the Oxford Group, an evangelical movement then at the height of its success in Europe, and one with which you are doubtless familiar. You will remember their large emphasis upon the principles of self-survey, confession, restitution, and the giving of oneself in service to others. They strongly stressed meditation and prayer. In these surroundings, Roland H. did find a conversion experience that released him for the time being from his compulsion to drink.

Returning to New York, he became very active with the "O.G." here, then led by an Episcopal clergyman, Dr. Samuel Shoemaker. Dr. Shoemaker had been one of the founders of that movement, and his was a powerful personality that carried immense sincerity and conviction.

At this time (1932-34), the Oxford Group had already sobered a number of alcoholics, and Roland, feeling that he could especially identify with these sufferers, addressed himself to the help of still others. One of these chanced to be an old schoolmate of mine, named Edwin T. [Ebby]. He had been threatened with commitment to an institution, but Mr. H. and another ex-alcoholic "O. G." member procured his parole, and helped to bring about his sobriety.

Meanwhile, I had run the course of alcoholism and was threatened with commitment myself. Fortunately, I had fallen under the care of a physician -- a Dr. William D. Silkworth -- who was wonderfully capable of understanding alcoholics. But just as you had given up on Roland, so had he given me up. It was his theory that alcoholism had two components -- an obsession that compelled the sufferer to drink against his will and interest, and some sort of metabolism difficulty which he then called an allergy. The alcoholic's compulsion guaranteed that the alcoholic's drinking would go on, and the allergy made sure that the sufferer would finally deteriorate, go insane, or die. Though I had been one of the few he had thought it possible to help, he was finally obliged to tell me of my hopelessness; I, too, would have to be locked up. To me, this was a shattering blow. Just as Roland had been made ready for his conversion experience by you, so had my wonderful friend Dr. Silkworth prepared me.

Hearing of my plight, my friend Edwin T. came to see me at my home, where I was drinking. By then, it was November 1934. I had long marked my friend Edwin for a hopeless case. Yet here he was in a very evident state of "release," which could by no means be accounted for by his mere association for a very short time with the Oxford Group. Yet this obvious state of release, as distinguished from the usual depression, was tremendously convincing. Because he was a kindred sufferer, he could unquestionably communicate with me at great depth. I knew at once I must find an experience like his, or die.

Again I returned to Dr. Silkworth's care, where I could be once more sobered and so gain a clearer view of my friend's experience of release, and of Roland H.'s approach to him.

Clear once more of alcohol, I found myself terribly depressed. This seemed to be caused by my inability to gain the slightest faith. Edwin T. again visited me and repeated the simple Oxford Group formulas. Soon after he left me, I became even more depressed. In utter despair, I cried out, "If there be a God, will he show himself." There immediately came to me an illumination of enormous impact and dimension, something which I have since tried to describe in the book Alcoholics Anonymous and also in AA Comes of Age, basic texts which I am sending to you.

My release from the alcohol obsession was immediate. At once, I knew I was a free man.

Shortly following my experience, my friend Edwin came to the hospital, bringing me a copy of William James's Varieties of Religious Experience. This book gave me the realization that most conversion experiences, whatever their variety, do have a common denominator of ego collapse at depth. The individual faces an impossible dilemma. In my case, the dilemma had been created by my compulsive drinking, and the deep feeling of hopelessness had been vastly deepened still more by my alcoholic friend when he acquainted me with your verdict of hopelessness respecting Roland H.

In the wake of my spiritual experience, there came a vision of a society of alcoholics, each identifying with and transmitting his experience to the next -- chain-style. If each sufferer were to carry the news of scientific hopelessness of alcoholism to each new prospect, he might be able to lay every newcomer wide open to a transforming spiritual experience. This concept proved to be the foundation of such success as Alcoholics Anonymous has since achieved. This has made conversion experience -- nearly every variety reported by James -- available on an almost wholesale basis. Our sustained recoveries over the last quarter-century number about 300,000. In America and through the world, there are today 8,000 AA groups.

So to you, to Dr. Shoemaker of the Oxford Group, to William James, and to my own physician, Dr. Silkworth, we of AA owe this tremendous benefaction. As you will now clearly see, this astonishing chain of events actually started long ago in your consulting room, and it was directly founded upon your own humility and deep perception.

Very many thoughtful AAs are students of your writings. Because of your conviction that man is something more than intellect, emotion, and two dollars' worth of chemicals, you have especially endeared yourself to us.

How our Society grew, developed its Traditions for unity, and structured its functioning, will be seen in the texts and pamphlet material that I am sending you.

You will also be interested to learn that, in addition to the "spiritual experience," many AAs report a great variety of psychic phenomena, the cumulative weight of which is very considerable. Other members have -- following their recovery in AA -- been much helped by your practitioners. A few have been intrigued by the I Ching and your remarkable introduction to that work.

Please be certain that your place in the affection, and in the history, of our Fellowship is like no other.

Gratefully yours,

William G. W--.

January 30, 1961
Kusnacht-Zurich
Seestrasse 228

Mr. William G. W--.
Alcoholics Anonymous
Box 459 Grand Central Station
New York 17, New York

Source: http://aatradition.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/bill-wilson-carl-jung-letters....

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

JR Harris says: "Actually this documents the ONE letter that Bill was proud of" Trying to speculate on the importance of a single letter and reply?

JR Harris's picture

This isn't an AA meeting that happens one day at a time. The letters and their significance are very doubtful, but the AA faithful are trying to make something out of it for some reason and even have the letter framed at the Stepping Stones compound of the occultist Bill Wilson. Now try to add something substantial to the conversation will you.

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

alkieanon's picture

So Bill Wilson and Carl Jung were pen pals. Personal correspondence. And you're not part of the conversation.

alkieanon's picture

Sounds like "minimization". LOL!

Orange's picture

Actually, I think that the OP meant it in a different sense. I recently recieved a letter that claimed that Bill Wilson and Carl Jung carried on a "correspondence". But there has only been one letter from Carl Jung ever published. Are there more? If so, why are they not published?

One letter from Carl Jung that answered Bill Wilson's congratulatory note does not mean that Carl Jung acted as a mentor and guru for Bill Wilson, and helped to formulate the "philosophy" of Alcoholics Anonymous. Bill Wilson was just engaging in name-dropping when he wrote in the foreword to the Big Book that William James and Carl Jung were the philosophical inspiriations for A.A.

http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-letters286.html#Jung

becket's picture

Well, really, if it's the only letter he received from Jung, and he was proud of it, then it was the one letter from Jung he was proud of, not the one letter he was proud of. It's a small detail, but one which illustrates the dishonesty that continually comes from JR Harris.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Orange's picture

If I were an A.A. evangelist, I would try hard to forget that Bill Wilson ever mentioned Carl Jung. Jung was notorious for his racist and Nazi sympathies. We've been over this before, so I won't just retype it all again:

http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-letters2.html#Carl_Jung