Those posters who are familiar with the OP will know the concept dreamt up by Orange. It is an imaginary (as yet) organisation whose aim is to save the newcomer from the grasps of the cult (sounds so ominous...lol). In reality, I'm sure that most of the anti folk on here went to AA because they were misinformed . The problem then was that, after entering through those doors, the REAL job of misinformation began.
I've noticed, over the last few days, new names logging in. Several haven't posted yet, and I thought it could be a good idea to have a thread every few weeks/months about what is happening here as a forum, what plans do people have to get the truth out there, and even how they feel about not going to meetings etc. Just an idea.
Pennywise
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 11:10
Permalink
PennyW said “Beliefs might
PennyW said “Beliefs might appear real, but they are not "really real" in the sense that they exits floating in air or in the mind waiting to strike out and kill.” I guess my wireless internet connection isn’t real.
That's sort of my point. Your wireless internet connection DOES EXIST, floating in the air (so to speak), waiting to connect to your computer. Science can prove this. My theory is that, unlike your internet connection, beliefs DON'T exist in that way. I never said that you have to be able to visually see something for it to be real.
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
gigi
Fri, 04/13/2012 - 20:01
Permalink
Becket
If the human being ( whose ego is in overdrive and who misrepresents the program to suit his or her own agenda has the power to personally, one-on-one, in your face make demands of another human being), contributes to the death of another human being, and he is acting as an agent of AA, does AA have any culpability? If AA knows that the program is being misrepresented and its members are abusing other members yet does nothing to stop it; wouldn't AA be somewhat to blame?
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
alkieanon
Fri, 04/13/2012 - 21:49
Permalink
Blame Game
Blame game. Gotta blame something else so the human being can claim powerlessness (AA directs and controls the human being's every action) and thereby avoid personal responsibility. Sweet! :P
JR Harris
Fri, 04/13/2012 - 23:55
Permalink
28.5 million people leave AA only 1.5 million stay a year
1.5 million (5% retention rate) is the number of people who stay and worship Bill Wilson chanting a year. 28.5 million people are the 95% that leave and don't die. Who do they blame?
"Tradition 10 - Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy." Please follow orders from the Interchurch Center if you are an AA member and don't comment.
alkieanon
Fri, 05/04/2012 - 06:28
Permalink
Who Do They Blame?
JR Harris says: "Who do they blame?"
No one. The 94.99% of people who leave merely congratulate themselves for graduating, move on with life, and harbor no ill will. The remaining 0.01%, well ....
gigi
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 07:06
Permalink
Blame is the wrong word. I
Blame is the wrong word. I should have been more careful with what I was trying to say. If the program of AA is being twisted and manipulated by individuals, and those individuals are doing harm in the name of AA-is AAWS in any way responsible to take some sort of action to address such manipulation of the program?
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
alkieanon
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 07:32
Permalink
Eliminate the Concept of Sponsorship
Eliminate the concept of sponsorship. Never was/is in the first 164.
gigi
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 14:36
Permalink
Great idea. Not too likely
Great idea. Not too likely though. A lot of people seem to get off on the power of being a sponsor and trying to run someone's life.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
alkieanon
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 20:16
Permalink
Discussion of the Pros and Cons of Sponsorship
Honest and open discussion of the pros and cons of sponsorship.
becket
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 11:20
Permalink
Contributes to the death of
Contributes to the death of another human being in what way? Are you suggesting death by literature?
How would "AA [know] that the program is being misrepresented"? Who should know? The GSO? The police? JR Harris?
They don't lock the doors behind anyone who attends a meeting. One is free to leave at any time. If a murder takes place and the perpetrator is a member of AA, s/he is a murderer. There is no offense identified within the law as an AAMurder. If a suicide takes and the victim is or was in AA, s/he has committed suicide. There is no cause of death listed in any coroner's handbook as AASuicide.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
gigi
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 14:32
Permalink
Death by literature? God no!
I'm not waving an AA kills flag. I have an AA sucks banner; but that's as far as I go. I don't have the answers but I do have a lot of questions.
"If I forget who I am, I am myself. If I remember who I am, I am you."
jonnijoy
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 13:14
Permalink
Wow! have not been here for a while.
The only thing that i see that has changed is that IFOD is now the forum tuff-guy lol at you ifod ie; neeedledick;)
btnben
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 19:08
Permalink
Marietta Meltdown strikes again...lol
I just asked one simple question and I get yet another major meltdown...lol. Does the fun never end. Everyone knows that becket is Marietta but she keeps giving out little bits of information that just don't add up. The latest bit of hilarity is that she hasn't been to a meeting in 22 years...lol
Just reading through the posts on this thread, is it possible that the certainty of how things are run and should be run in meetings come from someone who hasn't attended in 22 years? She complained about meth users ruining her meetings. Pre 1990? I'm pretty sure meth wasn't a problem then, but will gladly bow down to experience greater than mine. I think Marietta screwed up because it's only been a couple of years since she stopped going to meetings.
I did find it strange that the view today (Clara) of not accepting addicts is less tolerant than the alleged view (Marietta Meltdown) in 1990....lol Just too many inconsistencies MM
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
becket
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 20:48
Permalink
I have commented many, many
I have commented many, many times about the dismay I feel when I hear about the way meetings are conducted these days. No, I have not been to a meeting in 22 years, which I fully admit. What is your problem?
"I'm pretty sure meth wasn't a problem then, but will gladly bow down to experience greater than mine." Bend over, ben.
The reason this doesn't add up for you is that your numbers are wrong. Try again.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
btnben
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 04:19
Permalink
You just don't appreciate how fortunate you are people.
Be more grateful...lol. Marietta Meltdown deigned to converse with you yesterday...lol
"I've rather enjoyed my day here discussing relevant and important subjects with people who can read and comprehend."
For once the conversation was "relevant and important" - not like the times that members talk without the divine guiding presence of MM. The arrogance of this woman knows no bounds...lol
God damn it, get me a whiskey
Bill W, Deathbed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?source=patrick.net&v=Sdn3O6aaMNc
Clara
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 07:17
Permalink
Yet you miss her when she is
Yet you miss her when she is gone, and the forum makes jokes about her. Go figure.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
avogadno
Sat, 04/14/2012 - 22:33
Permalink
Perse, everyone. Thought I'd continue the coverse..
Perse, everyone. Thought I'd continue the conversation from page 2 here. It was getting goofy, and couldn't read w/out a magnifying glass, lol. In response to what Persephone wrote (quoted below):
The same at my NA meetings. We didn't discuss the particulars about using. Actually, in fellowshipping we didn't either unless it was one on one or maybe three of us. One thing is for sure, I felt like it. I wanted to talk about using and felt like I needed to get a lot of that out of my system. I understand it's a prime topic for relapse concerning others hearing it. Considering that then, maybe it isn't best to have the support of another addict. Talk therapy can be very helpful.
Oh, this has been brought up before but I don't think it's discussed enough.
I am opposed of the idea that we should be thinking of only the awful, sick times. Partying was a big part of my life. And regardless of what they say or how I was convinced I was a serious addict all those years, I don't think that was true. Before I got into the opiates after my 2nd son was born I was a drinker, pot smoker, occasional coke, basically everything. I also managed to finish HS and college, had a little career for 15 years, met and dated, married my husband. There were a lot of fun times and I kept up with life just fine. Those memories are important to me. I was losing a lot when, especially rehab, I was told that I shouldn’t discuss past using in a positive or fun way. The truth is that I often had a great time before I got hard core.
Perse said:
“Avo, actually, at every NA meeting I've ever been to there has been a general ban on sharing specifics of your using, so as to not trigger cravings in others. Some slight mentions slip through, usually if someone was discussing having relapsed on something that *wasn't* their DOC, but the terms were kept very, very general. "Using". Or "drinking". Now, once the meeting ended that all flew out the window, so you knew exactly what everyone was on, but for the purpose of meetings, absolutely not. Was that how it was at your NA?”
Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/
Clara
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 07:22
Permalink
I had a great time drinking,
I had a great time drinking, too, until it was no longer that way. It took a darker spin, though, and I started having problems with it. That is the thing for me to remember that and to not romanticize the "good times." Even if I took a drink tomorrow, it might be fine for a while, but I don't have a reason to think it would stay that way. This has often been stated in meetings. That is one reason people say they say to remember their last drunk verses their first.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
Persephone In Exile
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 08:34
Permalink
Thanks, Avo. Clara, it's a
Thanks, Avo. Clara, it's a bit easier to respond here to what you said as well, as if I had over on that other thread my comment would be 2 words per line.
I agree, people have a great many varied interests here, and I don't think this was meant to be a cohesive movement type of board in that respect. Well, when I first discovered the ST site, and then this forum, I was much more interested in deprogramming from the insanity and BS I'd been fed. I'm moving beyond that on a personal level though, and it probably wouldn't be a healthy thing to be holding onto for a long period of time, either. That said, my interest is moving into there being help for people who are in the situation I was in, no matter what the substance, that situation of having one's fate decided for them and shoved into this system, as well as helping those who are miserably depressed from the sense these programs can give that no matter what you do, it's never quite enough or even never the right thing. That will likely change and grow as well, as I learn more and more from the experiences I've had.
I think that we all have different aims and interests in the topic of 12 step groups shows even more how absurd the one-size-fits-all nature of the "treatment" really is, also. We didn't go into this with the same story, much as our "mentors" in 12 step tried to get us to admit to that idea of a unified story, and we didn't come out with the same story, either.
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
Clara
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 09:18
Permalink
Yes, the format is rather
Yes, the format is rather hard to keep up with...
PIE, how is it that you came "to be shoved" into this system? I believe AA to be a voluntary program (unless, of course, people are mandated it to it, and you can tell who they are because they couldn't be less interested for the most part.) I agree that AA isn't for everyone, just as any other program makes a similar claim. I just think it is wrong for people to go in anyplace and tell others that it won't work for you because this is what my experience was... My feeling from this board is that AA was somehow remiss in that they don't have a little pamphlet to give someone or the willingness on the part of the member to drive someone around until they find their program of choice, if they find one at all, or spend time in their meetings discussing those options. Many have tried those options and came back because AA was what worked for them. People that are in AA want to be there, for the most part, certainly oldtimers. I read these things when I first got to OPF.
I know people in AA that have stories that in no way sound like mine. The only common ground was the alcohol. I know women that might not find too much in common with a sponsor that sold herself for meth and presents herself so crudely. Iknow that I personally wouldn't want to be around someone that speaks like that and I wouldn't be. There is alot about these experiences that I know I couldn't endure listening to for long. I've just personally derived much good from AA. I wish it had been this way for all.
I wish you well in moving forward.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
avogadno
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 09:46
Permalink
Perse's story and mine are
Perse's story and mine are very similar. Almost scary. Pressure (pushing) comes it different forms and from diff sides. Get pushed into treatment (AA) by Doc's, counselors, family or friends. When you get to those places you are pulled in by the members and the literature.
Many people aren't aware of the paradoxical features of AA and since the org has lied since it's inception, we now know why. The org tells the family and friends that the addict is unwilling and in denial if they don't want to participate and they members of AA say the same thing. Oh yes, you don't believe that AA lies or is any different, and you didn't see this in your group. Well, nevertheless it happens. And unless you can conceive of it happening, Clara, you won't understand the pressures.
Pro Empowerment!
Truth about AA: http://orange-papers.org/menu1.html
Expose AA: http://www.expaa.org/
becket
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 10:20
Permalink
First, you get "pushed in".
First, you get "pushed in". After that you're told you're in denial. Is this the true order of coercion? Because there is a huge window between the two through which anyone can flee, and that is the "just say no" window. How is it that two strong, intelligent women allowed others to make this choice for them? How does anyone allow others to call the shots here? This is the first instance of turning one's will and life over to a "higher power". How can anyone criticize AA for making such a demand of them when they have already succumbed to this suggestion before they stepped through the doors of a meeting or a treatment center?
I acknowledge the presence of mental and emotional vulnerability here. I'm just curious about the surrender aspect of trying AA. I went to AA on my own after a bludgeoning with alcohol; maybe those of us who choose AA rather than having been funneled into it have less resistance to the program and so we benefit from it more. Just a theory.
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Persephone In Exile
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 14:56
Permalink
Well, all I can say is that I
Well, all I can say is that I no longer let anyone else call the shots for me as well as I can. Nor can I even believe I was ever the sickly, weak person I was back then, Becket.
How is this hard to believe? That one just baffles me. I had already turned much of my will over to medical professionals due to a then-chronic medical condition compounded by an injury. I made a huge mistake in letting others call the shots, and will never, ever do so again in almost any facet of my life. Ever. But this does happen, and in a variety of social situations. We've all heard about abused spouses/abusive relationships, and it's hard to understand that measure of control either when you haven't been in it, I know it is for me, but it's not so hard to understand a beaten wife not leaving when I look at what I myself put up with for almost an entire life.
I was from a freakishly controlling family. Probably too close to more than one of the "old countries". It's not terribly uncommon.
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
Persephone In Exile
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 10:27
Permalink
Clara, Avo said it (either
Clara, Avo said it (either above or below this, don't know where my comment will end up posting), and I've said it so many times on this board already. I will say it again. I was prescribed massive amounts of opiates. I got addicted. There's little help in getting you off of them medically, sometimes, sometimes not, it depends on the doctor, honestly. Family, doctors, everyone pressures you into getting "help" through official channels, and that help was (in my case) ONLY of the 12 step variety. Families (it was NOT just mine) are told that their loved ones must submit to the program or they're "in denial", which is used as a double bind against the patient. If you don't go along, even if you want off the drugs, it is used as proof positive that you really are an addict. The family members I still even talk to, after this fiasco, now tell me they were just really frightened into this, they didn't really buy everything they were told, but thought these people to be experts, etc. Were afraid of the constant refrain that I must become an ardent 12 stepper or die in the process.
It was demoralizing, it was horrible. 30 day rehab was insisted on in the end. And it was AA. Not even AA + NA. It was strictly AA, with loads of other confrontational tactics used on patients to illustrate our "character defects" (the wearing of silly signs, clocks around our necks to illustrate that we needed to learn the value of being "on time", hot seat sessions in which we were excoriated by other patients, etc.). This was, admittedly, 12 step on steroids, but I've never maintained that I ever walked into AA of my own accord and tried to be an obedient member.
Yes, you can say that that was "not AA". Well, what was it, then? An "outside issue"? Should AA really be pulling that constantly (or random members of AA) when its name and materials are being used, for profit, in ways that are emotionally damaging to patients? Or even in ways that are considered "not AA"?
OK, that was more info than I usually prefer to share, but the point seemed to be not getting across otherwise.
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
becket
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 10:49
Permalink
Sorry, Persephone, but was
Sorry, Persephone, but was this in response to Clara or to me? It's hard to follow, as you know!
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Clara
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 11:22
Permalink
PIE, it sounds awful. One
PIE, it sounds awful. One thing that I have gathered from people that go to rehab is that there are some people that need that kind of regimentation. Others don't. I know very high functioning alcoholics and drug addicts that didn't need to be told when to brush their teeth, although Dena was just a wreck that she describes as needing someone to tell her to get out of bed, brush her teeth, put on makeup, the BLUE top, not the red because she wore it yesterday, and come to the meeting. Don't forget to block out some time for lunch afterward. I don't think that everyone needs that, and I feel that most programs seem to be geared for worst case scenarios. I feel that way, too, about the "drink and die" stuff. I never felt that way about myself but I can see how others can and did. If you have your BB and can read the last story, that is how I viewed AA. How to live sober. I didn't know people that didn't drink and I knew if I wanted to not drink, I had to make dramatic changes. AA helped me to create another life.
I don't have an answer for you other than the AA information is out there for sale, and there isn't a limit on who buys it. At one time in AA's history, the only way to do the program was to buy a book through mail order and do it yourself. The meeting concept developed from people in Bill's house that congregated and that people started knocking on the door to participate. I never did understand how someone could take the material and tinker with it to make it something different (a la SOS), although there only has to be a 10% difference in many things for it to slide... I don't know how so many things were able to be copied from AA, even when the copyrights were in effect, other than perhaps it was felt that it was better to help others than to claim intellectual property rights. And that was true until the German case where someone was changing the works.
I know many people that come to AA via family pressure. I don't doubt that some of these people genuinely want to get well while others still consider themselves to be just having fun without realizing that it is to try recovery or they will leave. There is a problem somewhere in that mix or the family wouldn't be doing what they are doing when they do those interventions. I know others that think the family won't leave while it is halfway out the door and it is apparent to everyone. They might not consider themselves to be an alcoholic or an addict, but SOMETHING brought this family to where it was...
Do you mind me asking why there are members of the family that you don't talk to? I had an uncle that was angry for a long time when his family put him in the "haushka" even though he knew he was jeapordizing everything around him. He didn't see that while the choice may have been faulty, there weren't many other options to removing him from where he was, taking over the control of the business and running things until he could make rational decisions. To this day, though, Carl cannot understand that his alcoholism created brain damage and that he will never be who he was at one time. That's hard.
Remember Christopher Stevens when you vote.
Persephone In Exile
Sun, 04/15/2012 - 16:41
Permalink
Clara, if you don't mind, I
Clara, if you don't mind, I'll limit my comments to that to what I just posted above. My family was just very controlling, and would be still if I allowed them to be.
Edit: sorry, I get nervous when I post that much sometimes.
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
becket
Mon, 04/16/2012 - 10:50
Permalink
Persephone, I'm curious about
Persephone, I'm curious about one aspect of this so-called "treatment". I don't ask this to be confrontational, I just feel like, for me, this piece is missing from your story: was there a way to leave the facility or were you in lockdown?
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.”
― Christopher Hitchens, Letters to a Young Contrarian
Persephone In Exile
Mon, 04/16/2012 - 12:24
Permalink
Well, it was in a very small
Well, it was in a very small town about an hour from the city. I had no car there. There were also ramifications if I left.
Honestly, it was a just stand the storm sort of situation for me. To be clear, what was the most scarring aspect of it wasn't what was done and said to me, it was watching it done to others. And being asked to join in and heap it myself on others, which I adamantly refused to do. I also refused to share in group. For that I was given a "feelings cube" I was supposed to roll (it was a big wooden die with emotions etched on each side) and discuss in group, but I just made up nonsense and diverted that.
Seriously, the worst was watching it done to others. They would break down and cry, and it was horrible to see. The one who was abused the most killed himself right after treatment. It was really, really awful.
http://badrecovery.blogspot.com/
GTFO
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 00:38
Permalink
Trolls gone, restart this discussion
Reading this thread pissed me off because of the maniacal trolls who disrupted it. But, I think they are banned now.
Now, allow me to be a complete noob here by asking: what can we do in an organized way to counter the influence of 12-step cults? Has anyone organized anything?
Someone tried to gauge interest in protesting wrong assumptions about addiction to alcohol projected in the recent film "Flight" starring Denzel Washington. While I am not sure that would have been the very best activity (I haven't even seen the movie) I did like the spirit of the effort.
Anything new afoot? Let's get cracking! :)
Exposing the truth about AA http://www.expaa.org/
FrybreadSam (not verified)
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 06:25
Permalink
What was wrong with how it
What was wrong with how it was projected in the movie? All I have heard us how well it was projected. It was about one man's ability to use drugs and alcohol yet still function to a high degree. Until the guy was in jail, he apparently never sought treatment or was professionally censured.
I think the best counter is go find something else that works for you that you can recommend because you have done it.
GTFO
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 08:05
Permalink
Maybe nothing is wrong with
Maybe nothing is wrong with the film. My point was, however, to inquire about action re: Newcomers Rescue League. :)
Exposing the truth about AA http://www.expaa.org/
Gunthar2000
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 08:28
Permalink
I used to go to meetings...
I used to go to meetings just to raise awareness that AA was a religious cult.
After one meeting I was surrounded by an angry mob of men.
It's a dangerous thing to do.
AA is a religious cult dressed up to look like a treatment for alcoholism.
Gunthar2000
http://www.expaa.org/
GTFO
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 12:21
Permalink
violence should be avoided
Well, it takes a lot of guts to do what you did, Gunthar. Proud of ya. I'm not an advocate of such direct confrontation, though.
I've been in a scuffle or two before in AA meetings, and know there is too much impotent rage just below the surface to risk giving the hardcore cultists an opportunity to use physical violence as a response. It's too easy for them and must be avoided, especially on private property such as a church basement where we'd risk arrest as well as a beating.
What else might many of us organize to do to expose AA for the cult it is?
Exposing the truth about AA http://www.expaa.org/
Gunthar2000
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 12:35
Permalink
I think you're doing it right now.
Blogging is a great way to get the word out there.
If you have something that you've written and you'd like us to post it as a page on the Expose AA website, we can do that also. Of course we'll have to look at it first... Judging from what I've seen from you so far, I'm pretty sure that the team will welcome your contribution.
Every little bit helps.
AA is a religious cult dressed up to look like a treatment for alcoholism.
Gunthar2000
http://www.expaa.org/
Pages