Uncomplicating things...step by step.

Over on Humanspirit\'s blog, Causeandeffect commented that every step and every aspect of the program should be scrutinized. I agree and thought the obvious place to start would be with the first step.

Step One: We admitted that we were powerless over alcohol and our lives had become unmanageable.

Powerlessness. That one word is what I find the most disturbing and detrimental about the whole program of AA. I have no power. I have no control. I have no say. I am at the mercy of everyone and everything. I am nothing. I must be taken care of. I must be told what to do. I am not capable. I am not smart. I am not worthy. I can\'t do it!!! I am powerless.
What does it mean to admit powerlessness? Is it really as soul crushing and self defeating as I see it? Or is it simply a way to open the door to a new way of thinking? And what does that new way of thinking entail?

Below is a list of questions pertaining to step one. I answered and asked these once a week, every week, for a year, in an AA group.
*Dear God, please set aside everything that I think I know, so that I may have an open mind.*

My way of living gets me scared, alone, drunk and suicidal.
Do I have the desperation of a drowning man tonight?
(Physical problem)
When I start drinking do I have little control over the amount I take? When drinking, do I crave another drink, then another...?
(mental problem)
Have I ever tried to quit entirely and found that I started again, no matter how many promises I made, willpower I tried to summon...DUI\'s, jails,rehabs, meetings, family conflict etc...
(unmanageability)
Am I having trouble with: family? friends? jobs? mood swings? depression? anger? loneliness? fear/anxiety? uselessness?
Based on everything I\'ve considered here, can I now say that I am powerless over alcohol and my life is unmanageable?
Am I an alcoholc?

So, there\'s the step one that I experienced. And boy oh boy did I feel powerless. Scrutinize away!

Comments

avogadno's picture

You gave a good example as to why step work is indoctrination. Step work is in a particular order and practiced one at a time for a specific reason. Powerlessness in step one is admitted under any qualifications, whether vulnerable to alcohol, powerless over the compulsion to drink, etc. Later, when surrendering to God control, you become powerless over everything.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

avogadno's picture

What do you need a HP (in AA context) for if you are only vulnerable to the effects of alcohol?

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

Ironic's picture

becket, how do you feel about e-AA? I bet we quote conferenced approved literature more often than they do.

Not to mention the fact that only one viewpoint is allowed on e-AA. How would you feel if we all went over there and told everyone we thought they were fucktarded. Would that be acceptable? Orange tolerates you, as you remind us regularly. Why do you feel you are entitled to more of a courtesy here than we are at e-AA? I've been wondering that.

Can you answer that for me?

becket's picture

Yes. The forum "rules" are different. It has nothing to do with what courtesies I feel I'm entitled to. They play softball over there and this is a little more hardball, that's all. This site has no regular moderator. If I were posting over there, which I am not, and you came on spewing a bunch of personal, below-the-belt, derogatory hate speech in my direction, the moderators would simply eliminate you. The rules here are different. There are several posters who are dedicated shit-stirrers, who spew said hate speech toward clara, toward billybudd, toward me, and toward anyone who does not toe the line and fall in with the AA-hating lockstep. I'm not talking about simple disagreement; I mean disallowing any contrary point of view to be entertained and blizzarding the effort with name-calling and minimizing and other childish behaviors.

I can tell you I'm not leaving this site unless Orange kicks me to the curb. So, other than my suddenly ending up dancing with Jimmy Hoffa, how would you envision my survival here? I have ideas and experiences to contribute to these discussions. I'm not all up in peoples' faces, pushing Bill W. idolatry or group prayer or the benefits of sponsorship. I haven't made a meeting in decades. I do have an interest in the way AA is portrayed on this forum by those who are capable of completing a sentence and withholding ugliness. I will also say that when somebody deliberately disses me I will not sit back and take it. There's no excuse for it, and I will raise hell over it in defense of myself. Anyone who is just perusing this forum will be able to see that we haven't strayed far from the barroom that still caters to the lowest common denominator. If that sends them packing, don't blame it on me. I try to remain civil and add ideas to the discussions. If I disagree with you I won't sit on those differences of opinion, but I will attempt to maintain some measure of courtesy. You call me a cunt and I'll come out swinging. Again.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

avogadno's picture

"There are several posters who are dedicated shit-stirrers, who spew said hate speech toward clara, toward billybudd, toward me, and toward anyone who does not toe the line and fall in with the AA-hating lockstep"

Notice that there are "several posters" in the OPF that are dedicating "shit-stirrers", according to Becket. And pick on people only because they don't "fall in line with the AA-hating lockstep". Becket lacked mentioning that those poor lil AA's that get nothing but abuse from this forum (boo-hoo) came here to play hardball and did some nasty things themselves: Such as wishing retarded babies, accusations of child abuse, lies and backtracking, de-railing, character assignation, assuming and projecting.

Shit gets out of hand, that’s for sure. But it happens on both sides. Feigning innocence and assuming it was just because you or they are AA’s is inaccurate as well. Other AA’s have popped in from time to time and although they didn’t get the red-carpet treatment they also all didn’t get their nose rubbed in dirt.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

becket's picture

I don't feign innocence. I don't want red carpet treatment and have never asked for or demanded it. All I'm telling you is if someone stirs the shit and I'm on the receiving end of it I'm gonna give as good as I get. I don't set out to slam anybody. I'd rather have a discussion. But I do not wear kid gloves, so consider this fair warning. I fight back, I'm not a zombie or a cadaver.

Now, where were we?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

avogadno's picture

We all know that becket.

You did say (paraphrase), "just cuz they/we are AA" and that may lead readers to beleive that anti AA plays dirty based only upon membership status.

You might be surprised at how many people feel the need to wean themselves off of the program.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

becket's picture

Does your post imply that many people are trying to wean themselves off of AA? Certainly you don't mean within this forum, as a true weaning means total disengagement from anything 12-step.

Or do you mean that I would be surprised to learn that very few people are, in fact, making an effort to divorce themselves from the 12 steps?

What do you think the anti-AA dirty play is actually based on, if not a vehement hatred for the 12-step modality and, by association, anyone who ever attended a meeting for any reason?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

Becket, that is 12 step thinking at its finest, right there. "....as a true weaning means total disengagement from anything 12-step."

No, you don't have to completely divorce yourself from anything, just like people shouldn't be "cold turkeyed" off of substances cruelly and then forced to admit to being not "clean" or "sober" if they ever use anything responsibly again. I'm completely divorced from the 12 steps, at least in my way of thinking. But that system left a legacy in my mind that I can't just "stuff" or wish away. It has to be processed, just like any emotional experience must be, this is what we do as humans. It's also what you learn when you work with someone with actual training in psychology and not just some guru status within "recovery".

becket's picture

Yes, I have been to many therapists in my many years. Some were good, very well trained in substance abuse, dependence, relationship abuse, sexual abuse - you name it. But the large majority of them were much like you say AA is: setting you up for your next appointment, in this case - tossing around the language of survivorship and healing. We are all survivors of something. It is not an exclusive distinction. Because you are in the middle of your process, seeing neither the shore of departure nor your destination, it must feel very immediate, this pulling away from the steps. I just never had that problem: I went to meetings for a few years and then I stopped. I retained those things that I found to be helpful and I ditched the rest. I did not have an AA hangover. My treatment was outpatient so I didn't have all the ridiculous dramas I read about on this forum. I've also been sober since 1980, so mine just doesn't feel like an anxiety-ridden, anger-drenched campaign. Never dealt with any "guru" in recovery. I learned early on to recognize misplaced praise, probably before I was ten.

My best thinking tells me that if something is truly, genuinely harmful to walk away. I am not required to be a whistle blower, a protester, an advocate for change, or a media whore who carries the message of hate. Note: I am not accusing anyone on this forum of these tactics. I'm merely pointing out that leaving AA did not make any demands on me, nor does my conscience tell me that I now have a duty make things right for everyone else. I'm not on any mission. I've experienced hellacious abuses in my lifetime, but since I'm closer to the end of life than I am to the beginning I am not compelled to co-opt any cause and run with it to the end of my days. I put thoughts out there to either be considered or dismissed, mostly dismissed. But I've become a more fluid writer since I arrived, and that will have to be my silver lining.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

Becket, I do completely respect the fact that your experience and mine were VERY different, I don't want that misunderstood. I've known many who had a much more benign experience with 12 step programs, some who went completely voluntarily and some less so. I don't know, I do take breaks from even thinking at all about it, it's no longer the immediate trauma that it was when I first started talking about it (actually, when I found the ST blog). I stay involved because it really bothers me what happened to so many people I saw destroyed, by what was done to me and what others here have shared with me of their experiences. It's simply not necessary to retraumatize people to the degree that is currently being done in so much of the recovery industry.

I don't consider myself a victim, I survived and am a stronger person for that. A lot of what I do is because of a few really horrible cases of people who didn't survive who I saw beaten down. I understand that that is not what you want to do with your life, as you say not feeling a duty to make things right for others. Right now I just don't feel that that's the right path for me.

But yes, I have also found over the years that forums are remarkable places to hone your writing skills, and silver linings are beautiful things indeed.

becket's picture

You write well. Why don't you write a book about your experiences? Even through a vanity press it would reach more than the 20 people on the forum. There is a huge, huge audience for this kind of thing because there are so many people who are damaged through mismanagement of addiction and alcoholism. It wouldn't have to be "Infinite Jest". But a volume of enlightenment as you see it would be welcome in many circles.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

Thank you, Becket. I am slowly writing things out. I'm also working on a masters degree, so I find it rather pleasant to be able to get out my points about this subject in fits and spurts here. I have little desire to become very well known, however.

I find it interesting that you said there that "there are so many who are damaged through the mismanagement of addiction and alcoholism". While you have expressed your desire to not be on a personal mission here, it would perhaps prove your point better to not antagonize those who were damaged by that process. Your point about it having been helpful to you personally, I mean. Help shine the light a bit on the flaws in the system instead of fighting with those who were hurt by those flaws. Does that make sense?

becket's picture

Beg pardon, but I have trouble believing btnben was damaged by AA. I think his damage occurred before he ever took a drink and it remains to this day. I have been the lucky recipient of his wrath since my first or second day on the forum, for some reason. He continues to misidentify me, ridicule me and virtually spit in my face. You don't honestly believe that I should walk away from that kind of abuse, do you? I can't fix him and he obviously can't fix himself. Option #3: fight the fuck back.

Other than that, not a bad day.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

I was speaking generally, not about Ben. And yes, if I were attacked on a forum I would fight back. I do so on political forums all the time, but I generally don't (as in only once) go to forums that advocate solely the side of the issues I disagree with just to be ornery.

As far as personal goals do go, however, and I apologize for dragging this off topic but this just cannot be said enough: PLEASE LEARN THE APPROPRIATE USE OF APOSTROPHES, PEOPLE!! ADDING AN " 'S" TO A WORD DOES NOT MAKE IT PLURAL. For examples of this almost comical misuse, please see these fine examples as documented on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/groups/apostrophes/

becket's picture

I passionately second that grammatical motion.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

Becket, THANK YOU!!! It drives me a little crazy, can you tell?

Conan's picture

..

Danny is currently "Rachel" - watch out folks, he's learned how to use a spell checker...lol

becket's picture

Say, you're that pal of btnben's, right? Why'd ya strip your post?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

btnben's picture

When I logged on it went into his account automatically. I didn't notice. It was just a post to PIE. Keep your hair on Marietta...lol

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

avogadno's picture

Why don't you tell me what you think it means, if you think I was trying to insinuate anything other than what I said. I think that even one person intentionally cutting back on meetings, instead of running away quickly, would be a surprise to you. I've gotten the impression that you think that everyone should have the courage to ward off anything that was emotionally demeaning (bad marriage, etc.). It goes along with the "why did you stay in AA for so long when you hated it so much?" bit.

Are you curious as to why some stay in AA, weaning themselves from it, rather than shoot out the door like a cannonball? Not talking about for years, perhaps months.

Side note: I don't use many innuendos, at least I try not to. I try to keep my comments clear, regardless to who I'm in discussion with or what my stance is. Maybe I'm bad at it, but I get the impression that you think I'm trying to be sly and take shots. Am I wrong or do you think I'm just bad at expressing myself?

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

becket's picture

I asked you what you meant because it was not clear to me. Your post could be interpreted several ways. If you choose to withhold clarity then you've just pissed on one more opportunity to make yourself heard. I don't care one way or the other.

"Why did you stay in AA for so long when you hated it so much?" is not a "bit": it's a legitimate question. Your sensitivity to it suggests that now you are quietly inclined to question your own actions at the behest of that bitch becket and it rubs you the wrong way. Bit? No. Question? Yes indeed.

Stay for 5 or 15 or 40 years against one's will vs. shoot out the door like a cannonball. There it is again: that pesky either/or shit.

I think that sometimes when you write you don't look ahead to how your post will be perceived or understood. I put no judgment on that; I was simply asking for clarification. Do what you will.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Clara's picture

That is a question I have asked. For example, Soberman certainly doesn't sound like someone that could be bullied, and he didn't like the AA bit. Didn't do the steps, didn't buy into it, yet he stayed for decades and helped others. I ask the question out of genuine confusion. And if I hated something, I can assure that once i made the break, horses couldn't drag me into a room. Look at Amasive. Everytime she goes, she comes back and vents on the board about how she hates AA. Fine, in a way... But she isn't going to wean herself from the program. It just seems so self defeating. If she could say that every listened, spellbound by her revelations, and they all clapped her on the back, took down the sign on the door, and left with her... that might be something. But it sounds more as if they use a hook to get her away from the podium. There is effective activism, but this doesn't sound like it. She never did elaborate how her protest went.

Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.

avogadno's picture

Clara, what is the point of consistently bring up your misunderstanding? Seriously. Do you really want to understand, or do you think that the reasoning is so illogical you are using it to make some other point?

I’ve said this before, early on. I can’t answer that question, I can only speculate. And I’m not going to repeat it now because I honestly don’t think it matters to you. In the past I’ve tried, with sincerity, to explain other things to you the best that I knew how without much luck.

I talked with a friend about this recently. There are deep aspects to some stories that are too personal to share in a public forum. I know that for the most part it probably wouldn’t make much difference to you, and that’s fine, but I think in some cases you might want to consider that this is the situation.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

Clara's picture

There might be personal reasons for it, but 40 years is a long time to be involved with something that you never bought into in the first place. Massive's story is a different. She seems to have enjoyed it until the last couple of years. I had an abusive relationship once, and I kept going back, going back, and going back, thinking that all these little changes I made along the way would make THE difference. But once I made the final break, I NEVER went back to him in any way, not even to have a soda with him. None of this "for old time's sake" to see how it was. To get a laugh, to see if it was really that bad, or whatever other reasons people give... It is the only personal example I can think of something even like this. Make a decision to leave but then LEAVE. I don't feel the need to blog about him, warn off other women, or anything else.

Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.

JR Harris's picture

Minimization tactic.

Exposing the tactics of rogue AA members that are protecting the hunting grounds of AA, one lie at a time.

"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.

btnben's picture

So.....you're right and everyone else is wrong?

And when will you understand - It's not all about you!!!!

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Clara's picture

No, I just don't get it. Sober sounds like a pretty together guy. I don't get the other's bit at all. "It hurts when I do this... So don't do that."

Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.

avogadno's picture

I appreciate the effort but you are comparing apples and oranges. If your ex was hurting thousands to such an extent he'd be pushing up daisys. Problem solved.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

Clara's picture

I don't think so. It is deciding what is good for you personally and then acting on it. What if my ex was helping thousands? There are thousands of people that believe AA helped them.

Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.

avogadno's picture

I'm not sensitive to the bits (lol) about "why xx spent so long in AA", because they weren't questions posed at me. It can be a fair question, as you pointed out, but becomes a "bit" when repeatedly thrown out into discussions that relate to people not even involved in the current discussion. I can't explain Soberman's reasoning, and another's lack of understanding it is not my fault.

"Choose to withhold clarity"? lmao, that really is funny! And it gets even better when you said that I "just pissed on one more opportunity to make yourself heard".

You don't fool me becket, your questions weren't about clarity. You don't care about the feelings of a former AA and don't want to understand why people don't leave [in a suitable] time frame. You wanted to derail the topic, make it about another persons lack of courage or wisdom or bullshit. As far as your concerned, if you don't understand another's feelings it's because they are lying. Even if you did understand, you wouldn't admit to it unless it was a neutral subject (not related to the program).

Furthermore, you can't stand to be called out for these tactics you use. I can tell your responses.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

becket's picture

"I can tell your responses."

You asked. I answered. You are unintelligible to me about 40% of the time. I am looking for intent, not just words, some of which have gone missing from your sentences on a fairly regular basis. I'm trying to communicate with you. You just drag out the bitch slap. OK. Ignore what I write from here on out and we'll be fine.

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

avogadno's picture

Perhaps you need a former anti AA that got sucked back in to translate for you.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

becket's picture

Is there such a thing?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

causeandeffect's picture

Avo, I understand what you say 100% of the time.

Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/

"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson

causeandeffect's picture

Weaning is a gradual process, and one I went through. Once I had found the Orange Papers I had a mixture of emotions, but mostly relief. Still, I had a great deal of anxiety about leaving due to the threats of jails, institutions or death that had been continuously hammered into my mind. I started going to less and less meetings, and having found a group of people on ST that were staying sober without AA, I started to gain confidence in myself and in my ability to stay sober that I had lacked in AA. But the process was very valuable for me because the craziness became more and more apparent, as I had quit trying to pretend that what I was hearing and seeing was somehow beneficial for me. But my last meeting was well over a year ago. When that meeting was over, I knew it was going to be my last. And it was. I have never gone back since then. I suppose I could just walk away, but I'm just not that kind of person. I had found AA to be very toxic indeed, and refuse to not be on the outside, speaking my mind for the benefit of others who need to leave that toxic environment.

But I do know people who find the environment toxic, but have the courage to return that I lack. They remain and speak their minds from the inside, as they refuse to allow things they find unacceptable to happen to newcomers. These people are called the "Newcomers Rescue League" and I believe Soberman is one of them. One guy I know of from another forum has well over 20 years. His only reason to "keep coming back" is to tell newcomers that they don't need a higher power to get sober (because they don't) and to be an example of proof of that. Even though he's respectful in his presentation of this simple fact, through the years he's faced all kinds of derision, and even physical threats. People need to know their are other ways, and no brainwashed stepper will ever tell them this. Better they should die of their addictions, than to allow them to find another way. AA's don't take kindly to the truth.

Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/

"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson

avogadno's picture

c&e, I've heard of others doing the same as Soberman. There is nothing wrong with it in my opinion. A different pov given respectfully will only appeal to those that are interested. It's not like your telling the rest they would die if they don't try it your way. By there own advice, take what you want and leave the rest. I remember waiting for the day I'd start learning something, like finding that good meeting. That never happened, all I found were meetings that weren't as bad as some of the others. Hearing someone from the "Newcomers Rescue League" might have changed my the last few years of my life for the better. I could have stopped looking for something that wasn’t out there and trying to change myself in order to fit in. It’s no fun pretending or trying to be someone your not. I’m not big on makeup, as you can tell by my picture ;) having someone tell me to put some one would have been upsetting. lol. jk

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

causeandeffect's picture

Avo, because there IS nothing wrong with it. We all know people who have continually relapsed until they were finally out of AA, until they finally tried something else. There are many more that we don't know about. One thing we will never, ever know is how many people have died from their addictions that could have been helped by a different approach. AA claims their primary purpose is to stay sober and help other alcoholics achieve sobriety. That's not true. If it were, they'd have absolutely no problem with telling people that there are alternatives. Yet as we have discovered, they tear down notices of SMART meetings when they happen across them. Their primary purpose is to keep people in AA at all costs--even death. There's only one reason for that. It's a cult.

Troll free AA critical forum
http://www.expaa.org/

"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." ~ Neil deGrasse Tyson

Persephone In Exile's picture

I've only done this once, and I don't know if it was worthwhile or not, but it was an attempt of sorts. I wish I could talk to people who were in the treatment process as well, though. Just to give people a little hope. I think it's worthwhile. Some people feel absolutely hopeless in treatment/early recovery. I couldn't obviously advise any of these people (but then again, they're getting advice from people whose only "expertise" is working "the program"), but the message is just SO strong that it's going to be THIS life, a life of meetings and 12 steps or else you'll die or end up in the jails or the mental hospital. I know the idea is to do a "scared straight" sort of number on some people, but much of the time it just scares people half to death.

btnben's picture

I've been looking at collecting info for the UK but it's a shitload of work. I'm also writing something to categorise and store all the AA horror stories with the newspaper links. It wouldn't be much of a change to set it up to hold stories and reports about treatment centres. It would be nothing immediate but would grow into a transportable (by e-mail) database of reports from TCs. I don't know if such a thing would work but I do know that I want to do something.

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

becket's picture

*he's a saint*

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

Persephone In Exile's picture

Yeah, I abandoned that project a while back when I took a huge break from all of this, but now talking to others here I think it would be a good idea to do. It seems like Orange said we could compile some of it here, I don't remember....I'm way too web inept to ever set anything up myself.

I think almost more than reviews, which I had originally wanted to do, a compilation of horror stories from these places just available for more people to see would be at least a start. I know there is already a lot out there, like the Surviving Straight Inc. and the Truth about Pathway Family etc., but if people see it they assume it's isolated, not an industry-wide problem. I'm up for doing it, Ben.

btnben's picture

I've been sort of playing at it but I'm writing it in Visual Basic - haven't done any for about 10 years so 90% of the time is learning. When you've got no deadline "learning" often means "seeing something shiny" and being diverted for hours and not getting anything done.

The idea I had was to create a DB in Excel with a VB interface that can be sent as an attachment to an e-mail. As many as you want instantly. Sorry if it's a bit techie - I'll get something sorted soon and send it to you - easier to understand if you see it.

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Persephone In Exile's picture

In the immortal words of Garrett Morris, "Say what?"

btnben's picture

Just trying to make people think I know what I'm talking about. Completely clueless really...lol

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

avogadno's picture

Kathleen Turner just did a promotion for a new play or film. She's a stepper and said that the only way is to do this for life. I deleted it without the link I was just too disgusted to wonder why in the world she thinks she's at liberty to make a claim like that about everyone.

Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/

becket's picture

"She's a stepper and said that the only way is to do this for life."

I have read this a few times and I don't see anywhere within that statement a declaration that the only way for all people is to do this for life. Where did you get that?

“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian

btnben's picture

is implied by using the word "only" as in "no other". If there were exceptions they would have been stated. Their absence means there aren't any exceptions.

God damn it, get me a whiskey

Bill W, Deathbed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc

Persephone In Exile's picture

Because it's what people say once they lose their careers?

Clara's picture

So much for "radio, press or films..."

Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.

Pages