I thought I'd start this blog as we were starting to overrun JR's Scotland minimum price blog - sorry about that JR.
This seems a good place to gather information. I hope all you US based peeps will bear with us folks over here, SMART is a real danger to AA because it is based on recognised scientific methods. Certain AAs in certain areas are very quick to catch onto anything that may threaten their little worlds. I think it would be a good idea to see if we can identify a) if there is a problem and b) how big the problem is.
The only SMART meeting I've had any contact with was in Torquay in Devon. It seemed to be pretty well established and was run by the local Drug and Alcohol Advice Service. I met with the facilitator after the meeting and she was ex-AA and fairly anti. The general feel of the meeting was "I've tried AA and it didn't work".
If anyone has any information about any other SMART UK meetings it would be useful to know. Anyone wanting to leave AA doesn't want to get out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Comments
NoAAUK
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 14:01
Permalink
Yes sorry about that JR. Ive
Yes sorry about that JR. Ive been longing to get this question debated since I joined this forum I think I have brought it up in the wrong place.
When I was involved with trying to get MM started in the UK and a couple of SMART meetings as well I was told you can't 'bash' AA and promote MM at the same time. I don't understand why, I don't see any common ground between AA and MM and very little between AA and SMART other that they both purport to practice total abstinence. I would further say you may have to bash AA if you are to regain any level of controlled drinking. Anyway there is definitley censorship about AA critisism in both organisations. What we called exposing the truth they call 'ranting' or 'bashing'
Ive related what happened at Turning Point Westminster with both the SMART meeting I started which was taken over and now is run by a stepper and the MM meeting which had to be abandoned. I really have to watch what I say, confidences can be breached I could possibly set my self up for a lawsuit, but I have very strong reasons to believe SMART UK is being infiltrated by steppers.
Tom Horvarth SMART President stops critisim of AA on the SMART training video. I can't re watch it now, I'm no longer a member, so I really have to be totally sure of my facts as much as I can recal. A woman comes to a SMART meeting doing the stepper routine...Hi I'm whatever and I'm an Alcoholic and proceeds with some stepper talk. Another member who's obviously a bit under the influence of booze says 12 step is bollocks or words to that effect. Tom Horvarth corrects him saying something along the lines of SMART dosen't critisise other groups and theres plenty of evidence to say AA works for lots of people (he dosen't say what evidence). The idea is that SMART does not critisise AA, saying bollocks or whatever was not the reason for the correction nor is rudness the point being considered. I was personally disgusted. We all know exposure of the lies misinformation and scaremongering indoctrination of stepism, if only the powerlessness concept, is necessary for habit change, I don't like the word recovery, I'm not recovering from anything I'm just trying to change a bad habit either by moderation or total abstinence, it dosen't matter, its still habit change.
Anyway the point is Tom Horvarth is not concerned with the damage stepper indoctination may have done to members of the group, only not upsetting the stepper. He's effectiley giving steppers the green light to infiltrate SMART. I and others really don't want to be around Steppers or listen to their talk, I thought that was the idea of non 12 step alternatives. For christs sake there are enough stepper meetings do we have to hear it at the few SMART meetings.
What I would say about SMART UK meetings is check the London meetings at Turning Point and Bromley. The person who started and did run the Bromley meeting was or possibly still is an active stepper, he talks stepper. If anybody in the London area does check out these meetings I'd be interested to hear are these actualy being run as stepper meetings or how much stepper talk or is any stepper rectuitment going on at these meetings.
An enqiry regarding MM I had from Devon was the original founder of the SMART meeting in Paignton I'm pretty certain. Although at the time not an active stepper he was a former stepper and an advocate of 12 step and a member of some christian church that raises alarm bells with me. The 2nd person to try to start SMART in Nottingham was a member of Self Help Nottingham and a promoter of 12 step.
I may be over reacting except for Turning Point Westmister, but all these SMART facilitators have connections to AA and are not anti AA or or promoters of AA. I know only one other former SMART facilitor, the first involved in SMART Nottingham, he was not pro AA
I personally think SMART UK will be a mogrel, some anti AA, some pro AA sexual predators and control freaks possilbly flitting between both as AA declines. I'm not impressed by SMART UK
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
massive
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 01:05
Permalink
I like Tom Horvath alot. I
I like Tom Horvath alot. I guess I need to see this interview. I do get it though. I think they are letting too much slide. They need to stop those AA steppers and straighten their asses out when they start talking AA speak.
I never got the impression he likes AA at all. Maybe he wants to get along with the 99%...seeing they are occupying 95% of the rehabs and what not!
Massive
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 11:48
Permalink
It’s the last section of the
It’s the last section of the SMART facilitator course, the one dealing with difficult issues. Horvath even said that there was plenty of evidence that AA works for lots of people. He can do more for the promotion and validation of AA in that single video, than a thousand stepper gurus spouting cult speech for months, possibly years. It more or less finished me with SMART, I didn't bother with the last test, so technically didn't complete the course.
On one hand SMART are saying you are not powerless, haven't got a disease and don't have to go to meetings for life, you can graduate and move on. Then people who have been systematically indoctrinated with these very cult ideas, possibly for years, are then told they can't complain about the people who brainwashed them. Contradictory behaviour? What about those attending SMART meetings who really want out of the stepper cults, but are afraid to leave because of death insanity or gaols? Possibly most of the people in the meeting
I don't know much about Horvath’s background, I don't particularly want to after that video, and I don't expect anyone to hate AA if they have never been . What I object to is blatant censorship of criticism of wonderful AA and from the very top of its largest alternative at that. And the same censorship is now preached by members of MM (Horvath is on their board of directors...coincidence?) Didn’t all this happen with paedophile catholic priests. Censorship of anyone who complains.
I appreciate he may well want to get along with the 99%...seeing they are occupying 95% of the rehabs and what not and it may not even be his idea at the end of the day, all the SMART board members may be for this censorship (Stanton Peele is no longer on the board of MM?), hes just the one I've seen officially preaching it
You say “I think they are letting too much slide. They need to stop those AA steppers and straighten their asses out when they start talking AA speak.” EXACTLY!!!
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
massive
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 23:54
Permalink
noAAUK- As you can see, I
noAAUK- As you can see, I think there is room and maybe a need for even something else. Another support group that would actually allow AA bashing for those needing to vent, for those who have been harmed, for those who want to deprogram, and even for those who want to try MM and not be dry for our entire lives.
I do not believe that I have a disease and after 37 f###king years sober....personally I am not impressed with time and Im sick of it and all that it represents. I think its BS.
I agree with you.
Massive
NoAAUK
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 04:32
Permalink
Hi Massive
Hi Massive
I personally think that network has already begun. When I first read of MM in a book I thought that was the answer with an excellent book Responsible Drinking and a catchy name and logo really marketable……..yes I believe the network has already begun with just 2 face to face meetings and an online listserv, it’s the HAMS Network.
I now believe this is the real sleeping giant. They already cater for all you say. I no longer believe in MM or SMART.
A UK professional I have spoken to thinks it would be best to start with moderation, get that established first, then move on to the wider concept of Harm Reduction. But I think we have waited long enough, people are are getting abused mentally and physically and are dying, we have wasted enough time already
The only problem I anticipate with HAMS over here is the abstinence part. I believe to form a real and succesful large scale Moderation/Harm reduction Network in the UK you’ve got to go completely round the Treatment Centres. The best way I see to do this, is to advertise at point of Sale, ie Drinking establishments and Supermarkets. Hey Presto no need for censorship, 'bash' stepism as much as you like, and also get genuine help and sincere peer support. Everybody who drinks knows you exist and that there is an alternative to AA and total abstinence generally. But you can’t expect the drinks industry to promote a group that is concerned with total abstinence. Also GP’s can be approached.
You need a working relationship with a Non 12 Step Total Abstinence Network that dosen’t practice censorship of ‘AA bashing’ so those who really cannot attain any safe degree of Moderation /Harm Reduction, can be sign posted to it as well, but I’m not sure of combining all three options Harm Reduction, Abstinence and Moderation in one Network is good from the aspect of large scale promotion. However if the abstinence element is secondary to the main purpose of Moderation/Harm Reduction maybe the Drinks industry would be happy with this. I am only considering large scale promotion I fully support total abstinence for people who want it or need it
I believe HAMS is the best option and actuallys deal with AA deprograming in their Tool box:-
http://hamsnetwork.org/toolbox/#a7-4
Could do with the OP on there.
My dream would be the development of a HAMS UK and Ireland or similar, on a grand scale which would then spread across to France and mainland Europe, when they saw it working with the 'drunken Brits'
It could be like a 2nd D Day, eventually chasing the Steppers out of Mainland Europe
Who Dares Wins....Say NO to 'AA 'Bashing' Censorship...Stop Stepper infiltration of Non 12 Step support groups......you know it makes sense!
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
btnben
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 14:09
Permalink
Interesting
I know I had some misgivings about SMART but couldn't put my finger on it. I spoke to that Caroline woman (is that her name?) and they seemed very interested in linking with local agencies rather than stand alone meetings.
On a personal note, I don't think ANY method will work to stop someone drinking. If you want to, you will. The best help I've had has been from the OP, simply because the papers and the people on this forum reinforced my belief that it's up to me. That's all I need. If you live in fear, like AA induces, you are more than likely to drink again. Get rid of the fear and it's small potatoes.
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
NoAAUK
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 14:53
Permalink
SMART has some good stuff.
SMART has some good stuff. Its not SMART doctrine I don't like its the way its run.
Of course its all up to you to stop. If you don't really want to stop you wont. I don't really want to thats why I follow a plan of moderation. I fully appreciate that total abstinence is the best and only really safe way to handle a drink problem. My brother and two mates are abstaining. They have done it on their own, they don't know they are powerless :-) so they don't think about drinking any more.
Don't be put off by what I say about SMART UK, if you start your own SMART meeting you can make sure it dose't get taken over by steppers. I couldn't do nothing about it at Turning Point, I was using their free venue. Maybe I could have complained to the Turning Point Board of directors, I'm thinking about doing that now any way, and cc ing the complait to Alcohol Concern and Westminster MP, but at the time I was more concerned with the MM meeting so I backed off.
Carol Hammond will let you start a meeting but promting on your own will be hard. The treatment centres have a readily available flow of potential members thats why SMART UK are keen to develop a working relationship with them. You need to find a cheap room. There are ways of getting funding to set up from some organisations, Ive seen some in Alcohol Concerns magazine. Best thing to do would be to get your local MP involved, tell him what you want to do. But you may find forces trying to stop you, which I belive are steppers in strategic positions. My MP was really keen on MM, and was going to do allsorts to help promote it, then stopped contact abruptly. I managed to get an article on MM in the local paper with a promise of a second article which was suddenly stopped, theres other obstacles and things been stopped. AA has got tentacles in all sort of places but if you want to start a SMART meeting have a go.
The great irony is that I was co founder of Mansfield AA in 1980 and actually succeeded with them. That meeting I cofounded with John has grew into five in the town and God knows how many across North Notts and North Derbyshire. Both me and John are now attempting to Control our drinking and NOT working the steps, we havn't died, gone insane or gone to prison yet, fingers crossed:-)
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
massive
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 14:33
Permalink
I hear you. I went to a
I hear you. I went to a meeting in Santa MOnica and the leader stopped me after I ranted about what I was finding and how I left AA. Many newbies were speaking stepper talk in Smart and not being corrected , when they come from rehab which 90 % of them do now, they are all talking AA bullshit, and rhetoric.
Tom Horvath said I needed to create a trauma support group for ex steppers. I agree, but I am a little too busy to do that at the moment. SOS doesn't tolerate it. TRy SOS. CAll JIM Christopher and he will send you a packet to start an SOS support group if you like over there. He hates AA.
Alot of the member at SOS the night I went were bashing AA.
makeaasafer@gmail.com dont be put off by this email. I created it when I was still in AA. when I created www.stop13stepinaa.wordpress.com then when I left and ST went down I created www.leavinaa.com with the support of ftg.
Massive
NoAAUK
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 15:21
Permalink
So is Tom Horvath pro AA or
So is Tom Horvath pro AA or not.? As I said I was disgusted at his rushing to the defence of the stepper on the SMART facilitator training video. Yes Massive Ive seen exactly the same as you the last SMART meeting I was at which i was supposed to be facilitating was full of steppers. The stepper Pro councellor who wanted to take over the group had obviously recruited them. There was one poor guy who didn't want 12 step and he was surrounded by them spouting their stuff. Even another so SMART facilitator running the Bromley group spouted some step talk and imediatley looked around for approval, it was like he did it without realising and checked himself, but I saw it.
I don't say MM is full of stepper talk, Ive never attended a US meeting and I wouldn't allow it at the meetings I facitated here. But theres definitley an un written rule that you don't 'rant' about AA. And I know some people in the US wanted and got me out when I ironically recomended my own replacment because of my hatred of AA. I'm now drawn toward HAMS. Maybe that could be an option a HAMS SOS coalition providing not only a genuine alternative to stepism but also a moderation/harm reduction alternative for those who want it
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
massive
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 01:09
Permalink
noAAUK-I'm now drawn toward
noAAUK-I'm now drawn toward HAMS. Maybe that could be an option a HAMS SOS coalition providing not only a genuine alternative to stepism but also a moderation/harm reduction alternative for those who want it.
Me too. I think this is where we are really headed. Some hybrid. I dont really wanna see another abstinence based program. I think that some need and want that. most don't and I beleive most don't need to be abstinence the rest of their lives. That is just plain stupid.
I havent been back since but once in 3 months since then.
Massive
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 14:51
Permalink
massive, I firmly believe MM
massive, I firmly believe MM or HAMS or UK Moderation /Harm Reduction Network along similar lines could really take off in the UK. The Uk government is also calling for responsible drinking, not NO drinking. It’s a fact that the social scene in all but fundamentalist muslin nations revolve around Alcohol. Probably more so in the UK and Ireland than anywhere else. I personally never drink in the house, never really have, just pubs. Its more the life the revolves around alcohol, bars clubs parties etc that’s the attraction, not the Alcohol its self although up to a point alcohol does enhance these situations before the negatives start to kick in after ‘too’ many drinks. It’s this social life which revolves around alcohol that myself and many others are not prepared to give up. This desire to socialise and enjoy yourself just won’t go away over any length of time for many, with the inevitable return to drinking. The stepper idea of powerlessness/disease is really so ludicrous its not even worth any more debate, people just naturally want to enjoy themselves.
I don’t want to get into a debate about moderation v abstinence, though I entirely agree with what you say, most don’t need abstinence for the rest of the lives, some will however. A large Moderation/Harm Redcution Network in my opinion would likely have far far greater success rates than any total Abstinence Network and it is the future, it just a matter of time till it comes.
Due to my experience of trying to promote MM over here I know the UK Treatment Centres don’t want Harm Reduction, they are too full of professional steppers or abstainers . MM was originally supposed to be part of the Alcohol Concern Pilot Scheme and I’m glad it wasn’t. Steppers in the Treatment Centres would have high jacked it as a feeder for AA. I know a former MM member who was told he was in ‘denial’ because he attended MM b y a Professional stepper in a Treatment Centre . I believe as I said before, the way forward would be point of sale advertising in Pubs clubs Supermarkets, and direct to GP’s and Employers in fact anywhere except the Treatment Centres. Work with the Drinks industry instead, but to do that the Network would have to be totally Moderation/Harm Reduction, you cant expect the drinks industry to promote total abstinence groups.
There would be absolutely no reason to fear upsetting steppers, in the UK at least. Any censorship done out of fear of upsetting steppers for your own survival, just spells disaster in the long term. Stepism is like a cancer it just keeps spreading, it needs stopping, not nurturing or ignoring. You need to keep the hard core cult members out of the alternatives, not suck up to them and censor those who oppose them, its a recipie for disaster sooner or later.
It would be fantastic if a large scale Moderation/Harm Reduction Network could work hand in hand with a Non Twelve Step Total Abstinence Network, people swapping between the two at various stages in their recovery (I hate that word, I mean habit changing process) but you need such a Total Abstinence Network not infiltrated by steppers. They will just continue to use whatever network lets them, to recruit for the cult. Censorship of AA criticism in alternatives enables them to do it. It has to be stopped
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
massive
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 00:04
Permalink
NOAAUK- Censorship of AA
NOAAUK- Censorship of AA criticism in alternatives enables them to do it. It has to be stopped
Yup! I think you are right on here.
This is a very interesting idea. I like it. More and more as I began to visit the other options and speak to people like Hank Hayes and Amy Lee Coy who have become friends, I could see there was a need for even another type of help. I don't even want to call it a program.
So what can we call it. A Support Group? I really like the idea of having a trauma group for ex steppers like me, and really welcome people who want to Moderate and have a non religious new program for those who want to be abstinent. Tom Horvath has said to me that we really need this. But Where do we begin. I started a meet up on www.meetup.com for ex steppers, but I have not created the first "meet up"
Is there any way you could be a guest on my Safe Recovery Blog Talk Radio Show to fully discuss this idea? info@mysaferecovery.com
Massive
NoAAUK
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 04:55
Permalink
Hi Massive
Hi Massive
HAMS don’t have a program, they have elements.
Do you mean you wish to establish a separate group that specifically only deals with stepper induced trauma? A sort of Orange Papers, Face to Face meetings network? Or do you mean to incorporate AA deprogramming into a wider Alcohol/Drugs problems non 12 step peer support Network?
The former, an excellent idea, may well to harder to initially form. The latter a HAMS or similar network, in my opinion, would be easier to establish in UK. You could then go on to form a specific AA deprograming/Trauma Support Group Network, sign posting people directly from the HAMS or Similar Network.
Yes to the radio show, its pretty cheap to phone the US in the middle of our night
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 15:32
Permalink
Good for SMART. Why would
Good for SMART. Why would anyone want to go to a meeting just to hear someone else rant about a different program and their horrible time? SOS should have done that, too.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 17:08
Permalink
Maybe people who investigate
Maybe people who investigate SMART, and I say maybe, its only my personal theory......maybe people who investigate SMART, are looking for alternatives to the cult of stepism and have also been damaged by stepism to the brink of suicide. Discussion of the harm they have been inflicted to, with others who have suffered the same and mutual ridicule of the lies and misinformation they have been subjected to, may also be necessary and a part of the general healing process, before they can come to believe in and embrace a genuine recovery/habit change program, recover and then move on to a better lifestyle, not forever holding hands and chanting the same slogans in church basements.
Those who really wish to, can hold hands and chant the same slogans (and solemnly nod their heads in agreement) elsewhere
Maybe these same people who are investigating SMART also don't want hear the same cult indoctrination again from stepper infiltrators, maybe, just maybe that’s why they are investigating SMART
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 18:54
Permalink
Well, No, that wouldn't be of
Well, No, that wouldn't be of interest to me. Smart has a specific format it follows, and I think the guy was correct in stopping her and suggesting a different type of group for her. People investigating SMART are interested in finding how how to deal with their situation as it relates to booze or pills, not somebody's hard time in a fellowship.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
NoAAUK
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 02:51
Permalink
"People investigating SMART
Clara "People investigating SMART are interested in finding how to deal with their situation as it relates to booze or pills, not somebody's hard time in a fellowship."
There is a very good chance that people investigating SMART may have had the very same hard time in the cult as somebody else. There is great reption in stepism of mental agony and suicide, not only thought stopping slogans and solemn head nodding
Because of deceptive promotion of generally accepted wonderful beyond reproach AA with its lies misinformation and general scaremongering, where else is there and what better place is there to discuss the truth about stepism that in the alternaives.
Self censorship of AA 'bashing', even done with the intetion of self preservtion, is a recipie for eventual disaster. If SMART and the other alternatives are going become infested with steppers and cult talk,what was the point in coming into existenece in the first place? They are just going to promote stepism from a new angle and halt and turn about the current decline in stepism. Can't Tom Horvath PhD and the other PhD's see that?
I'm a layperson andI haven't even got a degree and its blatantly obvious to me. They are not only shooting themselves in the foot, they are putting the noose aroud their own necks and the necks of the future generations of Problem Drinkers/ substance misusers who seek help
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Calinda (not verified)
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 19:11
Permalink
NoAAUK, why are you making such outrageous comments???
"maybe they have been damaged by steppism to the point of suicide"
You have been definitely indoctrinated by Stinkin Thinkin and a few members who post here on OPF. You clearly didn't learn these crazy thoughts and opinions from Orange here. I would ask you not to include the OPF in your ill thought out reckless comments as a reference.
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 20:07
Permalink
Hi Calida
Hi Calida
I learned all about AA on the ground in the satanic cult itself. I was cofounder AA Mansfield England with John in 1980. My sponsor Eric who was a legend in AA Nottingham in the 70's commited suicide in 1982. My fellow cofounder of the Mansfield Tuesday, Group Sue, died of heart attack which I have reason to belive was induced by the lies, misinfomation and scaremongering of the satanic death cult of AA.
At my first AA meeting in Nottingham some member had just died, and just about everytime I have ever returned to AA over the last 30 years, some member has just died. Death and AA seem to have some sort of lasting bond.
I don't need any truths from Stinkin Thinkin or other members who post here. Seen and felt it all personaly I would have killed myself had I not been to scared to by my Catholic upbringing. The catholic church promised hell in the afterlife. AA out did them. AA delivers hell in this life
Though US orientated, this video says it all in a nutshell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4E1nsmj7cY
All of us that survied the death cult have a moral duty to expose the truth
xxx
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
causeandeffect
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 20:17
Permalink
Hi NoAAUK
You are currently speaking to calinda, another incarnation of danny bennison/trisha k. This is an older persona he has used here before, but not as much as his others. He reinvents himself very, very often. He has more handles than I can even remember. As everyone else pointed out, it's best just to ignore him. But make no mistake, he will never, ever go away and will spend the rest of his life launching personal attacks on those critical of AA.
Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 20:32
Permalink
Hi Cause
Hi Cause
Thanks for the warning much appreciated
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
causeandeffect
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 20:59
Permalink
NoAAUK
I definitely agree with you about the dangers of stepper infiltration, and know they do so with malicious intent. I wanted to say more on this subject, but then decided against it, as it could potentially open a Pandora's box.
Personally, I believe it's due to the malice of steppers that Horvath, Miller, et al do a tap dance around the subject. In a stepper dominated field they have their backs against the wall. I think this will all take some time before they can SAFELY consider a deprogramming aspect to the alternatives. But I'm sure they are aware of the issue. When I attended SMART online, there were some people spouting slogans, but there were also those of us who figured out who was safe and who was not. We would PM each other and bash privately. I'm sure that would be true of F2F meetings as well. I recently went to a F2F meeting and there was some mild criticism, and nobody tried to put a stop to it. I think for now, deprogramming will have to be up to us.
BTW, I love your signature.
Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson
NoAAUK
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 05:32
Permalink
Hi Cause
Hi Cause
"I definitely agree with you about the dangers of stepper infiltration, and know they do so with malicious intent. I wanted to say more on this subject, but then decided against it, as it could potentially open a Pandora's box."
I really see where you are coming from and I have generally remained silent on this subject myself, while I have been a member of MM and for the short I was a SMART UK member.
People are scarred to speak out for many reasons. But that is how the stepper problem has arisen, fearful silence on the part of the abused, 77 years of it. (Except Orange and a few others who give 'em "what for")
When your back is to the wall you eventually have to fight or die. We can't bring change with silence, how much longer do SMART and the others wait and tap dance. Its the same as stopping Drinking Smoking or drugging. There IS no best time. The longer you wait, the more they infiltrate and the stronger they get within your Network, its like a wasp larvae eating the caterpillar from within.
Stuff the silence.... As we say over here "Bring it on!"
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
dandammit
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 04:39
Permalink
NoAAUK and everyone new,
NoAAUK and everyone new,
Please do not confuse me with Danny Bennison,
I wish I had chosen a different user name!
JR Harris
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 20:32
Permalink
Hi Calinda, I forgot all about you as Danny's other persona
What made you remember that you had this login also? Your vernacular is extremely easy to spot.
http://orange-papers.org/forum/node/962
You have been busted again Danny...... the rigorous honesty multiplier of multiple logins isn't very Spiritual.
"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.
massive
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 00:10
Permalink
No AA UK- Yes Yes this is why
No AA UK- Yes Yes this is why I went. I was so curious. I liked it alot at first, but then I saw the influence from rehabs, and the Smart Meetings seemed to have many newbies, and they were speaking AA crap from the rehab and believing it and the leader was not always saying Oh BTW...you don't have a disease!
I began to feel like I didn't belong there either with 37 years sober. I didn't relate to their stuff. While in SOS they just talk about the past week. It was nice. Jim Christopher let me AA bash all I wanted. LOL
Massive
patti
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 10:56
Permalink
Because they have tolerance
Because they have tolerance and ac ceptance for everything in order to outwit the cunning of their dis
patti
patti
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 11:00
Permalink
Their disease! I phone!
Their disease! I phone!
patti
NoAAUK
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 17:15
Permalink
Go for SOS then, they sound
Go for SOS then, they sound like a genuine alternative to stepism. Last time I looked on the SMART UK website, most of the meetings were in Treatment Centres. My experience of Treatment Centre Coucellors, which was mainly trying to Promote MM and SMART, are that they are mostly, unemployable anywhere else, recovery obssesive gurus. I dont think ex substance abusers should be allowed to become Treatment Centre Councellors, talk about loss of objectivity and the Lunatics running the Asylum. As Jesus is a fraud said, Sobriety is a bout living, doing something else not just stopping drinking, or words to that effect. There was talk once of paying some SMART UK facilitators, making them sort of semi professionals. Its not traditional peer led support and the trained facilitator thing just creates a ranking system same as AA, not a group of equals like I tried to create with MM where the facilitator really just ensures the meeting takes place. The one thing I learned from AA was how NOT to run a support group and if you are doing the opposite of them, you are doing it right. I really think SMART UK will just become a sort of little side line, a little bit of REBT for steppers or as I said a sort of mongrel organisation. I believe they are only interested in numbers of meetings, who runs them or who attends doesn't really matter. Maybe it really is best to just 'go it alone' with a manual, SMART or otherwise. The whole treatment system seems totally screwed up to me. What I saw of Turning Point was mostly different service users every time I went, but to be fair it was only saturdays. Retention rate didn't look impressive
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
byeg00d
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 18:18
Permalink
I've looked into SMART and it
I've looked into SMART and it's nowhere near my area, the closest meeting (if I recall) was in Ottawa...8 hrs away. I hope it takes off and becomes more available, or others programs similar because unfortunatley AA is the dominant support group, and I'm really looking right now, but everything sounds SO similar to 12 step. I'm even kinda nervous about Women For Sobriety.
massive
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 01:10
Permalink
I hear from some that WFS is
I hear from some that WFS is kinda too much like AA and is filled with steppers. I have not been yet. I plan to but....
Massive
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 17:37
Permalink
You are here: Home » New Life
You are here: Home » New Life Program » WFS “New Life” Acceptance Program
WFS “New Life” Acceptance Program
1.I have a life-threatening problem that once had me.
I now take charge of my life and my disease. I accept the responsibility.
2.Negative thoughts destroy only myself.
My first conscious sober act must be to remove negativity from my life.
3.Happiness is a habit I will develop.
Happiness is created, not waited for.
4.Problems bother me only to the degree I permit them to.
I now better understand my problems and do not permit problems to overwhelm me.
5.I am what I think.
I am a capable, competent, caring, compassionate woman.
6.Life can be ordinary or it can be great.
Greatness is mine by a conscious effort.
7.Love can change the course of my world.
Caring becomes all important.
8.The fundamental object of life is emotional and spiritual growth.
Daily I put my life into a proper order, knowing which are the priorities.
9.The past is gone forever.
No longer will I be victimized by the past. I am a new person.
10.All love given returns.
I will learn to know that others love me.
11.Enthusiasm is my daily exercise.
I treasure all moments of my new life
12.I am a competent woman and have much to give life.
This is what I am and I shall know it always.
13.I am responsible for myself and for my actions.
I am in charge of my mind, my thoughts, and my life.
To make the Program effective for you, arise each morning fifteen minutes earlier than usual and go over the Thirteen Affirmations. Then begin to think about each one by itself. Take one Statement and use it consciously all day. At the end of the day review the use of it and what effects it had that day for you and your actions.
(c) 1976, 1987, 1993, 2011>>
It probably is fair to say that it has some steps, but IMO they all do. Call it an exercise, call it a step, call it an affirmation... your tomato is my tomAto...
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 16:17
Permalink
Hi byegood, if you travel 8
Hi byegood, if you travel 8 hours you certainly don't want repackaged stepism. More or less anyone can get stepism anywhere, probably just down the road.
Your current predicament is just one more example of how pathetic substance abuse treatment options are, even now with so called alternatives
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Trisha K.
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 18:51
Permalink
Start your own group!!
I mean this in the most honest sincere way. Don't wait,stop looking, make it happen. We may disagree with AA but Bill and Bob didn't wait around for to long before they became pro active.
Create your own recovery support system. You will be a stronger person for it and you will also be helping others.
“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine
AntiDenial
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 20:44
Permalink
SMART Recovery
SMART Recovery in my opinion does not tolerate much AA bashing for self serving reasons.
SMART Recovery was started after people left Rational Recovery. Anyone familiar with RR knows that the founder Jack Trimpey hates AA and he is very vocal about his distain for AA. I very much have great respect for his honest opinions on AA. I believe though that founders of SMART realized early on that AA was so integrated in society, that if they had any hope in getting recognized by the very pro-AA rehab industry, that they could not come out with guns blazing about AA. It just was not, and still is not politically correct to speak negatively about Alcoholics Anonymous. It is as if you were speaking poorly of the Pope himself.
Also I can imagine that meetings could become more of a anti-AA sessions versus using the tools that SMART Recovery has to help people fighting addictions. It takes away from what SMART is there for. I could see where entire meetings would be shares about horror stories of AA. There are so many valid complaints and unhappy campers in AA, that SMART I believe could not do it's job if meetings became consumed with AA bashing. Plus because courts mandate so many meetings, some people prefer SMART, but have go to AA to meet the silly amount of meetings the court requires. So SMART whether they like it or not, are having to deal with steppers left and right with the rehab industry , judicial system and steppers that do come to meetings as well.
I get the impression SMART is trying not to alienate steppers. I believe this is why SMART Recovery is growing by leaps and bounds. They are getting more recognition from the government, judicial systems and rehabs.
The demand for online meetings is exploding too. They have done this by being politically correct, because it was important to get their foot in the door to the many opportunities to help people.
Yes, I have heard of x-steppers running a SMART Meeting because they jumped ship. So many people come to them already doctrinated by 12 step dogma, they do the best they can in an overwelmingly AA biased world.
It is important to SMART to to win the battle and not just the war.
I personally wish they would be more open to let the poor AA souls that come unto their doorstep to vent some more about their negative experiences with AA/NA, and also to do more to correct 12 step dogma talk.
But to answer the question is Tom Horvath pro AA? NO! I think as president of SMART he feels he has to be held to a higher standard as far as not to bash AA. After attending last years annual SMART conference, SMART is not pro AA in my opinion at all. They are just overly politically correct. I do wish they would loosen up a bit, and I believe they are starting to an extent. There is still room for improvement!
Check them out at www.smartrecovery.org and the anti-AA site www.nadaytona.org
There were UK reps at the conference, and they were wonderful people and the UK is growing very rapidly . In part the UK is much more secular in general, and not as stuck on the religious AA as the US is.
Also face to face SMART meetings are growing as well. There is a growing interest nationally and more people are starting meetings. They also have online meetings that can be verified for the probation officers that allow it. There website also is filled with excellent data.
Articles of Criminals In Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous
www.nadaytona.org
Clara
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 18:48
Permalink
Tom believes that the SMART
Tom believes that the SMART program is great as a stand alone program or one to work alongside with another. If you think your program is good enough, bashing anything else is unnecessary. What people that support SMART and SOS or other alternatives to AA need to do is be willing to become facilitators thus making it available. It's all well and good to be on a board, commenting ad nauseum, but what difference does it make if there are no meetings to be had? SMART has fewer than 400 meetings, and SOS has less than that. These are not real contenders to the throne, if someone wants to phrase it that way, unless they amp up their availability.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 15:07
Permalink
"If you think your program is
"If you think your program is good enough, bashing anything else is unnecessary."
Thats a bit rich, coming from a stepper:-)
"What people that support SMART and SOS or other alternatives to AA need to do is be willing to become facilitators thus making it available"
Yes of course you are right, thats not the argument, what I am concerned about is steppers infiltrating and facilitating the alternatives for their own ulterior motives. Censorship of so called AA 'bashing' (telling the true) enables them do this
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 15:36
Permalink
Actually, it is just good
Actually, it is just good sportmanship in sales. I don't have to bash my competitors to make a sale if my product is as good or even better. Only if it isn't.
I am a believer that if someone wants help, there is something out there to help them do it. I wouldn't bash any other program just because I am in AA. After all, AA said 75 years ago that it wasn't the only way. Others programs might work just as well as AA worked for me.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 16:03
Permalink
No body is bashing products,
No body is bashing products, just to make a sale. Its theraputic deprogramming to remove the death, jails or institution indocrtination, so those who want to, can break from the cult and move on with their lives
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 16:20
Permalink
I think you know what I mean,
I think you know what I mean, and it was demonstrated when Massive was cut off of her rant.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
btnben
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 16:05
Permalink
Where?
Where did AA say it wasn't the only way 75 years ago?
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 16:43
Permalink
Ben, it is sprinkled
Ben, it is sprinkled throughout the literature. I am not going to point you to any one spot. After all, you know where it is. You made a point of telling me that you knew much more about AA than I ever would when I first got here. It's in the BB and in Daily Reflections, as well As Bill Sees It.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
btnben
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 16:53
Permalink
Not the truth, as usual, Clara
"After all, AA said 75 years ago that it wasn't the only way." Only the BB was there 75 years ago. Where does it say AA is not the only way?
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 17:28
Permalink
So? It says it is the BB.
So? It says it is the BB. The other works followed, of course.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
NoAAUK
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 17:27
Permalink
I don't recall it being
Clara, I don't recall it being sprinkled throughout the literature, In fact I don't recall it at all.
I used to do doorstep 12 stepping with the BB in the old days when I was seriously indoctrinated in the cult....I also used to pray to God to make me cease to exist, being Roman Catholic suicide wasn't a cult escape option, I would just go to Hell and that wouldn't have been much different
Anyway although Ive still got a BB somewhere, I'm not going to rummage through it to prove what everybody knows. I don't want to rummage through it again unless I need to prove a serious point
......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 17:32
Permalink
I know. Ben throws this out
I know. Ben throws this out once in a while for no real reason other than to keep something rolling. It doesn't matter. It got so silly that people were asking me where AA told others about SMART and RR and the like when it wouldn't be in their literature.
I was always told that AA wasn't the only way to get sober. I was never held hostage or "lied to..." That whine gets pretty old. I wasn't told that I had to leave my brain or my rights as a citizen at the door, yet some will argue that OF COURSE you have to... I DID some say that AA was all that had worked for them despite trying other methods. But I kept what their experiences were separate from mine and what I read about...
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
btnben
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 17:42
Permalink
Don't be so dismissive Clara
I think it is fairly important to point out the lengths steppers will go to to protect the cult. You said that AA has been saying it isn't the only way for 75 years, didn't you? You then went on to say it's in the BB, which it isn't. Can't you see the importance of showing that steppers, by their very nature, have to lie through their teeth. The "program" doesn't stand up to inspection.
Marietta lied about drink driving at 11. Danny won't even admit he's a man...lol. And now Clara is making up the contents of the big book. You three are doing a great job for the pro-AA credibility....lol
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
Clara
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 18:10
Permalink
I am not dismissive, Ben. I
I am not dismissive, Ben. I have pointed these things out before and am just choosing not to play.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
Trisha K.
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 18:43
Permalink
Ben, you were a stepper and a Pro-AA'er.....
...and not to long ago at that.
So please tell us, did you lie and cheat for AA, did you go to great lengths behaving immorally to protect AA? I bet you did!! So you now think every one else has behaved the same way.
Sort of reminds me of when you were on E-AA and conducted yourself like an arrogant pig, you were shown the door by the moderator and when you returned here to this site you instantly began attacking the members that advocated for AA. You attempted to point out how disruptive they were on this site (Orange Forums) and that the only reason you went over to e-AA was to show these members what it felt like to behave this way. This was a crock of bull because no one on e-AA or Orange Papers Forums acts as foolish as you.
I believe you were trying to impress your fellow members here, you were attempting to win over their trust, that you had become one of them.
“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine
massive
Sat, 05/19/2012 - 00:20
Permalink
trish tush- and conducted
trish tush- and conducted yourself like an arrogant pig,
there you go ...calling ben names like you are in a sandbox. Grow the #### up!
Massive
Pages