Troll Wars Part 500 (or so??)

It's my opinion at this point, yet again, that the trolling is getting out of hand. I'm not even talking about people who are expressing an opposing viewpoint, I'm talking about mainly the blatant harassment in posts such as these:

"Kate, do us a favor and get fucking lost then.

You don't have any superior influence here on this site. This site is for all. So deal with your emotions like any other grown adult, here.
I am sick and tired of listening to this whining when you anti-AA'ers can't get your way. Many of you revert back to this infantile ranting, it is an extreme dramatic episode."

(http://www.orange-papers.org/forum/comment/35674#comment-35674)

Anyone care to discuss?

Thanks;)

btnben's picture

Ban them again and the problem will go away. Simple solution.

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

becket's picture

Do you attempt to control all differing thoughts and opinions by ostracizing, exiling and dismissing? The single individual opposing voices may disappear, but the problem will not. As long as you hate, the problem will be in your midst, in your consciousness and in your bones. Why not try to work some of that hate out here on the forum, diffuse it so it does not make you an intolerable boor. The problem isn't out there, btnben. It's in you.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

btnben's picture

You haven't given us the full story about you drunk driving at age 11...lol. Come on now - I'm sure it's the truth...lol

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

BECKETT, HERE'S YOUR POST ABOUT 20 YRS.

She evidently did not,

She evidently did not, however. I should also have gone to jail - every day I was behind the wheel, for 20 years - because I did not draw a sober breath in all that time. But I never got busted. I was criminal, with arrogant intent, but never got arrested.

Kidding allowed (except for btnben)

patti

Jesus-is-Fraud's picture

What I don't like is the "discussions" where everyone just has to have an opinion, and they are opinions about others opinions, and the original opinions are opinions about the subject matter, and yet everyone chases that like dogs after a chicken, instead of sticking to the subject matter.

However, at the same time....

If it wasn't for the infighting and bullshit - you would not learn nearly as much and it would not be nearly as interesting.

But up to a point....

I think that is an individual thing.... As my proctologist loving sissy boy Billy W. said, "Instead of REACTING we recoil as if from a hot flame. We learn to step back and think."

Like fighting like cats and dogs on Youtube, someone shoots a comment at me, "You fucking cock sucking fag christian"... To which I might reply "Don't call me a christian!"

But beyond that... some people like to fight over relevant issues and some people just like to fight for the sake of something to do.

And I figure that just because someone throws a bone, does not mean I have to chase it.

That life is short and "Is this going to be a particularly meaningful and productive outcome in the long run?"

It's like some woman in the cue at the supermarket, I struck up a conversation with her and she asked "And do you cook for yourself?" I said "Yes I do." So she says, "Oh your carrying a bit of weight."

So I can take that one of several ways. The NORMAL victim reaction is to say, "Oh how fucking rude - blah, blah, blah."

The LOGICAL reasoning is to say, "Well what I think results in what I do, and what is do is how I keep myself, and how I keep myself is on display for all the world to see - so aside from saying what is self evident, how is what she is saying "rude" - it's not, she is just saying what she and everyone else see's, which is what I have put on display."

The POSITIVE take on it, is to say, "Aren't I fortunate, I have all these opportunities for improvement and plenty of my own business to mind - she has just helped me to improve myself."

I don't think there is much point in saying "You must or must not", it's really comes down to, "It's your life, and you only have so much time left, is this a productive way to be spending it?"

And - "Who's problem is it? If I don't take it on board, then who does it belong too?"

People are allowed to attack or provoke or serve up different opinions.

Some do it for real factual reasons, some do it just to provoke and some do it because they are under the delusion that others are not allowed to have differing opinions.

There are two parts to it, their part and my part. Some issues need to be debated, some people need to be told to fuck off and some people and their issues need to be left alone.

Sometimes the best course of action is simply knowing that you can, but you just don't have too - especially when it comes to dealing with idiotic fucks.

Sometimes it's just better to let them expose themselves for what they are and to move onto other more important things.

It's like small town life - so many people have minds like sponges - and instead of looking at all the great things in the world, they are compulsively masturbating over every bit of gossip, that they get by soaking up every piece of shit that comes floating down the sewer.

You have to be discriminating about what you focus on and who and what you let into your life and mind.

Persephone In Exile's picture

Well JIF, I think most of us are guilty of that...lol...I know I am. I'm talking about this line that keeps getting crossed where people are just essentially tagging posts with insults at people who are at least trying to discuss something. There's a difference between expressing an opposing view and just following people around a forum to insult and attack them. Not to mention how off track the discussions end up.

causeandeffect's picture

Oh for Pete's sake, this really has gotten out of control. For some odd reason they seem to truly believe that they own this forum even though its purpose is firmly against their belief systems. They feel they have more rights here than those for whom this site serves.

I've just grown tired of all the debating. I just don't really care anymore about having a dialogue with any of them. They are so clearly out of touch with reality, and AA has made them that way. Nobody will call someone on it when they lie during a share. In fact, in my experience, if someone is honest during a share, they will be called on it, because it doesn't conform to the dogmatic expectations of what one should say. They will then be coached on saying the right thing, per dogma, no matter how much it may vary from the person's actual truth. This is how liars are developed in AA. Don't let the rigorous honesty propaganda fool ya. That's why I've been finding it necessary to call them out.

No one will call anybody on it when they are hateful, either. They are too busy minding their own side of the street, and not pointing fingers for fear there will be fingers pointing back at them. And the examples of these problems go on and on and on. The end result is a group of very sick, neurotic people all lying to, and abusing each other, thinking it's the way thing should be, the way things have to be. Thinking it's best for their sobriety, as well as that of everybody else.

But it all just makes me so very tired sometimes. I just don't want to be around this toxicity anymore.

Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/

"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson

I completely agree. But if they are allowed to silence people and continuously derail threads, they would have achieved exactly what they are here to do. The only way to deal with these idiots is to not engage with them unless they make some genuine attempt to address the issue that we are here to talk about.

They are *only* here to cause trouble (God knows why) and one or two are obviously quite disturbed individuals. The best way of dealing with them is to ignore them unless they show some willingness to discuss things on the forum like adults. In which case, they are welcome, whatever their views are about AA, recovery, or whatever.

Basic psychology - don't reinforce bad behaviour by rewarding it with attention. It only encourages them.

Persephone In Exile's picture

humanspirit, I agree, I'm sorry I engaged the troll at all. It is best to ignore. There's no discussion of anything of value anyway, so it is pointless.

What bothers me almost the most is this attitude you see in the more deranged minds of steppism that people need to be taught lessons and face consequences, which might be fine and dandy when the people deciding these things need to happen aren't basing it on their own delusions. As it is, it's just disturbing. First Marietta with her wishing me a mentally challenged child as "punishment", now this person wants us to face our "denial" and our actions on the forum like he thinks he's some semi-divine web avenger? It's pretty sick, if you ask me.

That's all, but you're right. Ignoring is best. I do wish they could be banned, they periodically ruin the flow of this place. I guess if they're not it's best to decamp again until the problem is resolved....just like I did the last time this place was overrun with trolls.

NoAAUK's picture

It really is amazing how this stepper nonesense is still in existence this century. If aliens really do visit and study earth I wonder what they think about substance misuse treatment here. AA really should not still be going on in this day and age, what has happened? Its crazy. We shouldn't even be discussing these people, it should have been history long ago

......and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Matthew 24:11

becket's picture

"We shouldn't even be discussing these people, it should have been history long ago"

We all have dreams. We all must deal with what's in front of us. So deal.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

My theory is (and Martin Nicholaus confirmed this when he said in a survey of mental health professionals their least favorite client is an addict), why not just blow them off and send them to AA rather than focusing and working towards a real solution?

becket's picture

I don't think I own this forum. I would not want to own a forum. I don't think I have any more "rights" here than anyone else. Equality would do fine. You may suggest that equality characterizes this forum. I would disagree. I contribute. Take it or leave it.

In looking over the posts from the last year I cannot see where you have ever truly cared about having a dialogue with anyone who did not agree with you, causeandeffect. If I'm under a mistaken impression I would very much like to see evidence to the contrary.

Because some people are not in touch with your reality does not mean they are out of touch with all reality or their own reality. Reality is subjective. Give some room.

"Nobody will call someone on it when they lie during a share. In fact, in my experience, if someone is honest during a share, they will be called on it, because it doesn't conform to the dogmatic expectations of what one should say." Maybe you just believe someone is lying, or their experience is too fantastic to accept. That does not make it "lying". The bit about calling someone out on dogmatic expectations is so convoluted and inside-out that all I get from it is an extremely narrow and suspicious view of anyone else's interpretive powers.

"No one will call anybody on it when they are hateful, either. " O rly? I feel that your capacity for hateful posting is right up there with the best of them.

Take a nap.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Beckett,
FAKE IT UNTIL YOU MAKE IT.

patti

btnben's picture

That's why they chucked her out 22 years ago...lol - Probably because she started drink-driving at age 11 - just too far gone...lol

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Ben,
you are funny, lol!

patti

btnben's picture

The Philosopher's Stone? - Something that will make Marietta (becket) STFU?...lol

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Trisha K.'s picture

this will never end. There are many sites where opposing views are discussed in a adult fashion. Yes they can get a bit passionate at times but the rules are in place to keep everyone in check.
Cause, read your comments of late towards Clara, they are foul and rude. ben constantly fills this site with obscenities towards people. What does HS, PIE, NoAAUK, C&E, JIF and others do, NOTHING. You condone it and actually secretly encourage more of it. You are all dishonest.
You spout about peace, harmony, site running nicely, bla bla bla. Yeah, so long as every one locks step to your wisdom.
This is a site to openly discuss and debate AA, Pros and Cons our owner said as much. He did not hand over the chalice of superior persuasion to one side. If you want that go get on massives's blog or go start your own. I like reading Penny's opinions and many others, here.
What I don't like is when some of you get this sense of entitlement here. This site is for all.
No I am not right in my actions either but I purposely go "over the top" to wake everyone up to the harassment you are perpetrating on a few. I want to see how you like being talked to or about in a rude manner. There are many AA people here on this site (more then when I first became aware of it) some are active in AA and some are not but support it and some just let it be.
I am not trying to be the #1 enemy but I can not stand bullying, 15 vs 1.

This is an example of how Ben likes to relates to women on this site:

"btnben"

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 10:54 This may be of interest to people

So piss off with your derailing tactics Clara

Here is CauseandEffect:

causeandeffect
Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:48

clara, you are a bold faced liar

Nobody suggested that AA charges. Jeez, woman, you're both a liar and an idiot. I don't really believe in gawd, but I'll make an exception this time and pray for you.

“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine

Once you've taken a deep breath and calmed down a bit, could you perhaps tell us what your opinions are on AA and the 12 step program? That is what this forum is about, you know.

becket's picture

Brazen bear trap. This site is about the loathing of AA. It is not about AA and the 12-step program.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

What's wrong with the loathing of AA? Most of us have sat in those rooms for a very long time, so perhaps some of us do not want to discuss AA and the 12 steps. Maybe we'd rather discuss what BS it is.

becket's picture

"Cause, read your comments of late towards Clara, they are foul and rude. ben constantly fills this site with obscenities towards people. What does HS, PIE, NoAAUK, C&E, JIF and others do, NOTHING. You condone it and actually secretly encourage more of it."

This is correct. They are complicit. "The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men [and women] to do nothing." (Edmund Burke) Are they good men and women? Or are they men and women?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

btnben's picture

The end can't be far away now. Two birds, one stone, ban them both...lol.

That Burke quote is disputed by the way. And the funny thing is he was talking against rotten boroughs when he is supposed to have said it. In 18th century England you needed to be a landowner to have a vote. A rotten borough was a constituency where there was only one landowner so he elected the MP. The problem with Burke was that he was such a miserable, argumentative bastard (sound familiar?...lol) that the only way he could get re-elected was through a rotten borough...lol.

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

becket's picture

And he got re-elected.

I supported Danny's/Trisha's opinion. I did not rely on him/her for an opinion. But I am beyond certain that there is no way you can comprehend that.

I don't give a shit about Burke's alleged misadventures. The point is made. Collusion is the focus of the post, not Burke's disreputable politicking. You could have chosen to ignore it but you did not. There's nothing in any of my posts that would give cause to ban me. You are a hater, and ok, that's widely accepted. No one is here to change your mind about anything. You are like an insufferable in-law at a family gathering - you must be endured. I get it. I get it. I endure. But I don't think Orange's cutting me out of your consciousness would make YOU a better person.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

btnben's picture

"You are a hater, and ok, that's widely accepted. No one is here to change your mind about anything. You are like an insufferable in-law at a family gathering - you must be endured. "

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Jesus Christ, that is all I can write! You are so insignificant to Ben, this forum, me, I would guess others, whether you are on this forum or not, just doesn't not "honestly" have anything to do with Ben being a better person or anything else. Do you "honestly" think you have that kind of significance in Ben's life or persona? Jesus, lol.

patti

Just priceless. This is why you said, "Kate, getting fucking lost." My, how adult of you. Why don't you wake up to the harassment YOU perpetrate? Oh, and since this post did not show up up below the post I was referring to, the poster is Trisha K, lecturing us on how we should all behave like adults.

btnben's picture

"This is a site to openly discuss and debate AA, Pros and Cons are owner said as much."

It's "our owner" not "are owner" - How many times must you be told. When's lights out?

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

becket's picture

"It's 'our owner' not 'are owner' - How many times must you be told. "

Where's your question mark, btnben - "How many times . . . " begs a question mark. And that extra space between the period and the close-quote - typical.

You have absolutely no room! Bwahahahahaha! OK, get back in there and correct it like it never happened!!

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Actually, that's interesting. TraceLin, lately of this site (banned for rape threats) used to type 'are' instead of 'our' too. Do you think people are taught this spelling method in step school?

btnben's picture

The poor boy is so thick he still keeps making the same mistakes, even after we tell him time after time...lol.

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Persephone In Exile's picture

All of the grammatical errors are identical....and not shared by anyone else on this site.

Trisha K.'s picture

PIE, you are a fraud and one of the most insincere members here I have ever met. You totally disregard what your friends do to others.
Well bia..tch it is on...you will have no mercy from me. Good luck!! lMAO!!!
All you are concerned about is proving I am, Herman "Barking" Munster!!

“The more I traveled the more I realized that fear makes strangers of people who should be friends.”
Shirley MacLaine

Persephone In Exile's picture

...and there's the threat I've been waiting for.

JR Harris's picture

They usually release him for a few hours around 7:00 est............ unless they caught him coming to this site.

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

becket's picture

Where's the threat?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

Becket, seriously:
"Well bia..tch it is on...you will have no mercy from me. Good luck!! lMAO!!!"
Not that I'm too worried about anonymous lunatics, but still, that shit is just pathetic.

They are a sad example of what AA has become. They would rather quote the big book or other AA literature on here rather than go out and do any real helping to those in trouble. They probably people who are shunned by their own groups and consider coming on here some kind of warped service and like having some attention. They are only here to derail and are fanatical. This sort of thing went on over at ST with some of the same people and that site got bogged down with crap.
Because AA polarises people into those who believe in its methods as a spiritual cure and those who believe it is snake oil you are going to have controversy and the average stepper with blind faith has learnt not to think or question. The AA people that hang around here have no interest in anything constructive about helping people with addiction and have no real understanding of the problems that face people trying to recover from a serious problem. They feel justified in lying but are not even intelligent enough to make the rubbish they spout convincing and cannot see the contradictions. Nobody respects them due to the amount of time they waste with their childish little posts and pathetic little insights. I do find the image of all these losers praying away ( talking to themselves ) in the morning rather amusing, especially the moronic Clara would not be taken seriously by the majority in an AA meeting let alone anywhere else. I have had a Go at them in the past which they seem to think is a sign of anger which I find amusing as I simply regard them as childish and ignorent and I certainly don't surround myself with that type of person in life. They are unaware of their failings as a member of the human race but I'm sure the other members of their little groups spend plenty of time gossiping about them behind their backs in true AA fashion.
Although if they were banned some more idiots will come along it would give this forum a bit of breathing space so I think it is worth kicking them off. Otherwise just ignore them. They are attention seekers so don't give them what the want. Let them sit there writing their 50 posts a day but don't respond. If any hardcore steppers come here they will not really be swayed by any arguments here but those who doubt Bills faith healing program will see straight through any Billshit posted here by the made up personas that think they represent that stunning program. They represent the retarded old timers who Sit in meetings and drag everyone down by repeating those crappy phrases and suggesting prayer as an answer for anything. They represent those that abuse others or those that turn a blind eye when someone else is abusing. They represent the dogma of a wife cheater and a conman as if it was the world of God. If you want to listen to that that crap or argue then AA has meetings in every town with some idiots to talk to in person. Every meeting I ever went to had at least one resident nutter and there were often more!

Well, since I was told to getting fucking lost, I guess I have an opinion. That comment said more about the poster (Trisha K) than anything about me.