I hope it is safe to assume that these shortcomings are the famous 'character defects' so often referred to in stepper meetings?
The big question for me is 'does God remove these shortcomings if humbly asked?’ And if he does, then why is there a need to do Step 10. Why is there a need for continued personal inventory, if God has already removed our shortcomings in Step 7?
This raises a number of questions:-
1) Does step 7 actually work?
2) Does God only remove our shortcomings temporarily and if so for how long.....do they return at midnight like Cinderella at the Ball (come to think of it steppism is a fairy story) or can you have them removed for longer periods and if so, what’s the maximum time God will remove a shortcoming for?
3) Or do steppers constantly develop new shortcomings as a result of doing the 12 steps and going to meetings, and have to constantly take inventory and admit they are wrong? Steppism is therefore ANTIspiritual (not religious) and actually creates shortcomings and therefore spiritual diseases
4) Or do steppers hang on to shortcomings and it is these that have to acknowledged in Step 10 Or perhaps a combination of hung onto shortcomings and new shortcomings?
5) Can you partially hang on to a shortcoming so you only have half a shortcoming to acknowledge and admit you are wrong in step 10?
6) Can/will God remove a shortcoming that you are hanging on to?
7) Why do steppers humbly ask God to REMOVE their shortcomings in step 7 but only PROMTLY ADMIT THEY ARE WRONG when they find new or hung onto shortcomings in step 10?
8) Is Step 10 really a way to keep hung onto shortcomings, by just promptly admitting you are wrong, but not humbly asking God to remove them and therefore does Step 10 actually jeopardise a steppers sobriety?
9) Why not skip step 6 and go directly to step 7, a bit like playing snakes and ladders?
Can any of our resident stepper Gurus enlighten me as I want to understand the 'message'
Comments
alkieanon
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 20:39
Permalink
Criminal Element
Trisha K.
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 21:12
Permalink
Being raped is never a choice.
So what part in it did I have. Let me see, being traumatized, living in fear, looking over my shoulder, studdering when the person enters the room, nightmares, anxiety issues, crying uncontrollably, relationship issues and I could go on. Last but not least spending the last few decades of my life, trying to put back those special pieces of my life that were torn from me at such an early age.
This is the part I had in the aftermath. My inventory taught me this. I too had a beautiful sponsor, she was special.
“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine
live_free_or_die
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 20:44
Permalink
Remember your outrage
the next time you hear an AA'er say "What was your part?"
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
Clara
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 20:48
Permalink
Again, I don't think it is
Again, I don't think it is THAT you have a part in anything, but if...
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
live_free_or_die
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 21:00
Permalink
Well CLar
Let's look at an actual incident.
A male AA sponsor in Colorado went to a hotel to meet with a female sponsee. The male sponsor sexually assualted the woman. The woman was there to do step 4 with the male sponsor and he assaulted her.
This story was posted here on the OPF and none of the AA apologists here had any comments in the way of sympathy for the victim. None.
The story was posted on the news affiliate that carried the story and most of the comments on the news story were trying to blame the victim, the sponsee that was assaulted.
How about we blame the scumbag male sponsor?
Where was the outrage from the AA'ers?
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
becket
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 21:16
Permalink
Who has time to read these
Who has time to read these ridiculous stories when they are padded on either side by crap about McDonald's and Walmart? I don't read the shit. It's just a flood of unnecessary third-party shit. If someone wants to argue a point, let him do it in his own words. Cutting/pasting has its place, but when it supersedes all other posts and demands attention as you are insisting that it must, it becomes a total fuckin snooze.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Clara
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 21:36
Permalink
First of all, why is she
First of all, why is she going to a hotel for any reason? My mama told me the dangers of that. Why is HE taking advantage of that relationship? I see alot of wrong everywhere in this.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
live_free_or_die
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:06
Permalink
So you are blaming the victim here right CLar?
CLar said "Why is HE taking advantage of that relationship?
CLar, you are saying that the woman had a part in this sexual assault right? You are putting some blame on the woman right?
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
Clara
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:12
Permalink
I think that both were dumb
I think that both were dumb as dirt, and I don't have to be an AA to see where there is wrong on both sides.
As unpopular as this is going to sound, I can't think of a reason for a sponsor to be meeting a sponsee, let alone an oppostie sex one, at a hotel. I can't see a situation where I would agree to meet mine at a hotel, LFOD.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
dolson
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:14
Permalink
The answer is yes.
The answer is yes.
Go ahead, enjoy yourselves - it's getting late, much later than you think.
Clara
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:15
Permalink
State it correctly, Dolson.
State it correctly, Dolson. They were both wrong.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
dolson
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:17
Permalink
The answer is still yes.
The answer is still yes.
Go ahead, enjoy yourselves - it's getting late, much later than you think.
live_free_or_die
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:24
Permalink
CLar
I don't disagree that the woman should not have been there. Not very smart on her part but she should not have been assaulted.
However, neither you nor I know what kind of condition she was in mentally or emotionally. Sponsors are supposed to help their sponcees, correct?
The bottom line is the sponsor should not have taken advantage of her. Period.
The sponosr was the perpetrator, not the woman.
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
Clara
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:29
Permalink
I agree with you. I realize
I agree with you. I realize that he's the perp and she is a victim, but no one was right in this instance.
You asked me what I thought and I have told you my honest feelings. That doesn't mean I would say that to her, though. She's got enough on her plate.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
dolson
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:40
Permalink
Total bullshit.
Total bullshit.
Go ahead, enjoy yourselves - it's getting late, much later than you think.
Clara
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:49
Permalink
Dolson, he asked a question
Dolson, he asked a question and I gave my answer. I would meet someone in the coffee shop of a hotel, but I can't think of a legitimate reason where I would go to someone's room. My sponsor has his own home. Why would he call me to meet him at a hotel? Sorry...
No one is suggesting that she "deserved" this, but it smelled from the word go.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
Trisha K.
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 14:20
Permalink
You really are gullible.
Did she attest to this gentlemen being her sponsor in this article or has the journalist taken liberty here to call him one to pump up the hype in this story. Second why would a male and a female meet in a hotel room alone, there are so many other public locations. This whole story smells of bullshit, IMO, I think the journalist is looking for a story, is aware of the negative hype on the internet and is trying to sell papers.
There is no way a woman is going to meet a guy in a hotel room to do a 4th step. Shame on this journalist.
“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine
alkieanon
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:55
Permalink
Watch the video and read the article again
live_free_or_die says: "Let's look at an actual incident." Please do. Watch the video and read the article again. Your spin on the story doesn't match.
live_free_or_die says: "This story was posted here on the OPF and none of the AA apologists here had any comments in the way of sympathy for the victim. None." Funny. Looking at my comment right now.
live_free_or_die says: "... most of the comments on the news story were trying to blame the victim ...." More like "What the F___ were they thinking?"
live_free_or_die
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 00:04
Permalink
whatever alkie
AA Sponsor arrested
Primary tabsView(active tab) Edit Track
published by live_free_or_die on Sun, 03/04/2012 - 13:29
BOULDER — Police arrested a man this week who is suspected of using his position within Alcoholics Anonymous to inappropriately touch a woman during a meeting at a Boulder hotel.
Laureano Sifuentes, 64, had been under investigation by Boulder police since November, and he was arrested on Wednesday by Longmont police on a Boulder warrant.
According to police, Sifuentes is associated with a local Alcoholics Anonymous group, and he persuaded at least two women that he would help them through one of AA's 12 steps, which requires disclosure of information in a private, one-on-one meeting.
Police said Sifuentes arranged a private meeting at a hotel with the victim and another woman. The victim told police that during the meeting, Sifuentes touched her sexually. She fled from the room and called a friend to pick her up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ur_3R1HOGg
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/30431327/detail.html
***********************************************************
The above story was posted on the OP Forums on 2/12/12 in the AA Horror Stories Forum Thread.
Conspicuously absent from the comments on this post on 2/12/12 were any remarks from the then current AA ThinkSpeak™ trolls MArrrietta Davis ( now Clara), Danny B II (now TRisha K/Becket) or billybuddy (still billybuddy).
I wonder why?
***********************************************************
live_free_or_die's blog
Comments
btnben
Sun, 03/04/2012 - 13:41
Permalink
Like what you said lfod
But I must disagree on you with the linking of Marietta and Clara. Marietta, bless her, had her faults, but I honestly believe she would remove her own pancreas without anesthetic rather that spout the trite bullshit "Last Word" Clara comes out with.
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
reply
JR Harris
Sun, 03/04/2012 - 13:41
Permalink
The Stepper troll collective of Danny and Marietta
aren't commenting on the current Bob Ryder story either. The Danny and Marietta Show, dragging to new lows and promoting opposite sex Sponsorship through their actions and "shares."
reply
avogadno
Sun, 03/04/2012 - 14:50
Permalink
Trolls picking their spots.
Actually, there is nothing wrong with choosing your arguments but it does show that the trolls cannot give a logical argument toward most of anti AA claims. The AA lies is an example. How many time should we list them JR?. They can't refute it so they nit pick on our personal character if that somehow gives proof to their stance. Control and abuse is rampant in AA and is another fact that they can't refute. There stance is their observation that it doesn't happen in their meetings. OK, I can buy that there are meetings that haven't been over run by fanatical Guru's. But it is also a big possibility that that they haven't seen it occur in their groups. Does that mean it isn't there? Most of time people try to hide these crimes so it doesn't surprise me that they don't see it happening in every meeting they go to. But to claim it doesn't happen just because they don't see it is convenient and fancy. I didn't witness the Hitler massacre but it happened. I didn't witness the Columbine shootings but that indeed happened to. Alcoholics Anonymous member Bob Ryder of Maine committed murder and had help covering it up by is AA sponsor. That incidence must be the imagination of Maine residents because I didn't see it happen..NOT....The list is long and only those in a state of denial about their beloved AA can ignore the obvious and extreme flaws in the program.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” ~ Aldous Huxley
reply
btnben
Sun, 03/04/2012 - 15:18
Permalink
Trolls picking their spots...lol
"Clara, stop it. It will never heal if you keep picking it"
"Danny - if you don't stop doing that, you'll go blind!!!!"
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
reply
btnben
Sun, 03/04/2012 - 15:16
Permalink
Never would have happened in Bill W's day
Getting arrested for sexually abusing sponcees? What is the world coming to?
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
reply
alkieanon
Sun, 03/04/2012 - 18:06
Permalink
3-way
Earlier news reports seemed to gloss over the fact that there were more people present (besides the accuser and the accused). This news report is more explicit:
"Police said Sifuentes arranged a private meeting at a hotel with the victim and another woman."
Wonder if he was trying to re-create an SNL short:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi7gwX7rjOw
reply
live_free_or_die
Tue, 03/06/2012 - 07:02
Permalink
Standard AA response II
This post has been up for several days and there has been no comment from any of our current AA trolls, otherwise known as 12 Steppers or what I call AA ThinkSpeakers.™
This is what you can expect from AA. No response, no comment. There will be no admission that there is a problem with crimes being committed by AA members in and around the roomz of AA across the US and abroad.
SILENCE.
The AA’er will say “just the facts” ma’am.
Well, here is irrefutable proof of crimes in AA.
Some will say, well, yeah, ok. But, there is more crime at McDonalds. More murders while getting your Big Mac fix. Are you kidding me? How simplistic is that thinkin? How many rapists and violent criminals are sentenced to 90 ¼ pounders in 90 days? Jezus.
Where is ClaraMArrrietta on this one? Where is DannyBisha K on this one? Where is NB becket?
Yep. SILENCE.
"Once, during Prohibition, I was forced to live for days on nothing but food and water". W.C. Fields
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS, SMART, WFS (Women For Sobriety)
>> http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/Ontrack/?page_id=91
edit reply
Add new comment
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
becket
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 13:25
Permalink
What's the purpose of this
What's the purpose of this multiple posting? Are you soliciting opinions which you will then shit on and discard, or are you pointing out that several regular posters have NOT offered an opinion on these items so that you could shit on them and discard them?
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
becket
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 21:14
Permalink
No one who has any
No one who has any significant understanding of how the steps work would ever suggest to another person that s/he played a part in a rape. That is obnoxious and inflammatory and you know it. But you do it anyway. What do you hope to win by your gaming this topic? You are the one who solicits outrage, live_free. Live free my ass. There's no freedom in your thinking or your interchanges with anyone else. It's all just a big wheel of fortune to you, a big roulette table with no one to control your bad behaviors. Boring and pathetic.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
live_free_or_die
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 21:53
Permalink
Blame the victim
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcGtSzd9Tzo
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
alkieanon
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 22:01
Permalink
Repeat, Rerun, Retread, Recycle, Regurgitate
http://www.orange-papers.org/forum/comment/13059#comment-13059
http://www.orange-papers.org/forum/comment/21357#comment-21357
becket
Fri, 06/08/2012 - 23:33
Permalink
I blame the perp.
I blame the perp. In this case, it is you, the inept and inarticulate gadfly, live_kindoffreebutnotreally.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
live_free_or_die
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 00:13
Permalink
The blame game
I am the perp because I raised an issue that is way to common among AA'ers, namely blame the victim?
There are serious harmful issues within AA that need to be exposed. Alcoholics Anonymous ain't so anonymous anymore.
Alcoholics Anonymous: MyNotGodHasItCovered®
http://www.expaa.org/
http://bereanresearch.com/
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
NOT AA:
Rational Recovery, SOS, HAMS
http://alcoholabusesolutions.com/
becket
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 13:27
Permalink
You live in the game, dude:
You live in the game, dude: the set-up, the entrapment, the snare. It is not discourse, it is not discussion or debate. It's a recreation. It's sport. It's a drag.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Clara
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 15:20
Permalink
I am not blaming the victim,
I am not blaming the victim, but I think it was a three way gone bad. Think about it. We've got one guy and two woman. What is the role of the second woman?
There is alot about this that makes no sense. I never met a man at a hotel for reasons having to do with a fourht step. I wouldn't need to go to a hotel to do a fourth step, and I wouldn't have others around for said fourth step.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
causeandeffect
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 16:09
Permalink
Well, that's the problem. You
Well, that's the problem. You never know what a sick, vulnerable person is going to get tricked into. They are told that this is a "spiritual" program and the people in it are spiritual people. They are told they must trust the other members of AA. They are told they can't trust their own minds or their instincts, and indeed, if they've been drinking long enough and hard enough, their heads are temporarily full of squash rot. They are told the old timers hold the key to their sobriety, and their very lives. They are told to give out their numbers to perfect strangers. They are told they MUST be willing to go to any length or they will drink and die. They are told to trust the process, and are dependent on others to tell them just what the process entails.
And when they do all of that, do what they have been told, and it all goes horribly wrong, they are the ones blamed for it and the perpetrator gets a pass. Just plain sad.
Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson
avogadno
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 00:52
Permalink
They do blame people for
They do blame people for their part in rape though. Other victimizations too. Apparently not all, which I didn't believe before, but a lot do. Steppism gets out of control Becket. Why would so many of us just make this up?? Its' an awful occurrence.
Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/
Trisha K.
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 14:39
Permalink
avogadno wrote:
avogadno wrote:
"Why would so many of us just make this up??"
First, you do not have many there are but a few anti's such as yourself. Second, is it me or is there a group conscious amongst the anti aa members here to play up the victim card.
Third, I have read many a comment here concerning very serious sexual abuses and to read how flippantly most of you women toss around how members of AA deal with these horrific crimes against women and it just sickens me.
I don't know who you gals hung around with or where you went to meeting but nobody, "I mean nobody" ever told another women in any group i was ever associated with that her rape was her fault,"that she had a part in it". I would of jumped up and knocked the shit out of someone if I had ever heard anything remotely close to this stupid statement. WTF!!!
There is no way you are serious Avogadno, no way. I mean come on, it is one thing to make a point but to go to any length....IDK!
We are discussing AA, Bills book was about alcoholics. How the heck did we get here, what does sexual assault have to do with the BB or the Orange Papers.
“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine
avogadno
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 14:55
Permalink
Read the previous posts
Read the previous posts thoroughly and you might be able to figure it out for yourself.
I'm not going out of my way to convince you of anything. I really don't care what you think or feel.
Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/
Clara
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 15:18
Permalink
I've never seen any of it,
I've never seen any of it, either, and we have had our share of sex abuse victims.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
SandyB
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 15:46
Permalink
It has to do with Orange Papers because..
you, a rapist, are a member. Sit your ass down and shut up.
Danny, you would get up and hug the shit out of them you pedophile
It scares the shit out of me that you're out there somewhere (Oklahoma City) sponsoring someone. You probably attract the worst of the worst with your personality. You tell them the wife they beat, the kid they raped, was their disease.
Tell us about the Third Nail Danny
SandyB
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 15:56
Permalink
Tell us Danny
how do you forgive yourself for sexually assaulting your own sister?
Do you buy into the "I was drinking then" bullshit?
We all drank Danny. We didn't rape and abuse people. AA gives people like you an easy out for the shit you diid. That's why convicts love it. "That is old behavior" or "I'm an entirely different person when I drink" but you keep relapsing over the ones you raped whan you were sober. There's no excuse for that. Only a good relapse gets that shit out of your head
Then you come here attacking people for petty bullshit that doesn't support your excuses
Bill W. wouldn't wipe his ass with you, and he was a piece of shit
SandyB
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 15:56
Permalink
Tell us Danny
how do you forgive yourself for sexually assaulting your own sister?
Do you buy into the "I was drinking then" bullshit?
We all drank Danny. We didn't rape and abuse people. AA gives people like you an easy out for the shit you diid. That's why convicts love it. "That is old behavior" or "I'm an entirely different person when I drink" but you keep relapsing over the ones you raped whan you were sober. There's no excuse for that. Only a good relapse gets that shit out of your head
Then you come here attacking people for petty bullshit that doesn't support your excuses
Bill W. wouldn't wipe his ass with you, and he was a piece of shit
Persephone In Exile
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 16:01
Permalink
I've seen this on more than
I've seen this on more than one occasion. I've seen it go the other direction as well, with plenty of understanding and empathy shown to the victims. Still, the few times I've seen the blame and shame game were enough.
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
avogadno
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 17:14
Permalink
Many in the 12 step rooms don
Many in the 12 step rooms don't realize how difficult it is for a victim of trauma to give up their power. Admitting powerlessness to anything, especially an addiction which I think is bullshit, is the last thing that they want to do.
Imagine a victim of rape that was physically forced into a sexual act by another person. She (or he) had her power TAKEN from her and that is an awful feeling. Expecting her to give up her power over addiction and turn it over to some other entity is absurd. Giving up their control in other situations is likely the last thing that they want to do. Especially since it requires giving someone else that control over them again.
Having it be a requirement to join a self help group is self destructive and demoralizing. It's a hoax that keeps people from accomplishing what only they can do for themselves. The AA movement teaches people that they are helpless when in actuality they are the ONLY ONES that are able to get and keep themselves clean and sober.
Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/
Clara
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 16:51
Permalink
Haven't you already given up
Haven't you already given up your power over to your addiction?
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
JR Harris
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 17:04
Permalink
I believe it is giving up on the cult of Alcoholics Anonymous
Many cults have had their hey day.
1. The People’s Temple
2. Branch Davidians
3. The Solar Temple
4. Heaven’s Gate
5. The Manson Family
6. The Ku Klux Klan (or KKK)
7. Children of God
8. The Unification Church
9. Hare Krishna
10. Scientology
The cult of Alcoholics Anonymous will be added to this list soon, by making people aware of the coven of Bill Wilson chanters infiltrating the Religious community at the Interchurch Center in New York. It is only a matter of time.
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-cults.php
"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.
avogadno
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 17:24
Permalink
No I have not.
No I have not.
This was in response to Clara that asked: "Haven't you already given up your power over to your addiction?"
Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/
causeandeffect
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 17:53
Permalink
Me either. If I had, I would
Me either. If I had, I would never have been able to get and stay sober.
Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson
gigi
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 18:17
Permalink
Power
I don't think that the question (ie giving up power to your addiction) is always so cut and dry. When I was in the worst part of my drinking-daily, all day maintenance drinking-I had given up my power. I was defeated. In order to get and stay sober, I had to admit that defeat and take back my power. That's different that admitting powerlessness, though. The first 'step' that I had to take was to admit that although I HAD willingly given my power away and ceased taking responsibility for my actions. Basically, admitting that I had fucked up and now it was time to own up. Then, I was able to take my power back and do something about it. I had to admit to myself that I was powerful and capable. Taking personal responsibility is the only way that makes sense to me.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 18:24
Permalink
It is impossible to give up
It is impossible to give up one's power over whether to voluntarily consume alcohol. You couldn't do it even if you wanted to.
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
becket
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 18:36
Permalink
I'm identifying mostly with
I'm identifying mostly with gigi's experience here. There are degrees of surrendering and of developing willingness and ability to resume living and being responsible for oneself. There was no trade-off. I did feel powerless over my ability to control my drinking, and that other people may think that was not the case, that people are never powerless in the face of addiction or dependence, makes no difference to me. That is the way I was experiencing it. I never felt that I ever lost anything - it was just that enough was enough. Frankly, I thought it was a relief to temporarily rest in the non-responsibility (not irresponsibility) for a little bit so I could assess and regroup.
The decision to go to AA was mine. The decision to pull from it anything useful was mine. The decision to attend meetings for ten years was mine. The decision to move on was mine. Does that sound like a powerless person?
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pennywise
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 18:41
Permalink
I think people have different
I think people have different mental strategies and paradigms for viewing the world. I'm not saying one conception is superior to another. Nevertheless, when the rubber really hits the road, I don't think anyone is truly powerless over the choice to voluntarily consume liquor.
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
becket
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 18:54
Permalink
I feel the truth is in
I feel the truth is in perception, not in some great Objective, External Reality or Truth. We are sentient beings. We experience, we feel, we must cope. Once partying turned into maintenance drinking, and that was very early in the game, ably assisted by street and prescription drug use, I felt that I could not control it. Without ever really understanding the obsession and compulsion paradigm, I was locked inside it. It's not something someone suggested to me and I wore like a cheap suit. I felt that I could not get out, I could not quit. I was smart, I was savvy, I was insouciant and worldly. And I could not get out. That was my perception. That was what I had to work with. That was what I had to base my decisions on. That is how I came to AA.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
gigi
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 19:08
Permalink
Of course noone is ever truly
Of course noone is ever truly powerless over the choice to vouluntarily consume liquor. But I agree with Becket's post above that some may feel that way. Perception is reality. If I believe that I am powerless; I am. The key is finding the presence of mind and strength needed to change that perception.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
Pennywise
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 19:14
Permalink
Perception is reality. If I
Perception is reality. If I believe that I am powerless; I am. The key is finding the presence of mind and strength needed to change that perception.
Perhaps the key to finding the presence of mind and strength needed to change that perception is to realize that it is only a perception and NOT reality? Just a thought...
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 19:18
Permalink
Oh, absolutely!
Oh, absolutely!
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
becket
Sat, 06/09/2012 - 19:22
Permalink
I am in the process of
I am in the process of helping a loved one to guide his brother through detox and treatment. This will be his fourth or fifth treatment visit. This person is bright, charming and cunning. I would love to see either Pennywise or gigi try to convince this man that he has the power to quit, that his dependence is not a reality. How would you go about it? What could you say to him? Keep in mind if he clocks his wife again he's going to the Big House (three strikes). What can you tell this kind of man?
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Pages